Income-related inequalities in ACSC hospitalization in Canada: evidence from 2005-2019 surveys linked with hospitalization and tax data.

IF 3.1 3区 医学 Q1 ECONOMICS
Nazire Begen, M Karen Campbell, Rose Anne Devlin, Saverio Stranges, Sisira Sarma
{"title":"Income-related inequalities in ACSC hospitalization in Canada: evidence from 2005-2019 surveys linked with hospitalization and tax data.","authors":"Nazire Begen, M Karen Campbell, Rose Anne Devlin, Saverio Stranges, Sisira Sarma","doi":"10.1007/s10198-026-01961-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study examines income-related inequalities in hospitalizations due to ambulatory care-sensitive conditions (ACSCs) in Canada, using linked data from the Canadian Community Health Surveys (2005-2019), the Discharge Abstract Database, and the T1 Family File across nine provinces. We quantify inequalities in ACSC hospitalizations using the Erreygers concentration index (ECI) and ACSC hospitalization costs using the standard concentration index (CI). The recentered influence function-ordinary least squares estimator (RIF-CI/ECI-OLS) was used to decompose income inequalities in ACSC hospitalizations. Additionally, the RIF-based Blinder-Oaxaca (BO) method decomposes disparities by sex, age, income, and rurality. ECI/CI findings reveal that ACSC hospitalizations are disproportionately concentrated among lower-income individuals (ECI: -0.0040 to -0.0060; CI: -0.2519 to -0.3957). Individuals above the low-income cut-off group (ECI: -0.0040 to -0.0051; CI: -0.2582, to -0.3465), older adults (ECI: -0.0033 to -0.0178; CI: -0.0806 to -0.3631) and those living in rural areas (ECI: -0.0057 to -0.0112; CI: -0.2779 to -0.3829) experience relatively greater inequalities. Individuals aged 66-74 years, those with less than secondary education, those with multimorbidity, and widowed, separated, and divorced individuals are associated with increased inequality, whereas those from the low-income cut-off group and immigrants are associated with reduced inequality. The RIF-based BO decomposition analysis reveals significant income-related inequalities in ACSC hospitalization and ACSC hospitalization costs by age and rurality. Our findings suggest that targeted policies may be necessary to enhance access to primary care for older adults, individuals with multimorbidity, low-income individuals, and those living in rural areas.</p>","PeriodicalId":51416,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Health Economics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Health Economics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10198-026-01961-0","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study examines income-related inequalities in hospitalizations due to ambulatory care-sensitive conditions (ACSCs) in Canada, using linked data from the Canadian Community Health Surveys (2005-2019), the Discharge Abstract Database, and the T1 Family File across nine provinces. We quantify inequalities in ACSC hospitalizations using the Erreygers concentration index (ECI) and ACSC hospitalization costs using the standard concentration index (CI). The recentered influence function-ordinary least squares estimator (RIF-CI/ECI-OLS) was used to decompose income inequalities in ACSC hospitalizations. Additionally, the RIF-based Blinder-Oaxaca (BO) method decomposes disparities by sex, age, income, and rurality. ECI/CI findings reveal that ACSC hospitalizations are disproportionately concentrated among lower-income individuals (ECI: -0.0040 to -0.0060; CI: -0.2519 to -0.3957). Individuals above the low-income cut-off group (ECI: -0.0040 to -0.0051; CI: -0.2582, to -0.3465), older adults (ECI: -0.0033 to -0.0178; CI: -0.0806 to -0.3631) and those living in rural areas (ECI: -0.0057 to -0.0112; CI: -0.2779 to -0.3829) experience relatively greater inequalities. Individuals aged 66-74 years, those with less than secondary education, those with multimorbidity, and widowed, separated, and divorced individuals are associated with increased inequality, whereas those from the low-income cut-off group and immigrants are associated with reduced inequality. The RIF-based BO decomposition analysis reveals significant income-related inequalities in ACSC hospitalization and ACSC hospitalization costs by age and rurality. Our findings suggest that targeted policies may be necessary to enhance access to primary care for older adults, individuals with multimorbidity, low-income individuals, and those living in rural areas.

加拿大ACSC住院中与收入相关的不平等:与住院和税收数据相关的2005-2019年调查的证据
本研究利用加拿大社区卫生调查(2005-2019)、出院摘要数据库和9个省的T1家庭档案的相关数据,研究了加拿大门诊敏感疾病(ACSCs)导致的住院治疗中与收入相关的不平等。我们使用Erreygers浓度指数(ECI)量化ACSC住院的不平等,使用标准浓度指数(CI)量化ACSC住院费用。使用重中心影响函数-普通最小二乘估计量(RIF-CI/ECI-OLS)来分解ACSC住院的收入不平等。此外,基于rif的Blinder-Oaxaca (BO)方法分解了性别、年龄、收入和农村地区的差异。ECI/CI结果显示,ACSC住院不成比例地集中在低收入个体中(ECI: -0.0040至-0.0060;CI: -0.2519至-0.3957)。高于低收入临界值组(ECI: -0.0040至-0.0051;CI: -0.2582至-0.3465)、老年人(ECI: -0.0033至-0.0178;CI: -0.0806至-0.3631)和生活在农村地区的人(ECI: -0.0057至-0.0112;CI: -0.2779至-0.3829)经历的不平等相对更大。年龄在66-74岁之间的人、受教育程度低于中等的人、患有多种疾病的人、丧偶、分居和离婚的人与不平等加剧有关,而来自低收入切断群体和移民的人与不平等程度降低有关。基于rif的BO分解分析显示,按年龄和农村划分,ACSC住院和ACSC住院费用存在显著的收入相关不平等。我们的研究结果表明,有针对性的政策可能是必要的,以提高老年人、多种疾病患者、低收入人群和农村地区人群获得初级保健的机会。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
2.30%
发文量
131
期刊介绍: The European Journal of Health Economics is a journal of Health Economics and associated disciplines. The growing demand for health economics and the introduction of new guidelines in various European countries were the motivation to generate a highly scientific and at the same time practice oriented journal considering the requirements of various health care systems in Europe. The international scientific board of opinion leaders guarantees high-quality, peer-reviewed publications as well as articles for pragmatic approaches in the field of health economics. We intend to cover all aspects of health economics: • Basics of health economic approaches and methods • Pharmacoeconomics • Health Care Systems • Pricing and Reimbursement Systems • Quality-of-Life-Studies The editors reserve the right to reject manuscripts that do not comply with the above-mentioned requirements. The author will be held responsible for false statements or for failure to fulfill the above-mentioned requirements. Officially cited as: Eur J Health Econ
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书