An explainable machine learning approach for cervical cancer screening: decoding morphological diagnostic drivers.

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Huan Chang, Xiaoxu Liu, Lixin Qin, Yafan Wang, Limei Mao, Donghua Wang, Jianwei Zhang, Xiaoqing Pang
{"title":"An explainable machine learning approach for cervical cancer screening: decoding morphological diagnostic drivers.","authors":"Huan Chang, Xiaoxu Liu, Lixin Qin, Yafan Wang, Limei Mao, Donghua Wang, Jianwei Zhang, Xiaoqing Pang","doi":"10.1080/17843286.2026.2711062","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Cervical cancer screening in primary care is hindered by expert pathologist shortages and heavy diagnostic workloads, leading to fatigue-induced misdiagnoses. This study evaluated the diagnostic capacity, subpopulation robustness, and operational efficiency of an interpretable machine learning (ML) tool within a large Chinese healthcare network.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective database of 5,000 women was audited. Archived liquid-based cytology (LBC) digital slides were evaluated via a parallel validation channel: the LBC-NET pipeline versus a double-blind panel of senior cytopathologists. Diagnostic safety was tested by stratifying data across age, vaginal infections, and menopause conditions. Algorithmic transparency was quantified using game-theoretic Shapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) and morphological feature tracking. Operational efficiency was evaluated via continuous cumulative distribution curves.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>For detecting high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions or worse (HSIL+), the ML model achieved a clinical sensitivity of 92.5%, significantly outperforming the manual method at 84.2% (<i>p</i> < 0.001), with an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.94. Subgroup stratification demonstrated that menopausal tissue atrophy or active vaginal infections caused no significant performance degradation (<i>p</i> > 0.05). SHAP analytics revealed that the nucleus-to-cytoplasmic ratio and nuclear hyperchromasia intensity were the core predictive metrics. Operationally, the ML system compressed the median slide-review time by 63.0%, escalating the daily screening capacity by 175% and reducing specialist referral consultations by 45.2%.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The interpretable ML tool provides a reliable and fast clinical choice for massive cervical cancer screening.</p>","PeriodicalId":48865,"journal":{"name":"Acta Clinica Belgica","volume":" ","pages":"1-13"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Clinica Belgica","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17843286.2026.2711062","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Cervical cancer screening in primary care is hindered by expert pathologist shortages and heavy diagnostic workloads, leading to fatigue-induced misdiagnoses. This study evaluated the diagnostic capacity, subpopulation robustness, and operational efficiency of an interpretable machine learning (ML) tool within a large Chinese healthcare network.

Methods: A retrospective database of 5,000 women was audited. Archived liquid-based cytology (LBC) digital slides were evaluated via a parallel validation channel: the LBC-NET pipeline versus a double-blind panel of senior cytopathologists. Diagnostic safety was tested by stratifying data across age, vaginal infections, and menopause conditions. Algorithmic transparency was quantified using game-theoretic Shapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) and morphological feature tracking. Operational efficiency was evaluated via continuous cumulative distribution curves.

Results: For detecting high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions or worse (HSIL+), the ML model achieved a clinical sensitivity of 92.5%, significantly outperforming the manual method at 84.2% (p < 0.001), with an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.94. Subgroup stratification demonstrated that menopausal tissue atrophy or active vaginal infections caused no significant performance degradation (p > 0.05). SHAP analytics revealed that the nucleus-to-cytoplasmic ratio and nuclear hyperchromasia intensity were the core predictive metrics. Operationally, the ML system compressed the median slide-review time by 63.0%, escalating the daily screening capacity by 175% and reducing specialist referral consultations by 45.2%.

Conclusion: The interpretable ML tool provides a reliable and fast clinical choice for massive cervical cancer screening.

一种可解释的宫颈癌筛查机器学习方法:解码形态学诊断驱动程序。
背景:初级保健中的宫颈癌筛查受到专家病理学家短缺和繁重的诊断工作量的阻碍,导致疲劳引起的误诊。本研究评估了中国大型医疗网络中可解释机器学习(ML)工具的诊断能力、亚群稳健性和运行效率。方法:对5000名妇女的回顾性数据库进行审计。通过平行验证通道对存档的液体细胞学(LBC)数字切片进行评估:LBC- net管道与高级细胞病理学家的双盲小组。通过年龄、阴道感染和更年期状况的分层数据来检验诊断安全性。采用博弈论的Shapley加性解释(SHAP)和形态特征跟踪对算法透明度进行量化。通过连续累积分布曲线评价作业效率。结果:ML模型检测高级别及以上鳞状上皮内病变(HSIL+)的临床敏感性为92.5%,显著优于手工方法的84.2% (p p > 0.05)。SHAP分析显示,核与细胞质比和核深染强度是核心预测指标。在操作上,ML系统将幻灯片审查的中位数时间缩短了63.0%,将每日筛查能力提高了175%,将专家转诊咨询减少了45.2%。结论:可解释的ML工具为大规模宫颈癌筛查提供了可靠、快速的临床选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Acta Clinica Belgica
Acta Clinica Belgica MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
44
期刊介绍: Acta Clinica Belgica: International Journal of Clinical and Laboratory Medicine primarily publishes papers on clinical medicine, clinical chemistry, pathology and molecular biology, provided they describe results which contribute to our understanding of clinical problems or describe new methods applicable to clinical investigation. Readership includes physicians, pathologists, pharmacists and physicians working in non-academic and academic hospitals, practicing internal medicine and its subspecialties.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书