The 2025 National Institute of Health Budget Cuts and the Future of Radiology Innovation: Implications for the Physician-Scientist Pipeline and Research Paradigms

IF 4.7 2区 医学 Q1 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Academic Radiology Pub Date : 2026-10-01 Epub Date: 2026-07-27 DOI:10.1016/j.acra.2026.07.009
Ali Rashidi MD, Patricia Balthazar MD, MPH, Elizabeth A. Krupinski PhD, FSPIE, FSIIM, FATA, FAIMBE, FAUR
{"title":"The 2025 National Institute of Health Budget Cuts and the Future of Radiology Innovation: Implications for the Physician-Scientist Pipeline and Research Paradigms","authors":"Ali Rashidi MD,&nbsp;Patricia Balthazar MD, MPH,&nbsp;Elizabeth A. Krupinski PhD, FSPIE, FSIIM, FATA, FAIMBE, FAUR","doi":"10.1016/j.acra.2026.07.009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The United States National Institutes of Health (NIH) serves as the cornerstone of biomedical research funding. Yet, radiology departments receive a disproportionately small share of this support, concentrated among senior investigators at large academic institutions. Beginning in January 2025, the current administration proposed an approximately 40% reduction in federal research funding, equivalent to a $20 billion decrease, and implemented the termination or freezing of over 2500 grants, representing $1.4 billion in research loss, alongside a proposed 15% mandatory cap on indirect cost recovery. This perspective examines the potential consequences of these administrative changes on the radiology physician-scientist pipeline and the future of imaging research and innovation. Research Project Grant success rates are projected to decline from 18.5% in fiscal year (FY) 2024 to a historic low of 7.3% by FY 2026, compounding the already widening gap between established and early-career investigators. Radiology-specific training pathways remain critically undersubscribed, with the Holman Research Pathway averaging only 1.6 graduates per year over 20 years. The systematic erosion of NIH training grants and dropping funding success rates risk permanent structural collapse of the radiology physician-scientist workforce, and jeopardizing United States leadership in imaging science, artificial intelligence, and translational innovation.</div></div><div>The United States National Institutes of Health (NIH) serves as the cornerstone of biomedical research funding. Yet, radiology departments receive a disproportionately small share of this support, concentrated among senior investigators at large academic institutions. Beginning in January 2025, the current administration proposed an approximately 40% reduction in federal research funding, equivalent to a $20 billion decrease, and implemented the termination or freezing of over 2500 grants, representing $1.4 billion in research loss, alongside a proposed 15% mandatory cap on indirect cost recovery. This perspective examines the potential consequences of these administrative changes on the radiology physician-scientist pipeline and the future of imaging research and innovation. Research Project Grant success rates are projected to decline from 18.5% in fiscal year (FY) 2024 to a historic low of 7.3% by FY 2026, compounding the already widening gap between established and early-career investigators. Radiology-specific training pathways remain critically undersubscribed, with the Holman Research Pathway averaging only 1.6 graduates per year over 20 years. The systematic erosion of NIH training grants and dropping funding success rates risk permanent structural collapse of the radiology physician-scientist workforce, and jeopardizing United States leadership in imaging science, artificial intelligence, and translational innovation.</div>","PeriodicalId":50928,"journal":{"name":"Academic Radiology","volume":"33 10","pages":"Pages 4198-4203"},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Academic Radiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1076633226005192","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/7/27 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The United States National Institutes of Health (NIH) serves as the cornerstone of biomedical research funding. Yet, radiology departments receive a disproportionately small share of this support, concentrated among senior investigators at large academic institutions. Beginning in January 2025, the current administration proposed an approximately 40% reduction in federal research funding, equivalent to a $20 billion decrease, and implemented the termination or freezing of over 2500 grants, representing $1.4 billion in research loss, alongside a proposed 15% mandatory cap on indirect cost recovery. This perspective examines the potential consequences of these administrative changes on the radiology physician-scientist pipeline and the future of imaging research and innovation. Research Project Grant success rates are projected to decline from 18.5% in fiscal year (FY) 2024 to a historic low of 7.3% by FY 2026, compounding the already widening gap between established and early-career investigators. Radiology-specific training pathways remain critically undersubscribed, with the Holman Research Pathway averaging only 1.6 graduates per year over 20 years. The systematic erosion of NIH training grants and dropping funding success rates risk permanent structural collapse of the radiology physician-scientist workforce, and jeopardizing United States leadership in imaging science, artificial intelligence, and translational innovation.
The United States National Institutes of Health (NIH) serves as the cornerstone of biomedical research funding. Yet, radiology departments receive a disproportionately small share of this support, concentrated among senior investigators at large academic institutions. Beginning in January 2025, the current administration proposed an approximately 40% reduction in federal research funding, equivalent to a $20 billion decrease, and implemented the termination or freezing of over 2500 grants, representing $1.4 billion in research loss, alongside a proposed 15% mandatory cap on indirect cost recovery. This perspective examines the potential consequences of these administrative changes on the radiology physician-scientist pipeline and the future of imaging research and innovation. Research Project Grant success rates are projected to decline from 18.5% in fiscal year (FY) 2024 to a historic low of 7.3% by FY 2026, compounding the already widening gap between established and early-career investigators. Radiology-specific training pathways remain critically undersubscribed, with the Holman Research Pathway averaging only 1.6 graduates per year over 20 years. The systematic erosion of NIH training grants and dropping funding success rates risk permanent structural collapse of the radiology physician-scientist workforce, and jeopardizing United States leadership in imaging science, artificial intelligence, and translational innovation.
2025年国家卫生预算削减研究所和放射学创新的未来:对医生-科学家管道和研究范式的影响。
美国国立卫生研究院(NIH)是生物医学研究经费的基石。然而,放射科得到的支持却少得不成比例,主要集中在大型学术机构的高级研究人员身上。从2025年1月开始,本届政府提议削减约40%的联邦研究经费,相当于减少200亿美元,并实施终止或冻结2500多项拨款,这意味着14亿美元的研究损失,同时提议对间接成本回收设定15%的强制性上限。这一观点探讨了这些行政管理变化对放射科医师-科学家管道和未来成像研究和创新的潜在影响。研究项目资助的成功率预计将从2024财年的18.5%下降到2026财年的历史最低水平7.3%,这将加剧现有研究人员与早期职业研究人员之间已经扩大的差距。放射学专门的培训途径仍然严重供不应求,20年来,霍尔曼研究途径平均每年只有1.6名毕业生。美国国立卫生研究院培训经费的系统性侵蚀和资助成功率的下降,可能会导致放射科医生和科学家队伍的永久性结构性崩溃,并危及美国在成像科学、人工智能和转化创新方面的领导地位。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Academic Radiology
Academic Radiology 医学-核医学
CiteScore
7.60
自引率
10.40%
发文量
432
审稿时长
18 days
期刊介绍: Academic Radiology publishes original reports of clinical and laboratory investigations in diagnostic imaging, the diagnostic use of radioactive isotopes, computed tomography, positron emission tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, ultrasound, digital subtraction angiography, image-guided interventions and related techniques. It also includes brief technical reports describing original observations, techniques, and instrumental developments; state-of-the-art reports on clinical issues, new technology and other topics of current medical importance; meta-analyses; scientific studies and opinions on radiologic education; and letters to the Editor.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书