The 2025 National Institute of Health Budget Cuts and the Future of Radiology Innovation: Implications for the Physician-Scientist Pipeline and Research Paradigms
IF 4.7 2区 医学Q1 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Ali Rashidi MD, Patricia Balthazar MD, MPH, Elizabeth A. Krupinski PhD, FSPIE, FSIIM, FATA, FAIMBE, FAUR
{"title":"The 2025 National Institute of Health Budget Cuts and the Future of Radiology Innovation: Implications for the Physician-Scientist Pipeline and Research Paradigms","authors":"Ali Rashidi MD, Patricia Balthazar MD, MPH, Elizabeth A. Krupinski PhD, FSPIE, FSIIM, FATA, FAIMBE, FAUR","doi":"10.1016/j.acra.2026.07.009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The United States National Institutes of Health (NIH) serves as the cornerstone of biomedical research funding. Yet, radiology departments receive a disproportionately small share of this support, concentrated among senior investigators at large academic institutions. Beginning in January 2025, the current administration proposed an approximately 40% reduction in federal research funding, equivalent to a $20 billion decrease, and implemented the termination or freezing of over 2500 grants, representing $1.4 billion in research loss, alongside a proposed 15% mandatory cap on indirect cost recovery. This perspective examines the potential consequences of these administrative changes on the radiology physician-scientist pipeline and the future of imaging research and innovation. Research Project Grant success rates are projected to decline from 18.5% in fiscal year (FY) 2024 to a historic low of 7.3% by FY 2026, compounding the already widening gap between established and early-career investigators. Radiology-specific training pathways remain critically undersubscribed, with the Holman Research Pathway averaging only 1.6 graduates per year over 20 years. The systematic erosion of NIH training grants and dropping funding success rates risk permanent structural collapse of the radiology physician-scientist workforce, and jeopardizing United States leadership in imaging science, artificial intelligence, and translational innovation.</div></div><div>The United States National Institutes of Health (NIH) serves as the cornerstone of biomedical research funding. Yet, radiology departments receive a disproportionately small share of this support, concentrated among senior investigators at large academic institutions. Beginning in January 2025, the current administration proposed an approximately 40% reduction in federal research funding, equivalent to a $20 billion decrease, and implemented the termination or freezing of over 2500 grants, representing $1.4 billion in research loss, alongside a proposed 15% mandatory cap on indirect cost recovery. This perspective examines the potential consequences of these administrative changes on the radiology physician-scientist pipeline and the future of imaging research and innovation. Research Project Grant success rates are projected to decline from 18.5% in fiscal year (FY) 2024 to a historic low of 7.3% by FY 2026, compounding the already widening gap between established and early-career investigators. Radiology-specific training pathways remain critically undersubscribed, with the Holman Research Pathway averaging only 1.6 graduates per year over 20 years. The systematic erosion of NIH training grants and dropping funding success rates risk permanent structural collapse of the radiology physician-scientist workforce, and jeopardizing United States leadership in imaging science, artificial intelligence, and translational innovation.</div>","PeriodicalId":50928,"journal":{"name":"Academic Radiology","volume":"33 10","pages":"Pages 4198-4203"},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Academic Radiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1076633226005192","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/7/27 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The United States National Institutes of Health (NIH) serves as the cornerstone of biomedical research funding. Yet, radiology departments receive a disproportionately small share of this support, concentrated among senior investigators at large academic institutions. Beginning in January 2025, the current administration proposed an approximately 40% reduction in federal research funding, equivalent to a $20 billion decrease, and implemented the termination or freezing of over 2500 grants, representing $1.4 billion in research loss, alongside a proposed 15% mandatory cap on indirect cost recovery. This perspective examines the potential consequences of these administrative changes on the radiology physician-scientist pipeline and the future of imaging research and innovation. Research Project Grant success rates are projected to decline from 18.5% in fiscal year (FY) 2024 to a historic low of 7.3% by FY 2026, compounding the already widening gap between established and early-career investigators. Radiology-specific training pathways remain critically undersubscribed, with the Holman Research Pathway averaging only 1.6 graduates per year over 20 years. The systematic erosion of NIH training grants and dropping funding success rates risk permanent structural collapse of the radiology physician-scientist workforce, and jeopardizing United States leadership in imaging science, artificial intelligence, and translational innovation.
The United States National Institutes of Health (NIH) serves as the cornerstone of biomedical research funding. Yet, radiology departments receive a disproportionately small share of this support, concentrated among senior investigators at large academic institutions. Beginning in January 2025, the current administration proposed an approximately 40% reduction in federal research funding, equivalent to a $20 billion decrease, and implemented the termination or freezing of over 2500 grants, representing $1.4 billion in research loss, alongside a proposed 15% mandatory cap on indirect cost recovery. This perspective examines the potential consequences of these administrative changes on the radiology physician-scientist pipeline and the future of imaging research and innovation. Research Project Grant success rates are projected to decline from 18.5% in fiscal year (FY) 2024 to a historic low of 7.3% by FY 2026, compounding the already widening gap between established and early-career investigators. Radiology-specific training pathways remain critically undersubscribed, with the Holman Research Pathway averaging only 1.6 graduates per year over 20 years. The systematic erosion of NIH training grants and dropping funding success rates risk permanent structural collapse of the radiology physician-scientist workforce, and jeopardizing United States leadership in imaging science, artificial intelligence, and translational innovation.
期刊介绍:
Academic Radiology publishes original reports of clinical and laboratory investigations in diagnostic imaging, the diagnostic use of radioactive isotopes, computed tomography, positron emission tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, ultrasound, digital subtraction angiography, image-guided interventions and related techniques. It also includes brief technical reports describing original observations, techniques, and instrumental developments; state-of-the-art reports on clinical issues, new technology and other topics of current medical importance; meta-analyses; scientific studies and opinions on radiologic education; and letters to the Editor.