A Qualitative Study of Family Physician and Patient Perspectives on Professionalism.

IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Annie Koempel, Madeline Byrd, Tanya Lord, Robert L Phillips
{"title":"A Qualitative Study of Family Physician and Patient Perspectives on Professionalism.","authors":"Annie Koempel, Madeline Byrd, Tanya Lord, Robert L Phillips","doi":"10.3122/jabfm.2026.260058R0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Despite a robust literature on the topic, a consistent definition of medical professionalism remains elusive. A single, generalizable definition is ineffective and tends to emphasize prohibited behaviors rather than aspirational concepts. As physicians are increasingly employed by corporate entities, the nature of healthcare work has changed, as well as professional expectations. This study explores how patients and family physicians understand medical professionalism and its drivers.We recruited family physicians who completed the ABFM Continuing Certification Questionnaire in 2024 to participate in in-depth, semi-structured interviews. A trained qualitative researcher used Zoom to interview 27 demographically diverse physicians. We utilized modified snowball sampling to recruit patients through a key informant. All interviews were transcribed verbatim and analyzed utilizing NVivo software following an inductive content analysis approach.Interview results coalesced into a model of professionalism that represents the clinic visit, the practice site, and the overarching system. Three main components of individual physician professionalism emerged, including foundational duties, relationship-based care, and communication. Patient trust in the overarching healthcare system and individual physicians was deeply influenced by the interconnected system.This study presents key elements of physician professionalism while highlighting how deeply physicians are entangled within the larger practice and healthcare systems. Professionalism extends beyond-and is impacted by-more than individual attitudes and behaviors. Institutions must interrogate their own policies to support physicians in developing their skills in relationship-based care and communication.</p>","PeriodicalId":50018,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine","volume":"39 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3122/jabfm.2026.260058R0","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Despite a robust literature on the topic, a consistent definition of medical professionalism remains elusive. A single, generalizable definition is ineffective and tends to emphasize prohibited behaviors rather than aspirational concepts. As physicians are increasingly employed by corporate entities, the nature of healthcare work has changed, as well as professional expectations. This study explores how patients and family physicians understand medical professionalism and its drivers.We recruited family physicians who completed the ABFM Continuing Certification Questionnaire in 2024 to participate in in-depth, semi-structured interviews. A trained qualitative researcher used Zoom to interview 27 demographically diverse physicians. We utilized modified snowball sampling to recruit patients through a key informant. All interviews were transcribed verbatim and analyzed utilizing NVivo software following an inductive content analysis approach.Interview results coalesced into a model of professionalism that represents the clinic visit, the practice site, and the overarching system. Three main components of individual physician professionalism emerged, including foundational duties, relationship-based care, and communication. Patient trust in the overarching healthcare system and individual physicians was deeply influenced by the interconnected system.This study presents key elements of physician professionalism while highlighting how deeply physicians are entangled within the larger practice and healthcare systems. Professionalism extends beyond-and is impacted by-more than individual attitudes and behaviors. Institutions must interrogate their own policies to support physicians in developing their skills in relationship-based care and communication.

家庭医生与患者专业态度的质性研究。
尽管在这个话题上有大量的文献,但对医学专业精神的一致定义仍然难以捉摸。单一的、一般化的定义是无效的,而且往往强调被禁止的行为,而不是有抱负的概念。随着越来越多的医生受雇于企业实体,医疗保健工作的性质发生了变化,职业期望也发生了变化。本研究探讨患者和家庭医生如何理解医疗专业精神及其驱动因素。我们招募了2024年完成ABFM持续认证问卷的家庭医生参与深度、半结构化访谈。一位训练有素的定性研究人员使用Zoom采访了27名人口统计学上不同的医生。我们采用改进的雪球抽样方法,通过一个关键的线人来招募患者。所有访谈均逐字记录,并采用归纳内容分析方法,利用NVivo软件进行分析。访谈结果合并成一个代表诊所访问、实践地点和总体系统的专业模式。个体医生专业精神的三个主要组成部分出现了,包括基本职责、基于关系的护理和沟通。患者对总体医疗保健系统和个体医生的信任深受互联系统的影响。本研究提出了医生专业精神的关键要素,同时强调了医生在更大的实践和医疗保健系统中纠缠的程度。专业精神不仅仅是个人的态度和行为,而且还受其影响。机构必须审视自己的政策,以支持医生发展他们在基于关系的护理和沟通方面的技能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
6.90%
发文量
168
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Published since 1988, the Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine ( JABFM ) is the official peer-reviewed journal of the American Board of Family Medicine (ABFM). Believing that the public and scientific communities are best served by open access to information, JABFM makes its articles available free of charge and without registration at www.jabfm.org. JABFM is indexed by Medline, Index Medicus, and other services.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书