Efficacy of prehospital amiodarone on survival in adult out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: a retrospective observational study.

IF 1.2 Q4 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE
Journal of Critical Care Medicine Pub Date : 2026-07-27 eCollection Date: 2026-07-01 DOI:10.62838/jccm-2026-0024
Yuki Kishihara, Shunsuke Amagasa, Yosuke Homma, Takashi Tagami, Hideto Yasuda, Masahiro Kashiura, Yutaro Shinzato, Takashi Moriya
{"title":"Efficacy of prehospital amiodarone on survival in adult out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: a retrospective observational study.","authors":"Yuki Kishihara, Shunsuke Amagasa, Yosuke Homma, Takashi Tagami, Hideto Yasuda, Masahiro Kashiura, Yutaro Shinzato, Takashi Moriya","doi":"10.62838/jccm-2026-0024","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim of the study: </strong>This study sought to determine whether prehospital administration of amiodarone improves outcomes among adult patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) presenting with ventricular fibrillation (VF) or pulseless ventricular tachycardia (VT). The analysis accounted for time-dependent confounding and resuscitation time bias using real-world registry data.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>We conducted a multicenter, retrospective cohort study using a nationwide Japanese OHCA database, including adult nontraumatic shockable rhythms. The exposure was prehospital amiodarone administration at a given time, and the comparator was no amiodarone at the same time point. The comparison reflects amiodarone administration at that time versus no amiodarone, not 'amiodarone versus never-amiodarone'. The primary and secondary endpoints were favorable neurological status and survival at 30 days. Patients were matched 1:3 using time-dependent propensity score matching, followed by generalized estimating equations to address intrahospital clustering. Sensitivity analyses included covariates with standardized mean differences greater than 0.25 after matching. Associations were expressed as risk ratios (RRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 9,909 eligible patients, 56 (0.6%) remained after matching, including 19 (0.2%) who received amiodarone at the index time point. Median (IQR) age was 65 (52-76) years, and 81.8% were male. The median interval from first medical contact to drug administration was 27 (22-32) minutes. In models adjusted for timing variables and hospital clustering, amiodarone was not significantly related to favorable neurological recovery (RR, 0.45 [95% CI, 0.14-1.47]) or survival (RR, 0.74 [95% CI, 0.31-1.73]). Sensitivity analyses yielded consistent findings, though survival model convergence was limited.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Prehospital administration of amiodarone in adult OHCA patients with shockable rhythms was not associated with improved neurological or survival outcomes. However, these findings should be interpreted with caution, and further studies are warranted to confirm and extend these observations.</p>","PeriodicalId":44227,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Critical Care Medicine","volume":"12 3","pages":"426-437"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13403018/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Critical Care Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.62838/jccm-2026-0024","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/7/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim of the study: This study sought to determine whether prehospital administration of amiodarone improves outcomes among adult patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) presenting with ventricular fibrillation (VF) or pulseless ventricular tachycardia (VT). The analysis accounted for time-dependent confounding and resuscitation time bias using real-world registry data.

Material and methods: We conducted a multicenter, retrospective cohort study using a nationwide Japanese OHCA database, including adult nontraumatic shockable rhythms. The exposure was prehospital amiodarone administration at a given time, and the comparator was no amiodarone at the same time point. The comparison reflects amiodarone administration at that time versus no amiodarone, not 'amiodarone versus never-amiodarone'. The primary and secondary endpoints were favorable neurological status and survival at 30 days. Patients were matched 1:3 using time-dependent propensity score matching, followed by generalized estimating equations to address intrahospital clustering. Sensitivity analyses included covariates with standardized mean differences greater than 0.25 after matching. Associations were expressed as risk ratios (RRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs).

Results: Among 9,909 eligible patients, 56 (0.6%) remained after matching, including 19 (0.2%) who received amiodarone at the index time point. Median (IQR) age was 65 (52-76) years, and 81.8% were male. The median interval from first medical contact to drug administration was 27 (22-32) minutes. In models adjusted for timing variables and hospital clustering, amiodarone was not significantly related to favorable neurological recovery (RR, 0.45 [95% CI, 0.14-1.47]) or survival (RR, 0.74 [95% CI, 0.31-1.73]). Sensitivity analyses yielded consistent findings, though survival model convergence was limited.

Conclusions: Prehospital administration of amiodarone in adult OHCA patients with shockable rhythms was not associated with improved neurological or survival outcomes. However, these findings should be interpreted with caution, and further studies are warranted to confirm and extend these observations.

院前胺碘酮对成人院外心脏骤停患者生存的影响:一项回顾性观察研究。
研究目的:本研究旨在确定院前给药胺碘酮是否能改善以心室颤动(VF)或无脉性室性心动过速(VT)为表现的院外心脏骤停(OHCA)的成年患者的预后。该分析利用现实世界注册数据解释了时间依赖性混淆和复苏时间偏差。材料和方法:我们使用日本全国OHCA数据库进行了一项多中心、回顾性队列研究,包括成人非创伤性休克节律。暴露为院前给定时间给予胺碘酮,比较者为同一时间点未给予胺碘酮。比较反映的是当时服用胺碘酮与未服用胺碘酮,而不是“胺碘酮与未服用胺碘酮”。主要和次要终点是30天时良好的神经状态和生存。采用时间相关倾向评分匹配方法对患者进行1:3匹配,然后采用广义估计方程来解决院内聚类问题。敏感性分析纳入匹配后标准化平均差异大于0.25的协变量。相关性以95%置信区间(ci)的风险比(rr)表示。结果:9909例符合条件的患者中,配伍后剩余56例(0.6%),其中在指标时间点接受胺碘酮治疗的患者19例(0.2%)。中位(IQR)年龄为65(52-76)岁,81.8%为男性。从首次医疗接触到给药的中位时间间隔为27(22-32)分钟。在调整了时间变量和医院聚类的模型中,胺碘酮与良好的神经恢复(RR, 0.45 [95% CI, 0.14-1.47])或生存(RR, 0.74 [95% CI, 0.31-1.73])没有显著相关。敏感性分析得出了一致的结果,尽管生存模型趋同是有限的。结论:院前给药胺碘酮与具有震荡节律的成年OHCA患者的神经学或生存结果改善无关。然而,这些发现应谨慎解释,并有必要进一步研究以证实和扩展这些观察结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Critical Care Medicine
Journal of Critical Care Medicine CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE-
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
9.10%
发文量
21
审稿时长
11 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书