Longitudinal Analysis of Fluoride Levels in Irish Water Supplies: A 52-Year Review

IF 2.9 3区 医学 Q2 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Community dentistry and oral epidemiology Pub Date : 2026-07-31 Epub Date: 2026-01-28 DOI:10.1111/cdoe.70055
Vinay Sharma, Brian O'Connell, Eithne O'Flaherty, Jan Rigby, Jacinta McLoughlin, Michael Cronin, Michael O'Sullivan, Lewis Winning, Oscar Cassetti, Michael Crowe
{"title":"Longitudinal Analysis of Fluoride Levels in Irish Water Supplies: A 52-Year Review","authors":"Vinay Sharma,&nbsp;Brian O'Connell,&nbsp;Eithne O'Flaherty,&nbsp;Jan Rigby,&nbsp;Jacinta McLoughlin,&nbsp;Michael Cronin,&nbsp;Michael O'Sullivan,&nbsp;Lewis Winning,&nbsp;Oscar Cassetti,&nbsp;Michael Crowe","doi":"10.1111/cdoe.70055","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background/Aim</h3>\n \n <p>The Health (Fluoridation of Water Supplies) Act of 1960 in Ireland mandates monthly fluoride sampling in Public Water Supplies (PWS). In 2007, authorities adjusted the mandated fluoride concentration from 0.8–1.0 to 0.6–0.8 mg/L. Approximately 71% of the Irish population has access to fluoridated drinking water. This study aimed to analyse fluoride measurements in Irish water supplies for five decades (1964–2016) to assess compliance and effectiveness of the fluoridation programme.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Data were sourced from government records and Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) reports. Analysis focused on fluoride concentration measurements, compliance rates, and data completeness across public, private, and group water supplies. Descriptive statistics were used to evaluate trends and patterns in fluoride levels over time.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>By 2000, over 90% (<i>n</i> = 307) of PWS, each serving more than 1000 persons, were fluoridated. In the early monitoring period (1964–69), missing data were substantial at 66%, with <i>satisfactory</i> fluoride results (0.8–1.00 mg/L) at only 17% and <i>marginal</i> results (0.70–0.80 and &gt; 1.00–1.10 mg/L) at 15%. Compliance improved steadily, reaching peak performance in 1994–99 with 57% <i>satisfactory</i> results. Following the 2007 adjustment in target concentrations, missing data decreased significantly to 18%, with <i>satisfactory</i> results (0.60–0.80 mg/L) increasing from 40% to 49% and <i>marginal</i> results (0.50–0.60 mg/L and &gt; 0.80–0.90 mg/L) stabilising at 7%–13%. Analysis of private and group supplies revealed evolving trends: from 2000 to 2006, 21% of fluoride testing results were <i>satisfactory</i> and 75% <i>marginal</i>, while the 2007–2016 period showed 39% <i>satisfactory</i> and 48% <i>unsatisfactory</i> results, though only 1% exceeded 0.9 mg/L.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>The fluoride control in PWS has been largely effective, with consistent improvements in monitoring practices and compliance with target levels over the study period.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":10580,"journal":{"name":"Community dentistry and oral epidemiology","volume":"54 4","pages":"418-426"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/cdoe.70055","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Community dentistry and oral epidemiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/cdoe.70055","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/28 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background/Aim

The Health (Fluoridation of Water Supplies) Act of 1960 in Ireland mandates monthly fluoride sampling in Public Water Supplies (PWS). In 2007, authorities adjusted the mandated fluoride concentration from 0.8–1.0 to 0.6–0.8 mg/L. Approximately 71% of the Irish population has access to fluoridated drinking water. This study aimed to analyse fluoride measurements in Irish water supplies for five decades (1964–2016) to assess compliance and effectiveness of the fluoridation programme.

Methods

Data were sourced from government records and Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) reports. Analysis focused on fluoride concentration measurements, compliance rates, and data completeness across public, private, and group water supplies. Descriptive statistics were used to evaluate trends and patterns in fluoride levels over time.

Results

By 2000, over 90% (n = 307) of PWS, each serving more than 1000 persons, were fluoridated. In the early monitoring period (1964–69), missing data were substantial at 66%, with satisfactory fluoride results (0.8–1.00 mg/L) at only 17% and marginal results (0.70–0.80 and > 1.00–1.10 mg/L) at 15%. Compliance improved steadily, reaching peak performance in 1994–99 with 57% satisfactory results. Following the 2007 adjustment in target concentrations, missing data decreased significantly to 18%, with satisfactory results (0.60–0.80 mg/L) increasing from 40% to 49% and marginal results (0.50–0.60 mg/L and > 0.80–0.90 mg/L) stabilising at 7%–13%. Analysis of private and group supplies revealed evolving trends: from 2000 to 2006, 21% of fluoride testing results were satisfactory and 75% marginal, while the 2007–2016 period showed 39% satisfactory and 48% unsatisfactory results, though only 1% exceeded 0.9 mg/L.

Conclusion

The fluoride control in PWS has been largely effective, with consistent improvements in monitoring practices and compliance with target levels over the study period.

Abstract Image

爱尔兰供水中氟化物水平的纵向分析:52年回顾
背景/目的爱尔兰1960年《保健(供水氟化)法》规定,每月对公共供水进行氟化物取样。2007年,当局将规定的氟化物浓度从0.8-1.0毫克/升调整为0.6-0.8毫克/升。大约71%的爱尔兰人口可以获得含氟饮用水。本研究旨在分析五十年(1964-2016)爱尔兰供水中的氟化物测量值,以评估氟化计划的合规性和有效性。方法数据来源于政府记录和美国环境保护署(EPA)报告。分析的重点是公共、私人和集团供水的氟化物浓度测量、合规率和数据完整性。描述性统计用于评估氟化物水平随时间变化的趋势和模式。结果到2000年,超过90%(307例)的PWS(每人1000人以上)进行了氟化处理。在早期监测期间(1964-69),66%的数据缺失,满意的氟化物结果(0.8-1.00 mg/L)仅为17%,边缘结果(0.70-0.80和>; 1.00-1.10 mg/L)为15%。依从性稳步提高,在1994-99年达到顶峰,满意度达到57%。2007年调整目标浓度后,缺失数据显著下降至18%,满意结果(0.60-0.80 mg/L)从40%增加至49%,边缘结果(0.50-0.60 mg/L和0.80-0.90 mg/L)稳定在7%-13%。对私人和团体供应的分析显示出不断变化的趋势:从2000年到2006年,21%的氟化物检测结果满意,75%的氟化物检测结果不合格,而2007年至2016年期间,39%的氟化物检测结果满意,48%的氟化物检测结果不合格,但只有1%的氟化物检测结果超过0.9 mg/L。结论PWS的氟化物控制总体上是有效的,在研究期间监测实践不断改进,符合目标水平。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Community dentistry and oral epidemiology
Community dentistry and oral epidemiology 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
8.70%
发文量
82
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: The aim of Community Dentistry and Oral Epidemiology is to serve as a forum for scientifically based information in community dentistry, with the intention of continually expanding the knowledge base in the field. The scope is therefore broad, ranging from original studies in epidemiology, behavioral sciences related to dentistry, and health services research through to methodological reports in program planning, implementation and evaluation. Reports dealing with people of all age groups are welcome. The journal encourages manuscripts which present methodologically detailed scientific research findings from original data collection or analysis of existing databases. Preference is given to new findings. Confirmations of previous findings can be of value, but the journal seeks to avoid needless repetition. It also encourages thoughtful, provocative commentaries on subjects ranging from research methods to public policies. Purely descriptive reports are not encouraged, nor are behavioral science reports with only marginal application to dentistry. The journal is published bimonthly.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书