Würdebewahren im Gesundheitswesen – Konzeption und Pilotierung einer Inhouse-Schulung für Fachpersonen im Gesundheitswesen

IF 1.5 Q4 HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES
Andrea Züger, Sandra Stephanie Mai, Jan Gramm, Jochen Spang, Swantje Goebel
{"title":"Würdebewahren im Gesundheitswesen – Konzeption und Pilotierung einer Inhouse-Schulung für Fachpersonen im Gesundheitswesen","authors":"Andrea Züger,&nbsp;Sandra Stephanie Mai,&nbsp;Jan Gramm,&nbsp;Jochen Spang,&nbsp;Swantje Goebel","doi":"10.1016/j.zefq.2026.05.013","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Healthcare professionals often experience tensions between their professional ideals and the realities of their working conditions, which can lead to frustration, exhaustion, and demoralization. The concept “ABCD of Dignity in Care” (Chochinov, 2007) – comprising the four core competencies <em>Attitude</em>, <em>Behaviour</em>, <em>Compassion</em>, and <em>Dialogue</em> – offers a practical approach to providing dignified care even under challenging circumstances.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Based on this concept, the in-house training “Dignity in Care” was developed. The program consists of three key modules: (1) dignity in society and healthcare, (2) the “ABCD of Dignity in Care,” and (3) context analysis and transfer to one’s own institution. The training was piloted in two healthcare institutions and evaluated using written pre- and post-surveys, a questionnaire, and participant observation.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>A total of 25 healthcare professionals from various disciplines took part. Overall, the evaluation (return N = 23, 92%) delivered positive results. Both the interdisciplinary exchange and the resource-oriented approach were particularly appreciated. At the content level, participants frequently expressed the desire for a deeper focus on the topic of self-care.</div></div><div><h3>Discussion</h3><div>The findings highlight the relevance of the topic “dignity in care” for healthcare professionals and show how an interprofessional course format can foster mutual appreciation. Adapting this approach to other areas, such as nursing education or medical studies, is desirable, especially as the revised Medical Licensing Regulations explicitly call for multiprofessional exchange.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>The training empowers healthcare professionals and makes dignity tangible and teachable—as both a value and a concrete call to action. The concept is currently being revised to give more emphasis to the topic of self-care. The course will be renamed “Dignity - Understanding, Protecting, Strengthening” and published as a course manual in 2027.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":46628,"journal":{"name":"Zeitschrift fur Evidenz Fortbildung und Qualitaet im Gesundheitswesen","volume":"205 ","pages":"Pages 70-79"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Zeitschrift fur Evidenz Fortbildung und Qualitaet im Gesundheitswesen","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1865921726001431","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/7/27 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Healthcare professionals often experience tensions between their professional ideals and the realities of their working conditions, which can lead to frustration, exhaustion, and demoralization. The concept “ABCD of Dignity in Care” (Chochinov, 2007) – comprising the four core competencies Attitude, Behaviour, Compassion, and Dialogue – offers a practical approach to providing dignified care even under challenging circumstances.

Methods

Based on this concept, the in-house training “Dignity in Care” was developed. The program consists of three key modules: (1) dignity in society and healthcare, (2) the “ABCD of Dignity in Care,” and (3) context analysis and transfer to one’s own institution. The training was piloted in two healthcare institutions and evaluated using written pre- and post-surveys, a questionnaire, and participant observation.

Results

A total of 25 healthcare professionals from various disciplines took part. Overall, the evaluation (return N = 23, 92%) delivered positive results. Both the interdisciplinary exchange and the resource-oriented approach were particularly appreciated. At the content level, participants frequently expressed the desire for a deeper focus on the topic of self-care.

Discussion

The findings highlight the relevance of the topic “dignity in care” for healthcare professionals and show how an interprofessional course format can foster mutual appreciation. Adapting this approach to other areas, such as nursing education or medical studies, is desirable, especially as the revised Medical Licensing Regulations explicitly call for multiprofessional exchange.

Conclusion

The training empowers healthcare professionals and makes dignity tangible and teachable—as both a value and a concrete call to action. The concept is currently being revised to give more emphasis to the topic of self-care. The course will be renamed “Dignity - Understanding, Protecting, Strengthening” and published as a course manual in 2027.
[护理中的尊严——为卫生保健专业人员设计和试行内部培训]。
背景:医疗保健专业人员经常经历他们的职业理想和他们的工作条件的现实之间的紧张关系,这可能导致沮丧,疲惫和士气低落。“护理中尊严的ABCD”概念(Chochinov, 2007) -包括四个核心能力态度,行为,同情和对话-提供了一种实用的方法,即使在具有挑战性的环境下也能提供有尊严的护理。方法:基于这一理念,开展“尊严关怀”内部培训。该计划包括三个关键模块:(1)社会和医疗保健中的尊严,(2)“护理中尊严的ABCD”,(3)背景分析和转移到自己的机构。培训在两家卫生保健机构进行了试点,并通过书面前后调查、问卷调查和参与者观察进行了评估。结果:共有25名来自不同学科的卫生专业人员参加了调查。总体而言,评估(返回N = 23,92%)提供了积极的结果。特别赞赏跨学科交流和面向资源的办法。在内容层面,参与者经常表示希望更深入地关注自我保健的话题。讨论:研究结果强调了“护理中的尊严”这一主题与医疗保健专业人员的相关性,并展示了跨专业课程形式如何促进相互欣赏。将这种方法适用于护理教育或医学研究等其他领域是可取的,特别是修订后的《医疗许可条例》明确要求进行多专业交流。结论:培训增强了卫生保健专业人员的能力,使尊严成为一种价值和一种具体的行动呼吁。这个概念目前正在修订,以更加强调自我照顾的主题。该课程将更名为“尊严-理解,保护,加强”,并于2027年以课程手册的形式出版。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
18.20%
发文量
129
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书