Regulation of pulsatile secretion of progesterone during the human luteal phase.

Clinical reproduction and fertility Pub Date : 1986-04-01
P A Steele, W Braund, S J Judd
{"title":"Regulation of pulsatile secretion of progesterone during the human luteal phase.","authors":"P A Steele,&nbsp;W Braund,&nbsp;S J Judd","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study was designed to evaluate the role of luteinizing hormone (LH) and prolactin (PRL) in regulating pulsatile progesterone secretion in the human. This was done first by correlating the frequency of progesterone, LH and PRL pulses during the mid-luteal phase of normal cycles. Second, by increasing the frequency of LH pulses with naloxone and GnRH injections and examining the impact on progesterone pulse frequency. Third, by abolishing PRL pulsatility with metoclopramide and looking at the effect on progesterone pulsatility. Nine normal subjects in the mid-luteal phase (4-10 days after the initial postovulatory rise in progesterone) were studied for 8 h with blood samples taken at 15 min intervals. Each sample was assayed for progesterone, LH and PRL and the pulse frequency (number of pulses in 8 h) determined for each hormone. The mean pulse frequencies were 2.3 (s.e.m. = 0.4) for progesterone, 1.3 (s.e.m. = 0.4) for LH, and 2.1 (s.e.m. = 0.3) for PRL. Cross-correlation analysis showed that there was no significant synchrony between pulses of progesterone and pulses of LH and PRL. When naloxone was given to six normal subjects in the mid-luteal phase, the mean LH pulse frequency (number of pulses in 6 h) was increased from 2.2 (s.e.m. = 0.3) during a saline infusion to 3.2 (s.e.m. = 0.5) during the naloxone infusion (P less than 0.05). However, the mean pulse frequency for progesterone remained unchanged during the saline and naloxone studies. There was no significant difference between the mean serum LH in the saline and naloxone groups, and the mean serum progesterone concentration was not significantly altered.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)</p>","PeriodicalId":10478,"journal":{"name":"Clinical reproduction and fertility","volume":"4 2","pages":"117-24"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1986-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical reproduction and fertility","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study was designed to evaluate the role of luteinizing hormone (LH) and prolactin (PRL) in regulating pulsatile progesterone secretion in the human. This was done first by correlating the frequency of progesterone, LH and PRL pulses during the mid-luteal phase of normal cycles. Second, by increasing the frequency of LH pulses with naloxone and GnRH injections and examining the impact on progesterone pulse frequency. Third, by abolishing PRL pulsatility with metoclopramide and looking at the effect on progesterone pulsatility. Nine normal subjects in the mid-luteal phase (4-10 days after the initial postovulatory rise in progesterone) were studied for 8 h with blood samples taken at 15 min intervals. Each sample was assayed for progesterone, LH and PRL and the pulse frequency (number of pulses in 8 h) determined for each hormone. The mean pulse frequencies were 2.3 (s.e.m. = 0.4) for progesterone, 1.3 (s.e.m. = 0.4) for LH, and 2.1 (s.e.m. = 0.3) for PRL. Cross-correlation analysis showed that there was no significant synchrony between pulses of progesterone and pulses of LH and PRL. When naloxone was given to six normal subjects in the mid-luteal phase, the mean LH pulse frequency (number of pulses in 6 h) was increased from 2.2 (s.e.m. = 0.3) during a saline infusion to 3.2 (s.e.m. = 0.5) during the naloxone infusion (P less than 0.05). However, the mean pulse frequency for progesterone remained unchanged during the saline and naloxone studies. There was no significant difference between the mean serum LH in the saline and naloxone groups, and the mean serum progesterone concentration was not significantly altered.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

黄体期黄体酮脉动分泌的调节。
本研究旨在探讨促黄体生成素(LH)和催乳素(PRL)在调节人体脉动性孕酮分泌中的作用。这首先是通过在正常周期的黄体中期将黄体酮、LH和PRL脉冲的频率相关联来完成的。其次,通过纳洛酮和GnRH注射增加LH脉冲频率,并检查对孕激素脉冲频率的影响。第三,通过甲氧氯普胺消除PRL搏动并观察对黄体酮搏动的影响。9名正常受试者处于黄体中期(排卵后黄体酮首次升高后4-10天),研究8小时,每隔15分钟采血一次。每个样品检测黄体酮、LH和PRL,并测定每种激素的脉冲频率(8小时内的脉冲次数)。黄体酮平均脉搏频率为2.3 (s.e.m. = 0.4), LH为1.3 (s.e.m. = 0.4), PRL为2.1 (s.e.m. = 0.3)。交叉相关分析显示,黄体酮与LH、PRL脉搏无明显同行性。6例正常受试者在黄体中期给予纳洛酮,6 h内平均LH脉频(脉冲数)由生理盐水输注时的2.2次(s.e.m. = 0.3)增加到纳洛酮输注时的3.2次(s.e.m. = 0.5) (P < 0.05)。然而,在生理盐水和纳洛酮的研究中,黄体酮的平均脉搏频率保持不变。生理盐水组和纳洛酮组平均血清LH水平无显著差异,平均血清黄体酮水平无显著变化。(摘要删节250字)
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信