Efficacy of Sensory Stimulation in Intensive Care Unit Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

IF 1.7 Q3 NURSING
Dimensions of Critical Care Nursing Pub Date : 2026-09-01 Epub Date: 2026-07-28 DOI:10.1097/DCC.0000000000000776
Chunyan Han, Xiujie Sun, Yanan Zhu, Chenchen Jing, Shujuan Wang, Huihui Xu
{"title":"Efficacy of Sensory Stimulation in Intensive Care Unit Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.","authors":"Chunyan Han, Xiujie Sun, Yanan Zhu, Chenchen Jing, Shujuan Wang, Huihui Xu","doi":"10.1097/DCC.0000000000000776","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study aimed to evaluate the effects of sensory stimulation (SS) on the level of consciousness, the incidence and duration of ICU delirium, the awakening time, and the length of mechanical ventilation in ICU patients.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were identified through a comprehensive search across 7 digital databases. Two reviewers independently screened studies, extracted data, and assessed methodological quality using the Cochrane Risk-of-Bias Tool for Randomized Trials. In case of disagreement, a third author decided whether to include or exclude the article. Meta-analyses were conducted using RevMan V.5.3.5 software.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 22 RCTs involving 1,522 patients were included. Compared with routine care, SS improved the level of consciousness (MD: 2.09; 95% CI: 1.50 to 2.68; P < .001) and reduce the incidence (OR: 0.33; 95% CI: 0.18 to 0.62; P < .001) and duration of delirium (MD: -2.63; 95% CI: -3.32 to -2.03; P < .001) in ICU patients, shorten the Awakening time (MD: -7.39; 95% CI: -8.76 to -6.01; P < .001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>SS may improve the level of consciousness, reduce the incidence of delirium, and shorten the Awakening time in ICU patients. For improvement in the level of consciousness, subgroup analyses suggest that SS delivered by family members is more effective than that delivered by nurses, multisensory stimulation (MSS) is more effective than single-modality stimulation, and an intervention period of at least 7 days is required to achieve a significant effect, with twice-daily SS appearing to be the optimal frequency.</p>","PeriodicalId":46646,"journal":{"name":"Dimensions of Critical Care Nursing","volume":"45 5","pages":"226-241"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Dimensions of Critical Care Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/DCC.0000000000000776","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/7/28 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: This study aimed to evaluate the effects of sensory stimulation (SS) on the level of consciousness, the incidence and duration of ICU delirium, the awakening time, and the length of mechanical ventilation in ICU patients.

Materials and methods: Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were identified through a comprehensive search across 7 digital databases. Two reviewers independently screened studies, extracted data, and assessed methodological quality using the Cochrane Risk-of-Bias Tool for Randomized Trials. In case of disagreement, a third author decided whether to include or exclude the article. Meta-analyses were conducted using RevMan V.5.3.5 software.

Results: A total of 22 RCTs involving 1,522 patients were included. Compared with routine care, SS improved the level of consciousness (MD: 2.09; 95% CI: 1.50 to 2.68; P < .001) and reduce the incidence (OR: 0.33; 95% CI: 0.18 to 0.62; P < .001) and duration of delirium (MD: -2.63; 95% CI: -3.32 to -2.03; P < .001) in ICU patients, shorten the Awakening time (MD: -7.39; 95% CI: -8.76 to -6.01; P < .001).

Conclusion: SS may improve the level of consciousness, reduce the incidence of delirium, and shorten the Awakening time in ICU patients. For improvement in the level of consciousness, subgroup analyses suggest that SS delivered by family members is more effective than that delivered by nurses, multisensory stimulation (MSS) is more effective than single-modality stimulation, and an intervention period of at least 7 days is required to achieve a significant effect, with twice-daily SS appearing to be the optimal frequency.

感觉刺激在重症监护病房患者中的疗效:系统回顾和meta分析。
目的:探讨感觉刺激(SS)对ICU患者意识水平、谵妄发生率及持续时间、苏醒时间及机械通气时间的影响。材料和方法:通过对7个数字数据库的全面检索确定随机对照试验(rct)。两位审稿人独立筛选研究,提取数据,并使用Cochrane随机试验风险偏倚工具评估方法学质量。如果不同意,第三作者决定是否包括或排除该文章。采用RevMan V.5.3.5软件进行meta分析。结果:共纳入22项随机对照试验,共1522例患者。与常规护理相比,SS提高了ICU患者的意识水平(MD: 2.09; 95% CI: 1.50 ~ 2.68; P < 0.001),降低了谵妄发生率(OR: 0.33; 95% CI: 0.18 ~ 0.62; P < 0.001)和谵妄持续时间(MD: -2.63; 95% CI: -3.32 ~ -2.03; P < 0.001),缩短了清醒时间(MD: -7.39; 95% CI: -8.76 ~ -6.01; P < 0.001)。结论:SS可提高ICU患者的意识水平,减少谵妄的发生,缩短苏醒时间。对于意识水平的改善,亚组分析表明,家庭成员提供的刺激比护士提供的更有效,多感觉刺激(MSS)比单模式刺激更有效,干预期至少需要7天才能达到显著效果,每天两次的刺激频率似乎是最佳的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
5.90%
发文量
102
期刊介绍: The primary purpose of Dimensions of Critical Care Nursing™ is to provide nurses with accurate, current, and relevant information and services to excel in critical care practice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书