Providing "ADEPT-CARE" to patients with disabilities: Implementing a health system-wide workforce education module.

IF 3 2区 医学 Q1 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Lydia Smeltz, Caanen Churukha, Erik Lehman, Tonya King, Nora Newcomb, Ami DeWaters
{"title":"Providing \"ADEPT-CARE\" to patients with disabilities: Implementing a health system-wide workforce education module.","authors":"Lydia Smeltz, Caanen Churukha, Erik Lehman, Tonya King, Nora Newcomb, Ami DeWaters","doi":"10.1016/j.dhjo.2026.102132","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Disability-specific workforce education modules (WEM) are lacking in healthcare. ADEPT-CARE, a tool for approaching clinical encounters with patients with disabilities, has been an efficacious module for health professions students.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>ADEPT-CARE was adapted into a WEM with the overall goal of assessing the generalizability of pilot findings among health professions students to healthcare professionals and patient-facing employees. The specific aims of this study were to (1) explore health system staff's willingness to participate in the ADEPT-CARE WEM; (2) evaluate the efficacy of ADEPT-CARE among participants; and (3) assess self-reported changes in confidence and attitudes towards patients with disabilities by key participant demographics.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>All healthcare professionals and patient-facing employees at an academic medical center were invited to voluntarily participate in the WEM. Demographic data from matched pre/post-survey responses were summarized. Pre/post comparisons were analyzed using a generalized estimating equations model approach to binomial logistic regression and odds ratios.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>13,164 of 14,410 eligible employees participated in the WEM (91% completion rate). 1542 participants completed both the pre- and post-surveys. After completion, participants reported increased confidence in their ability to assess a disabled patient (OR = 12.84 (9.04, 18.24), p < 0.001) and provide the same quality of care to patients with and without disabilities (OR = 5.99 (4.40, 8.14), p < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>ADEPT-CARE improved participants' self-reported confidence and attitudes towards patients with disabilities. Building upon prior work, these findings support ADEPT-CARE's potential value as a scalable intervention and its generalizability to a broad healthcare workforce.</p>","PeriodicalId":49300,"journal":{"name":"Disability and Health Journal","volume":" ","pages":"102132"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Disability and Health Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dhjo.2026.102132","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Disability-specific workforce education modules (WEM) are lacking in healthcare. ADEPT-CARE, a tool for approaching clinical encounters with patients with disabilities, has been an efficacious module for health professions students.

Objectives: ADEPT-CARE was adapted into a WEM with the overall goal of assessing the generalizability of pilot findings among health professions students to healthcare professionals and patient-facing employees. The specific aims of this study were to (1) explore health system staff's willingness to participate in the ADEPT-CARE WEM; (2) evaluate the efficacy of ADEPT-CARE among participants; and (3) assess self-reported changes in confidence and attitudes towards patients with disabilities by key participant demographics.

Methods: All healthcare professionals and patient-facing employees at an academic medical center were invited to voluntarily participate in the WEM. Demographic data from matched pre/post-survey responses were summarized. Pre/post comparisons were analyzed using a generalized estimating equations model approach to binomial logistic regression and odds ratios.

Results: 13,164 of 14,410 eligible employees participated in the WEM (91% completion rate). 1542 participants completed both the pre- and post-surveys. After completion, participants reported increased confidence in their ability to assess a disabled patient (OR = 12.84 (9.04, 18.24), p < 0.001) and provide the same quality of care to patients with and without disabilities (OR = 5.99 (4.40, 8.14), p < 0.001).

Conclusions: ADEPT-CARE improved participants' self-reported confidence and attitudes towards patients with disabilities. Building upon prior work, these findings support ADEPT-CARE's potential value as a scalable intervention and its generalizability to a broad healthcare workforce.

为残疾患者提供“熟练护理”:实施卫生系统范围内的劳动力教育模块。
背景:医疗保健缺乏残疾人劳动力教育模块(WEM)。ADEPT-CARE是一个与残疾患者进行临床接触的工具,对卫生专业的学生来说是一个有效的模块。目标:ADEPT-CARE被改编为WEM,其总体目标是评估卫生专业学生对卫生专业人员和面向患者的员工的试点结果的普遍性。本研究的具体目的是:(1)探讨卫生系统工作人员参与ADEPT-CARE WEM的意愿;(2)评价受试者对ADEPT-CARE的疗效;(3)通过关键参与者人口统计数据评估自我报告的对残疾患者信心和态度的变化。方法:邀请某学术医疗中心的所有医护专业人员和面向患者的员工自愿参加WEM。从匹配的调查前/调查后的答复中总结了人口统计数据。使用二项逻辑回归和优势比的广义估计方程模型方法分析前后比较。结果:14,410名符合条件的员工中有13,164人参加了WEM,完成率为91%。1542名参与者完成了前后调查。完成后,参与者报告对自己评估残疾患者能力的信心增加(OR = 12.84 (9.04,18.24),p )结论:ADEPT-CARE改善了参与者自我报告的对残疾患者的信心和态度。在先前工作的基础上,这些发现支持ADEPT-CARE作为一种可扩展的干预措施的潜在价值,以及它在广泛的医疗保健队伍中的推广价值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Disability and Health Journal
Disability and Health Journal HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES-PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
6.70%
发文量
134
审稿时长
34 days
期刊介绍: Disability and Health Journal is a scientific, scholarly, and multidisciplinary journal for reporting original contributions that advance knowledge in disability and health. Topics may be related to global health, quality of life, and specific health conditions as they relate to disability. Such contributions include: • Reports of empirical research on the characteristics of persons with disabilities, environment, health outcomes, and determinants of health • Reports of empirical research on the Systematic or other evidence-based reviews and tightly conceived theoretical interpretations of research literature • Reports of empirical research on the Evaluative research on new interventions, technologies, and programs • Reports of empirical research on the Reports on issues or policies affecting the health and/or quality of life for persons with disabilities, using a scientific base.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书