Lydia Smeltz, Caanen Churukha, Erik Lehman, Tonya King, Nora Newcomb, Ami DeWaters
{"title":"Providing \"ADEPT-CARE\" to patients with disabilities: Implementing a health system-wide workforce education module.","authors":"Lydia Smeltz, Caanen Churukha, Erik Lehman, Tonya King, Nora Newcomb, Ami DeWaters","doi":"10.1016/j.dhjo.2026.102132","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Disability-specific workforce education modules (WEM) are lacking in healthcare. ADEPT-CARE, a tool for approaching clinical encounters with patients with disabilities, has been an efficacious module for health professions students.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>ADEPT-CARE was adapted into a WEM with the overall goal of assessing the generalizability of pilot findings among health professions students to healthcare professionals and patient-facing employees. The specific aims of this study were to (1) explore health system staff's willingness to participate in the ADEPT-CARE WEM; (2) evaluate the efficacy of ADEPT-CARE among participants; and (3) assess self-reported changes in confidence and attitudes towards patients with disabilities by key participant demographics.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>All healthcare professionals and patient-facing employees at an academic medical center were invited to voluntarily participate in the WEM. Demographic data from matched pre/post-survey responses were summarized. Pre/post comparisons were analyzed using a generalized estimating equations model approach to binomial logistic regression and odds ratios.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>13,164 of 14,410 eligible employees participated in the WEM (91% completion rate). 1542 participants completed both the pre- and post-surveys. After completion, participants reported increased confidence in their ability to assess a disabled patient (OR = 12.84 (9.04, 18.24), p < 0.001) and provide the same quality of care to patients with and without disabilities (OR = 5.99 (4.40, 8.14), p < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>ADEPT-CARE improved participants' self-reported confidence and attitudes towards patients with disabilities. Building upon prior work, these findings support ADEPT-CARE's potential value as a scalable intervention and its generalizability to a broad healthcare workforce.</p>","PeriodicalId":49300,"journal":{"name":"Disability and Health Journal","volume":" ","pages":"102132"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Disability and Health Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dhjo.2026.102132","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Disability-specific workforce education modules (WEM) are lacking in healthcare. ADEPT-CARE, a tool for approaching clinical encounters with patients with disabilities, has been an efficacious module for health professions students.
Objectives: ADEPT-CARE was adapted into a WEM with the overall goal of assessing the generalizability of pilot findings among health professions students to healthcare professionals and patient-facing employees. The specific aims of this study were to (1) explore health system staff's willingness to participate in the ADEPT-CARE WEM; (2) evaluate the efficacy of ADEPT-CARE among participants; and (3) assess self-reported changes in confidence and attitudes towards patients with disabilities by key participant demographics.
Methods: All healthcare professionals and patient-facing employees at an academic medical center were invited to voluntarily participate in the WEM. Demographic data from matched pre/post-survey responses were summarized. Pre/post comparisons were analyzed using a generalized estimating equations model approach to binomial logistic regression and odds ratios.
Results: 13,164 of 14,410 eligible employees participated in the WEM (91% completion rate). 1542 participants completed both the pre- and post-surveys. After completion, participants reported increased confidence in their ability to assess a disabled patient (OR = 12.84 (9.04, 18.24), p < 0.001) and provide the same quality of care to patients with and without disabilities (OR = 5.99 (4.40, 8.14), p < 0.001).
Conclusions: ADEPT-CARE improved participants' self-reported confidence and attitudes towards patients with disabilities. Building upon prior work, these findings support ADEPT-CARE's potential value as a scalable intervention and its generalizability to a broad healthcare workforce.
期刊介绍:
Disability and Health Journal is a scientific, scholarly, and multidisciplinary journal for reporting original contributions that advance knowledge in disability and health. Topics may be related to global health, quality of life, and specific health conditions as they relate to disability. Such contributions include:
• Reports of empirical research on the characteristics of persons with disabilities, environment, health outcomes, and determinants of health
• Reports of empirical research on the Systematic or other evidence-based reviews and tightly conceived theoretical interpretations of research literature
• Reports of empirical research on the Evaluative research on new interventions, technologies, and programs
• Reports of empirical research on the Reports on issues or policies affecting the health and/or quality of life for persons with disabilities, using a scientific base.