Survival of Older Adults Choosing Dialysis or Conservative Kidney Management, Stratified by Suitability for Dialysis

IF 4.1 Q1 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY
Kidney Medicine Pub Date : 2026-08-01 Epub Date: 2026-06-12 DOI:10.1016/j.xkme.2026.101430
Micha Jongejan, Marjolijn van Buren, Wouter R. Verberne, Gurbey Ocak, Willem Jan W. Bos
{"title":"Survival of Older Adults Choosing Dialysis or Conservative Kidney Management, Stratified by Suitability for Dialysis","authors":"Micha Jongejan,&nbsp;Marjolijn van Buren,&nbsp;Wouter R. Verberne,&nbsp;Gurbey Ocak,&nbsp;Willem Jan W. Bos","doi":"10.1016/j.xkme.2026.101430","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Rationale &amp; Objective</h3><div>Previous studies indicate survival benefit for dialysis over conservative kidney management (CKM), which attenuates in patients ≥80 years or with high comorbidity. Most studies did not differentiate dialysis suitability among those choosing CKM, potentially biasing outcomes. We aimed to describe survival outcomes in patients choosing dialysis, patients suitable for dialysis who chose CKM, and patients less suitable for dialysis who chose CKM.</div></div><div><h3>Study design</h3><div>Single-center cohort study.</div></div><div><h3>Setting &amp; Participants</h3><div>We included patients aged ≥65 years with a documented treatment decision for dialysis or CKM between 2017 and 2024.</div></div><div><h3>Exposure</h3><div>Chosen treatment (dialysis or CKM). Patients choosing CKM were classified as suitable or less suitable for dialysis, based on the treating nephrologist’s.</div></div><div><h3>Outcome</h3><div>The primary outcome was all-cause mortality.</div></div><div><h3>Analytical Approach</h3><div>Descriptive, using Kaplan–Meier estimates and Cox proportional hazard models without adjustment for confounding.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Median survival from treatment decision was 53 (dialysis), 32 (CKM, suitable for dialysis), and 18 months (CKM, less suitable for dialysis), with unadjusted hazard ratios of 2.11 (CKM, suitable for dialysis vs dialysis; 95% CI 1.59-2.80) and 3.23 (less suitable for dialysis vs dialysis; 95% CI 2.47-4.23). Among patients aged ≥80 years, hazard ratios were 1.89 (0.99-1.74) for CKM suitable for dialysis versus dialysis and 2.35 (1.31-4.64) for CKM less suitable for dialysis versus dialysis. Thirteen percent of patients who initially chose dialysis switched to CKM, whereas 1% transitioned from CKM to dialysis.</div></div><div><h3>Limitations</h3><div>Subjectivity in dialysis suitability assessment.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>In this cohort of older patients with kidney failure, survival outcomes in patients choosing CKM suitable for dialysis were longer than previously reported. These findings highlight the importance of distinguishing dialysis suitability when evaluating survival outcomes in CKM and dialysis. This supports more individualized shared decision making in older adults with advanced kidney disease.</div></div><div><h3>Plain-Language Summary</h3><div>Older adults with advanced kidney disease often face a difficult decision whether to choose dialysis or conservative kidney management (CKM). Earlier studies did not clarify whether patients opting for CKM were medically eligible for dialysis, making results less applicable for people who face a genuine choice between treatments. This study described survival outcomes in people aged 65 years and older. People who chose dialysis lived about 53 months after making their treatment decision, people who chose CKM and were considered suitable for dialysis lived about 32 months, and people who chose CKM and were considered less suitable for dialysis lived about 18 months. These findings support individualized shared decision making and highlight the importance of considering dialysis suitability.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":17885,"journal":{"name":"Kidney Medicine","volume":"8 8","pages":"Article 101430"},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13416626/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Kidney Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590059526001925","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/6/12 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Rationale & Objective

Previous studies indicate survival benefit for dialysis over conservative kidney management (CKM), which attenuates in patients ≥80 years or with high comorbidity. Most studies did not differentiate dialysis suitability among those choosing CKM, potentially biasing outcomes. We aimed to describe survival outcomes in patients choosing dialysis, patients suitable for dialysis who chose CKM, and patients less suitable for dialysis who chose CKM.

Study design

Single-center cohort study.

Setting & Participants

We included patients aged ≥65 years with a documented treatment decision for dialysis or CKM between 2017 and 2024.

Exposure

Chosen treatment (dialysis or CKM). Patients choosing CKM were classified as suitable or less suitable for dialysis, based on the treating nephrologist’s.

Outcome

The primary outcome was all-cause mortality.

Analytical Approach

Descriptive, using Kaplan–Meier estimates and Cox proportional hazard models without adjustment for confounding.

Results

Median survival from treatment decision was 53 (dialysis), 32 (CKM, suitable for dialysis), and 18 months (CKM, less suitable for dialysis), with unadjusted hazard ratios of 2.11 (CKM, suitable for dialysis vs dialysis; 95% CI 1.59-2.80) and 3.23 (less suitable for dialysis vs dialysis; 95% CI 2.47-4.23). Among patients aged ≥80 years, hazard ratios were 1.89 (0.99-1.74) for CKM suitable for dialysis versus dialysis and 2.35 (1.31-4.64) for CKM less suitable for dialysis versus dialysis. Thirteen percent of patients who initially chose dialysis switched to CKM, whereas 1% transitioned from CKM to dialysis.

Limitations

Subjectivity in dialysis suitability assessment.

Conclusions

In this cohort of older patients with kidney failure, survival outcomes in patients choosing CKM suitable for dialysis were longer than previously reported. These findings highlight the importance of distinguishing dialysis suitability when evaluating survival outcomes in CKM and dialysis. This supports more individualized shared decision making in older adults with advanced kidney disease.

Plain-Language Summary

Older adults with advanced kidney disease often face a difficult decision whether to choose dialysis or conservative kidney management (CKM). Earlier studies did not clarify whether patients opting for CKM were medically eligible for dialysis, making results less applicable for people who face a genuine choice between treatments. This study described survival outcomes in people aged 65 years and older. People who chose dialysis lived about 53 months after making their treatment decision, people who chose CKM and were considered suitable for dialysis lived about 32 months, and people who chose CKM and were considered less suitable for dialysis lived about 18 months. These findings support individualized shared decision making and highlight the importance of considering dialysis suitability.
选择透析或保守肾管理的老年人的生存,按透析的适宜性分层。
理由与目的:先前的研究表明,透析比保守肾管理(CKM)的生存获益,在≥80岁或有高合并症的患者中减弱。大多数研究没有区分选择CKM的患者是否适合透析,这可能会导致结果偏倚。我们的目的是描述选择透析的患者的生存结局,适合透析的患者选择CKM,不适合透析的患者选择CKM。研究设计:单中心队列研究。环境和参与者:我们纳入了年龄≥65岁且在2017年至2024年间有透析或CKM治疗决定的患者。暴露:选择治疗方法(透析或CKM)。选择CKM的患者根据治疗肾病专家的意见分为适合或不太适合透析。结局:主要结局为全因死亡率。分析方法:描述性,使用Kaplan-Meier估计和Cox比例风险模型,不调整混杂因素。结果:治疗决定的中位生存期为53(透析),32 (CKM,适合透析)和18个月(CKM,不太适合透析),未经调整的风险比为2.11 (CKM,适合透析vs透析;95% CI为1.59-2.80)和3.23(不太适合透析vs透析;95% CI为2.47-4.23)。在年龄≥80岁的患者中,适合透析的CKM与透析的风险比为1.89(0.99-1.74),不适合透析的CKM与透析的风险比为2.35(1.31-4.64)。最初选择透析的患者中有13%转为CKM,而1%从CKM转为透析。局限性:透析适宜性评价的主观性。结论:在这个老年肾衰竭患者队列中,选择适合透析的CKM患者的生存结果比先前报道的要长。这些发现强调了在评估CKM和透析的生存结果时区分透析适宜性的重要性。这为晚期肾脏疾病的老年人提供了更个性化的共同决策支持。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Kidney Medicine
Kidney Medicine Medicine-Internal Medicine
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
5.10%
发文量
176
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书