From terra nullius to Silicon Valley: Tracing Utopian Thought in Theresia Enzensberger's Auf See (2022)

IF 0.1 3区 文学 0 LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS
GERMAN QUARTERLY Pub Date : 2026-07-31 Epub Date: 2026-07-13 DOI:10.1111/gequ.70048
Theresa Sambruno Spannhoff
{"title":"From terra nullius to Silicon Valley: Tracing Utopian Thought in Theresia Enzensberger's Auf See (2022)","authors":"Theresa Sambruno Spannhoff","doi":"10.1111/gequ.70048","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>This article reads Theresia Enzensberger's 2022 novel <i>Auf See</i> as a critique of contemporary techno-utopian thinking. Through the artificial island <i>VINETA</i>, modeled on Silicon Valley libertarian projects like <i>The Seasteading Institute</i>, the novel traces a historical continuity between colonial <i>terra nullius</i> ideology and today's “blue acceleration” of commercial maritime expansion. Drawing on utopian theories from Bloch to Bauman, the article argues that <i>VINETA</i> exemplifies a shift in utopian ideals from promoting social emancipation toward technological progress. The latter, under the guise of innovation, reproduces the colonial logics of environmental resource appropriation. The article further examines how Berlin's Tiergarten briefly offers an alternative, precarious dwelling model that eschews utopian projection, before being reclaimed by the same <i>terra nullius</i> imagination it temporarily escaped. Ultimately, <i>Auf See</i> diagnoses Western utopian thought as inseparable from its colonial foundations and questions its capacity to imagine societal continuation outside of utopian ideals.</p>","PeriodicalId":54057,"journal":{"name":"GERMAN QUARTERLY","volume":"99 2","pages":"106-118"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"GERMAN QUARTERLY","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/gequ.70048","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/7/13 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article reads Theresia Enzensberger's 2022 novel Auf See as a critique of contemporary techno-utopian thinking. Through the artificial island VINETA, modeled on Silicon Valley libertarian projects like The Seasteading Institute, the novel traces a historical continuity between colonial terra nullius ideology and today's “blue acceleration” of commercial maritime expansion. Drawing on utopian theories from Bloch to Bauman, the article argues that VINETA exemplifies a shift in utopian ideals from promoting social emancipation toward technological progress. The latter, under the guise of innovation, reproduces the colonial logics of environmental resource appropriation. The article further examines how Berlin's Tiergarten briefly offers an alternative, precarious dwelling model that eschews utopian projection, before being reclaimed by the same terra nullius imagination it temporarily escaped. Ultimately, Auf See diagnoses Western utopian thought as inseparable from its colonial foundations and questions its capacity to imagine societal continuation outside of utopian ideals.

从无主之地到硅谷:追寻特蕾西娅·恩岑斯伯格《Auf See》(2022)中的乌托邦思想
本文将特蕾西亚·恩森斯伯格(Theresia Enzensberger) 2022年出版的小说《透视》(Auf See)视为对当代技术乌托邦思想的批判。通过模仿硅谷自由主义项目(如Seasteading Institute)的人工岛屿VINETA,小说追溯了殖民时期无主地(terra nullius)意识形态与今天商业海上扩张的“蓝色加速”之间的历史连续性。文章借鉴了从布洛赫到鲍曼的乌托邦理论,认为VINETA体现了乌托邦理想从促进社会解放向技术进步的转变。后者打着创新的幌子,再现了环境资源侵占的殖民逻辑。这篇文章进一步探讨了柏林的Tiergarten是如何提供一种替代的、不稳定的居住模式,避免了乌托邦式的投射,在被它暂时逃脱的同样的无主想象所回收之前。最终,Auf See将西方乌托邦思想诊断为与其殖民基础密不可分,并质疑其在乌托邦理想之外想象社会延续的能力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
GERMAN QUARTERLY
GERMAN QUARTERLY Multiple-
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
33.30%
发文量
55
期刊介绍: The German Quarterly serves as a forum for all sorts of scholarly debates - topical, ideological, methodological, theoretical, of both the established and the experimental variety, as well as debates on recent developments in the profession. We particularly encourage essays employing new theoretical or methodological approaches, essays on recent developments in the field, and essays on subjects that have recently been underrepresented in The German Quarterly, such as studies on pre-modern subjects.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书