Evaluation framework for assessing the quality and safety of artificial intelligence solutions for the acute care surgeon: a narrative review from the Eastern Association for the Surgery of Trauma quality, safety, and outcomes committee.

IF 2.5 Q3 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE
Trauma Surgery & Acute Care Open Pub Date : 2026-07-30 eCollection Date: 2026-01-01 DOI:10.1136/tsaco-2025-002163
Tandis Soltani, Phillip Kim, William Ian McKinley, Lane Frasier, Phillip Dowzicky, Daniel N Holena, Rachael A Callcut
{"title":"Evaluation framework for assessing the quality and safety of artificial intelligence solutions for the acute care surgeon: a narrative review from the Eastern Association for the Surgery of Trauma quality, safety, and outcomes committee.","authors":"Tandis Soltani, Phillip Kim, William Ian McKinley, Lane Frasier, Phillip Dowzicky, Daniel N Holena, Rachael A Callcut","doi":"10.1136/tsaco-2025-002163","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Artificial intelligence (AI) has been developing as a field for decades. As acute care surgeons, we have been using AI in the clinical realm and in our everyday lives for years. However, with the public release of conversational large language models, there has been a rapid increase in the uptake of AI, with numerous new products on the market and evolving conversations around what this means for the future of surgery. Given acute care surgeons are leaders in healthcare systems, interfacing with patients and impacting quality and safety through critical timepoints in the emergency department, operating rooms, wards, and intensive care units, it is imperative that we have an understanding of this technology, its potential for bias, its assessment and implementation, and its governance. In this review, we cover these critical concepts and aim to provide a framework for acute care surgeons to understand and evaluate the quality and safety of AI solutions.</p>","PeriodicalId":23307,"journal":{"name":"Trauma Surgery & Acute Care Open","volume":"11 3","pages":"e002163"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13422816/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Trauma Surgery & Acute Care Open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/tsaco-2025-002163","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Artificial intelligence (AI) has been developing as a field for decades. As acute care surgeons, we have been using AI in the clinical realm and in our everyday lives for years. However, with the public release of conversational large language models, there has been a rapid increase in the uptake of AI, with numerous new products on the market and evolving conversations around what this means for the future of surgery. Given acute care surgeons are leaders in healthcare systems, interfacing with patients and impacting quality and safety through critical timepoints in the emergency department, operating rooms, wards, and intensive care units, it is imperative that we have an understanding of this technology, its potential for bias, its assessment and implementation, and its governance. In this review, we cover these critical concepts and aim to provide a framework for acute care surgeons to understand and evaluate the quality and safety of AI solutions.

评估急性护理外科医生人工智能解决方案的质量和安全性的评估框架:来自东部创伤外科协会质量、安全性和结果委员会的叙述性综述。
人工智能(AI)作为一个领域已经发展了几十年。作为急症护理外科医生,我们多年来一直在临床领域和日常生活中使用人工智能。然而,随着对话式大型语言模型的公开发布,人工智能的应用迅速增加,市场上出现了许多新产品,围绕这对未来外科手术意味着什么展开了不断发展的讨论。鉴于急症外科医生是医疗保健系统的领导者,在急诊科、手术室、病房和重症监护病房的关键时间点与患者接触并影响质量和安全,我们必须了解这项技术,其潜在的偏见,其评估和实施以及治理。在这篇综述中,我们涵盖了这些关键概念,旨在为急症护理外科医生提供一个框架,以了解和评估人工智能解决方案的质量和安全性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
5.00%
发文量
71
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书