Barrieren und Förderfaktoren der Implementierung einer komplexen Intervention im Pflegeheim: Eine vertiefende Einzelfallanalyse

IF 1.5 Q4 HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES
Regina Thalhammer, Gabriele Meyer, Stefanie Skudlik, Martin Müller
{"title":"Barrieren und Förderfaktoren der Implementierung einer komplexen Intervention im Pflegeheim: Eine vertiefende Einzelfallanalyse","authors":"Regina Thalhammer,&nbsp;Gabriele Meyer,&nbsp;Stefanie Skudlik,&nbsp;Martin Müller","doi":"10.1016/j.zefq.2026.06.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>The complex intervention PECAN (Participation Enabling CAre in Nursing) was developed to promote activities and participation among nursing home residents with joint contractures at organisational and resident levels. It was implemented by trained facilitators and nursing staff. In a cluster RCT, PECAN showed no effect on the primary endpoint. The cluster-wide process evaluation identified leadership behaviour and differences in the degree of implementation as possible influencing factors. This case study examines a nursing home with protocol-compliant implementation but no observed effectiveness to analyse possible causes.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A qualitative secondary data analysis was conducted as an in-depth case study based on a focus group with nursing home staff (n = 5) and an individual interview with a facilitator. Data were analysed using structured qualitative content analysis according to Kuckartz along the dimensions of context, setting, and implementation. In addition, documentation forms from ten consultation sessions related to the implementation component ‘consultation of facilitators by the research team’ were analysed using a deductive-descriptive approach.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>This analysis identified additional influencing factors that were not apparent in the cluster-wide process evaluation, including socio-cultural expectations, spatial conditions, nursing staff workload, and organisational upheavals, particularly changes in leadership. These factors seem to play a relevant role in the limited changes observed in nursing care practice.</div></div><div><h3>Discussion</h3><div>Organisational upheavals led to discontinuities and hindered implementation. It remains unclear what intervention dose is required to achieve measurable effects.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Early and systematic consideration of organisational conditions appears to be crucial for implementing complex interventions at the resident level. Furthermore, the effective intervention dose has yet to be determined.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":46628,"journal":{"name":"Zeitschrift fur Evidenz Fortbildung und Qualitaet im Gesundheitswesen","volume":"205 ","pages":"Pages 94-103"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Zeitschrift fur Evidenz Fortbildung und Qualitaet im Gesundheitswesen","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1865921726001509","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/7/27 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

The complex intervention PECAN (Participation Enabling CAre in Nursing) was developed to promote activities and participation among nursing home residents with joint contractures at organisational and resident levels. It was implemented by trained facilitators and nursing staff. In a cluster RCT, PECAN showed no effect on the primary endpoint. The cluster-wide process evaluation identified leadership behaviour and differences in the degree of implementation as possible influencing factors. This case study examines a nursing home with protocol-compliant implementation but no observed effectiveness to analyse possible causes.

Methods

A qualitative secondary data analysis was conducted as an in-depth case study based on a focus group with nursing home staff (n = 5) and an individual interview with a facilitator. Data were analysed using structured qualitative content analysis according to Kuckartz along the dimensions of context, setting, and implementation. In addition, documentation forms from ten consultation sessions related to the implementation component ‘consultation of facilitators by the research team’ were analysed using a deductive-descriptive approach.

Results

This analysis identified additional influencing factors that were not apparent in the cluster-wide process evaluation, including socio-cultural expectations, spatial conditions, nursing staff workload, and organisational upheavals, particularly changes in leadership. These factors seem to play a relevant role in the limited changes observed in nursing care practice.

Discussion

Organisational upheavals led to discontinuities and hindered implementation. It remains unclear what intervention dose is required to achieve measurable effects.

Conclusion

Early and systematic consideration of organisational conditions appears to be crucial for implementing complex interventions at the resident level. Furthermore, the effective intervention dose has yet to be determined.
[在养老院实施复杂干预的障碍和促进因素:一个深入的案例研究]。
简介:复杂干预PECAN(参与使护理护理)的发展,以促进活动和参与养老院的居民在组织和居民层面的联合挛缩。它由训练有素的辅导员和护理人员实施。在集群RCT中,PECAN对主要终点没有影响。集群范围的过程评价确定了领导行为和执行程度的差异可能是影响因素。本案例研究考察了一家符合协议的养老院,但没有观察到有效性,以分析可能的原因。方法:对养老院工作人员(n = 5)进行焦点小组调查,并对主持人进行单独访谈,对定性辅助数据进行深入案例研究。数据分析采用结构化定性内容分析,根据库卡兹沿着上下文,设置和实施的维度。此外,使用演绎-描述方法分析了与执行部分“研究小组与调解员协商”有关的十次协商会议的文件格式。结果:该分析确定了在集群范围内的过程评估中不明显的其他影响因素,包括社会文化期望、空间条件、护理人员工作量和组织动荡,特别是领导层的变化。这些因素似乎在护理实践中观察到的有限变化中发挥了相关作用。讨论:组织动荡导致不连续性和阻碍实施。目前尚不清楚需要多大的干预剂量才能达到可测量的效果。结论:早期和系统地考虑组织条件似乎是在居民层面实施复杂干预措施的关键。此外,有效的干预剂量还有待确定。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
18.20%
发文量
129
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书