The economic impact of medical scribe provision on physician productivity in outpatient clinics: a scoping review.

IF 3.1 4区 医学 Q3 HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES
Ashwag Al Dhuhaibat, Thomas Mason, Erik Koornneef
{"title":"The economic impact of medical scribe provision on physician productivity in outpatient clinics: a scoping review.","authors":"Ashwag Al Dhuhaibat, Thomas Mason, Erik Koornneef","doi":"10.1186/s12962-026-00764-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Medical scribes are increasingly used in outpatient clinics in the United States to reduce physician documentation burden, but their economic and operational impact remains inconsistently characterized. This scoping review synthesized evidence on the impact of medical scribes in outpatient care in the United States, focusing on physician productivity, documentation efficiency, and financial outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Nine databases were searched from January 2010 to September 2024 for English-language studies reporting economic or productivity outcomes of medical scribe use in outpatient settings. Two reviewers independently screened 1,945 unique records; data were charted using a piloted template and synthesized thematically.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty United States-based studies met the inclusion criteria: nine pre-post evaluations, five controlled cohort studies, two randomized controlled trials (RCTs), two microsimulation models, and two systematic reviews. Scribes consistently improved physician productivity: 19 of 20 studies (95%) reported increased work relative value units (wRVUs), higher patient throughput, and reduced documentation time. Clinician satisfaction improved across 9 studies; patient experience remained stable. Economic outcomes varied: 13 of 20 studies attempted return on investment (ROI) analysis, but only 6 included comprehensive costs (wages, training, licensing, turnover). Cost neutrality was achievable in high-volume clinics with predictable scheduling and unutilized capacity, but financial returns depended heavily on specialty, baseline productivity, and cost accounting rigor.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Medical scribes enhance operational efficiency and physician workflow in United States outpatient clinics, though economic value is context-dependent and incompletely documented. Standardised cost frameworks and controlled evaluations in non-United States health systems are needed to guide implementation decisions.</p>","PeriodicalId":47054,"journal":{"name":"Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation","volume":"24 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13419020/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12962-026-00764-7","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Medical scribes are increasingly used in outpatient clinics in the United States to reduce physician documentation burden, but their economic and operational impact remains inconsistently characterized. This scoping review synthesized evidence on the impact of medical scribes in outpatient care in the United States, focusing on physician productivity, documentation efficiency, and financial outcomes.

Methods: Nine databases were searched from January 2010 to September 2024 for English-language studies reporting economic or productivity outcomes of medical scribe use in outpatient settings. Two reviewers independently screened 1,945 unique records; data were charted using a piloted template and synthesized thematically.

Results: Twenty United States-based studies met the inclusion criteria: nine pre-post evaluations, five controlled cohort studies, two randomized controlled trials (RCTs), two microsimulation models, and two systematic reviews. Scribes consistently improved physician productivity: 19 of 20 studies (95%) reported increased work relative value units (wRVUs), higher patient throughput, and reduced documentation time. Clinician satisfaction improved across 9 studies; patient experience remained stable. Economic outcomes varied: 13 of 20 studies attempted return on investment (ROI) analysis, but only 6 included comprehensive costs (wages, training, licensing, turnover). Cost neutrality was achievable in high-volume clinics with predictable scheduling and unutilized capacity, but financial returns depended heavily on specialty, baseline productivity, and cost accounting rigor.

Conclusions: Medical scribes enhance operational efficiency and physician workflow in United States outpatient clinics, though economic value is context-dependent and incompletely documented. Standardised cost frameworks and controlled evaluations in non-United States health systems are needed to guide implementation decisions.

医疗抄写员提供对门诊医生生产力的经济影响:范围审查。
背景:医疗抄写员越来越多地在美国门诊诊所使用,以减轻医生的文件负担,但其经济和业务影响仍然不一致。本综述综合了美国门诊医疗记录员影响的证据,重点关注医生的工作效率、记录效率和财务结果。方法:从2010年1月至2024年9月检索9个数据库,检索报告门诊医疗抄写员使用的经济或生产力结果的英语研究。两位审稿人独立筛选了1,945条独特记录;数据使用试点模板绘制图表,并按主题进行合成。结果:20项基于美国的研究符合纳入标准:9项前后评价、5项对照队列研究、2项随机对照试验(rct)、2项微观模拟模型和2项系统评价。抄写员持续提高医生的工作效率:20项研究中有19项(95%)报告增加了工作相对价值单位(wRVUs),提高了患者吞吐量,减少了记录时间。9项研究均提高了临床医生的满意度;患者体验保持稳定。经济结果各不相同:20项研究中有13项试图进行投资回报率(ROI)分析,但只有6项包括综合成本(工资、培训、许可、营业额)。在具有可预测的日程安排和未利用的能力的大容量诊所中,成本中立是可以实现的,但是财务回报严重依赖于专业、基线生产力和成本会计的严密性。结论:医疗抄写机提高了美国门诊诊所的操作效率和医生工作流程,尽管经济价值是依赖于环境和不完整的文件。非美国卫生系统需要标准化的成本框架和受控的评估来指导实施决策。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation
Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES-
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
4.30%
发文量
59
审稿时长
34 weeks
期刊介绍: Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation is an Open Access, peer-reviewed, online journal that considers manuscripts on all aspects of cost-effectiveness analysis, including conceptual or methodological work, economic evaluations, and policy analysis related to resource allocation at a national or international level. Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation is aimed at health economists, health services researchers, and policy-makers with an interest in enhancing the flow and transfer of knowledge relating to efficiency in the health sector. Manuscripts are encouraged from researchers based in low- and middle-income countries, with a view to increasing the international economic evidence base for health.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书