Fluid ingress and surface wettability of 3D-printed closed-hollow obturator specimens across material types and printing orientations.

IF 3.6 2区 医学 Q1 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Wisarut Prawatvatchara, Soranun Chantarangsu, Somphote Angkanawiriyarak, Raiwint Khunwisetkul, Kwanwong Boonpitak, Visaluk Punyawattananon, Cheewin Towithelertkul
{"title":"Fluid ingress and surface wettability of 3D-printed closed-hollow obturator specimens across material types and printing orientations.","authors":"Wisarut Prawatvatchara, Soranun Chantarangsu, Somphote Angkanawiriyarak, Raiwint Khunwisetkul, Kwanwong Boonpitak, Visaluk Punyawattananon, Cheewin Towithelertkul","doi":"10.1111/jopr.70201","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To evaluate the effects of material type, printing orientation, and thermocycling on cumulative fluid ingress in three-dimensional (3D)-printed closed-hollow obturator specimens and to compare water contact angle among material-printing orientation groups.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Standardized closed-hollow obturator specimens were fabricated from NextDent Denture 3D+, Apex Base, and MED610 at 0°, 45°, and 90° (n = 10 per subgroup). After 24 h of conditioning, the specimens were weighed at baseline and after 5000 and 10,000 thermocycles. Fluid ingress was quantified as net and relative weight change from baseline. Water contact angle before thermocycling was measured using the sessile-drop method. Weight outcomes were analyzed with three-way mixed analysis of variance and contact angle with two-way analysis of variance (α = 0.05).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Both weight outcomes increased from 5000 to 10,000 thermocycles in all groups. Material, printing orientation, and thermocycling level significantly affected fluid ingress. Apex Base showed the greatest cumulative mass gain; NextDent Denture 3D+, intermediate values; and MED610, the lowest. Descriptively, values were highest at 0° and lowest at 90°. At 10,000 cycles, the highest mean net weight change occurred in Apex Base 0°, and the lowest in MED610 90°. Contact angle was significantly affected by material and orientation; NextDent Denture 3D+ showed the highest values, and MED610 the lowest.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Cumulative fluid ingress increases with thermocycling and is influenced by material type and printing orientation in 3D-printed obturators. Surface wettability differs among groups but does not directly correspond to fluid ingress behavior.</p>","PeriodicalId":49152,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Prosthodontics-Implant Esthetic and Reconstructive Dentistry","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Prosthodontics-Implant Esthetic and Reconstructive Dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jopr.70201","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate the effects of material type, printing orientation, and thermocycling on cumulative fluid ingress in three-dimensional (3D)-printed closed-hollow obturator specimens and to compare water contact angle among material-printing orientation groups.

Materials and methods: Standardized closed-hollow obturator specimens were fabricated from NextDent Denture 3D+, Apex Base, and MED610 at 0°, 45°, and 90° (n = 10 per subgroup). After 24 h of conditioning, the specimens were weighed at baseline and after 5000 and 10,000 thermocycles. Fluid ingress was quantified as net and relative weight change from baseline. Water contact angle before thermocycling was measured using the sessile-drop method. Weight outcomes were analyzed with three-way mixed analysis of variance and contact angle with two-way analysis of variance (α = 0.05).

Results: Both weight outcomes increased from 5000 to 10,000 thermocycles in all groups. Material, printing orientation, and thermocycling level significantly affected fluid ingress. Apex Base showed the greatest cumulative mass gain; NextDent Denture 3D+, intermediate values; and MED610, the lowest. Descriptively, values were highest at 0° and lowest at 90°. At 10,000 cycles, the highest mean net weight change occurred in Apex Base 0°, and the lowest in MED610 90°. Contact angle was significantly affected by material and orientation; NextDent Denture 3D+ showed the highest values, and MED610 the lowest.

Conclusion: Cumulative fluid ingress increases with thermocycling and is influenced by material type and printing orientation in 3D-printed obturators. Surface wettability differs among groups but does not directly correspond to fluid ingress behavior.

不同材料类型和打印方向的3d打印封闭中空密封试件的流体进入和表面润湿性。
目的:评价材料类型、打印方向和热循环对三维(3D)打印闭孔样品累积流体进入的影响,并比较不同材料打印方向组间的水接触角。材料和方法:采用NextDent Denture 3D+、Apex Base和MED610分别制作0°、45°和90°的标准化闭孔标本(每亚组n = 10)。24h后,分别在基线、5000和10000热循环后称重。液体摄入被量化为净体重变化和相对体重变化。采用固滴法测定了热循环前的水接触角。加权结果采用三向混合方差分析,接触角采用双向方差分析(α = 0.05)。结果:两组体重结果均从5000热循环增加到10000热循环。材料、打印方向和热循环水平显著影响流体进入。Apex基部的累积质量增加最大;NextDent Denture 3D+,中间值;MED610是最低的。描述性地,数值在0°时最高,在90°时最低。在10,000次循环中,Apex Base 0°的平均净重变化最大,MED610 90°的平均净重变化最小。接触角受材料和取向影响显著;NextDent Denture 3D+最高,MED610最低。结论:3d打印闭孔的累积入液量随热循环的增加而增加,并受材料类型和打印方向的影响。不同组之间的表面润湿性不同,但并不直接对应流体的进入行为。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.90
自引率
15.00%
发文量
171
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Prosthodontics promotes the advanced study and practice of prosthodontics, implant, esthetic, and reconstructive dentistry. It is the official journal of the American College of Prosthodontists, the American Dental Association-recognized voice of the Specialty of Prosthodontics. The journal publishes evidence-based original scientific articles presenting information that is relevant and useful to prosthodontists. Additionally, it publishes reports of innovative techniques, new instructional methodologies, and instructive clinical reports with an interdisciplinary flair. The journal is particularly focused on promoting the study and use of cutting-edge technology and positioning prosthodontists as the early-adopters of new technology in the dental community.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书