The Omnicausal Model Reveals the Highly Polyfactorial Nature of Complex Diseases

IF 3.4 4区 医学 Q3 GENETICS & HEREDITY
Carla Márquez-Luna, Martin Tournaire, Ghislain Rocheleau, Ron Do, Marie Verbanck
{"title":"The Omnicausal Model Reveals the Highly Polyfactorial Nature of Complex Diseases","authors":"Carla Márquez-Luna,&nbsp;Martin Tournaire,&nbsp;Ghislain Rocheleau,&nbsp;Ron Do,&nbsp;Marie Verbanck","doi":"10.1002/gepi.70052","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Mendelian randomization (MR) is a human genetics method for inferring causal relationships between risk factors and diseases. A common focus of MR studies has been on the causal inference of a single risk factor on a single disease. This has led to the successful discovery of numerous causal risk factors for disease. However, it remains unclear how much each causal risk factor contributes to disease collectively. Here, we introduce the concept of “causality explained,” that provides an estimator of the causal variance explained by a phenome-wide set of risk factors on complex diseases to assess how much causality can be potentially explained. The model is based on principal component regression which is a multivariate linear regression based on principal component analysis. In complement, we propose the “polyfactorial index” to assess the trajectory of causality explained as risk factors are sequentially added into the model, to characterize the causal architecture for a complex disease. We demonstrate that our model correctly assesses the causality explained and causal architecture in simulations across a wide range of parameters. To build our model, we used a phenome-wide set of 222 traits from the UK Biobank compared to a set of 5 known risk factors for coronary artery disease. We observed that the phenome-wide set explains more than 45% of causality compared to 28.76% for the set of known risk factors. In addition, we tested our approach on 13 complex diseases and showed that the phenome-wide set can explain between 27% for anorexia to 80% for schizophrenia, with ever increasing trajectories of causality explained. We propose the “omnicausal model,” which posits that a large number of risk factors individually explains a small amount to disease but collectively explain most of the causal variance. We distinguished core and peripheral causal factors that explain respectively a larger and a smaller part of causal variance. This approach provides insights into the underlying causal architecture between risk factors and disease.</p>","PeriodicalId":12710,"journal":{"name":"Genetic Epidemiology","volume":"50 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/gepi.70052","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Genetic Epidemiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/gepi.70052","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GENETICS & HEREDITY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Mendelian randomization (MR) is a human genetics method for inferring causal relationships between risk factors and diseases. A common focus of MR studies has been on the causal inference of a single risk factor on a single disease. This has led to the successful discovery of numerous causal risk factors for disease. However, it remains unclear how much each causal risk factor contributes to disease collectively. Here, we introduce the concept of “causality explained,” that provides an estimator of the causal variance explained by a phenome-wide set of risk factors on complex diseases to assess how much causality can be potentially explained. The model is based on principal component regression which is a multivariate linear regression based on principal component analysis. In complement, we propose the “polyfactorial index” to assess the trajectory of causality explained as risk factors are sequentially added into the model, to characterize the causal architecture for a complex disease. We demonstrate that our model correctly assesses the causality explained and causal architecture in simulations across a wide range of parameters. To build our model, we used a phenome-wide set of 222 traits from the UK Biobank compared to a set of 5 known risk factors for coronary artery disease. We observed that the phenome-wide set explains more than 45% of causality compared to 28.76% for the set of known risk factors. In addition, we tested our approach on 13 complex diseases and showed that the phenome-wide set can explain between 27% for anorexia to 80% for schizophrenia, with ever increasing trajectories of causality explained. We propose the “omnicausal model,” which posits that a large number of risk factors individually explains a small amount to disease but collectively explain most of the causal variance. We distinguished core and peripheral causal factors that explain respectively a larger and a smaller part of causal variance. This approach provides insights into the underlying causal architecture between risk factors and disease.

Abstract Image

全因果模型揭示了复杂疾病的高度多因素性质
孟德尔随机化(MR)是一种推断危险因素与疾病之间因果关系的人类遗传学方法。核磁共振研究的一个共同焦点是单一风险因素对单一疾病的因果推断。这导致成功地发现了许多疾病的因果风险因素。然而,目前尚不清楚每种因果风险因素在多大程度上共同导致疾病。在这里,我们引入了“因果关系解释”的概念,它提供了一个由现象范围内的一系列复杂疾病风险因素解释的因果差异的估计值,以评估有多少因果关系可以潜在地解释。该模型基于主成分回归,即基于主成分分析的多元线性回归。作为补充,我们提出了“多因子指数”来评估因果关系的轨迹,因为风险因素被依次添加到模型中,以表征复杂疾病的因果结构。我们证明了我们的模型正确地评估了在广泛参数范围内模拟的因果关系和因果结构。为了建立我们的模型,我们使用了来自英国生物银行的222个全现象特征,与一组已知的5个冠状动脉疾病危险因素进行了比较。我们观察到,现象范围的集合解释了45%以上的因果关系,而已知风险因素的集合解释了28.76%。此外,我们在13种复杂疾病上测试了我们的方法,结果表明,全现象集可以解释厌食症的27%到精神分裂症的80%,因果关系的解释轨迹也在不断增加。我们提出了“全因果模型”,它假设大量的风险因素单独解释了一小部分疾病,但集体解释了大多数因果差异。我们区分了核心因素和外围因素,它们分别解释了较大和较小的因果方差。这种方法提供了对风险因素和疾病之间潜在因果结构的见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Genetic Epidemiology
Genetic Epidemiology 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
9.50%
发文量
49
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Genetic Epidemiology is a peer-reviewed journal for discussion of research on the genetic causes of the distribution of human traits in families and populations. Emphasis is placed on the relative contribution of genetic and environmental factors to human disease as revealed by genetic, epidemiological, and biologic investigations. Genetic Epidemiology primarily publishes papers in statistical genetics, a research field that is primarily concerned with development of statistical, bioinformatical, and computational models for analyzing genetic data. Incorporation of underlying biology and population genetics into conceptual models is favored. The Journal seeks original articles comprising either applied research or innovative statistical, mathematical, computational, or genomic methodologies that advance studies in genetic epidemiology. Other types of reports are encouraged, such as letters to the editor, topic reviews, and perspectives from other fields of research that will likely enrich the field of genetic epidemiology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书