On-Demand Suction to Maintain a Dry Operative Field During Robotic Esophagectomy With Video

IF 1.1 Q4 ORTHOPEDICS
Shinsuke Sato, Mao Tsuru, Erina Nagai, Yusuke Taki, Masato Nishida, Masaya Watanabe, Hideyuki Kanemoto
{"title":"On-Demand Suction to Maintain a Dry Operative Field During Robotic Esophagectomy With Video","authors":"Shinsuke Sato,&nbsp;Mao Tsuru,&nbsp;Erina Nagai,&nbsp;Yusuke Taki,&nbsp;Masato Nishida,&nbsp;Masaya Watanabe,&nbsp;Hideyuki Kanemoto","doi":"10.1111/ases.70358","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Introduction</h3>\n \n <p>Lymphadenectomy around the left recurrent laryngeal nerve is one of the most technically demanding steps in esophagectomy. Even in robot-assisted esophagectomy, the operative field easily becomes wet and achieving on-demand suction remains challenging.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Materials and Surgical Technique</h3>\n \n <p>Between July 2024 and November 2025, 11 patients underwent robot-assisted esophagectomy in the prone position. We developed a simple on-demand suction technique by suturing gauze to a commercially available suction tube, allowing both the surgeon and the assistant to perform suction as needed. The modified tube can be manipulated using either robotic instruments or assistant forceps and can also be used for gentle tracheal rolling during lymphadenectomy. Furthermore, to evaluate the feasibility and safety of this technique, we conducted a retrospective comparison with 11 cases performed using the conventional method (tracheal traction with a robotic Cadiere forceps) between March 2023 and May 2024. All procedures were performed by a single surgeon.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Discussion</h3>\n \n <p>This simple and low-cost technique facilitates maintenance of a dry operative field during robot-assisted esophagectomy. Furthermore, in comparison with the conventional method, no significant differences were observed in operative time, blood loss, or the incidence of recurrent laryngeal nerve palsy; however, there was a trend toward reduced intraoperative manipulation time. These findings suggest that this technique offers comparable safety to the conventional approach while potentially contributing to improved operative field management.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":47019,"journal":{"name":"Asian Journal of Endoscopic Surgery","volume":"19 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asian Journal of Endoscopic Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ases.70358","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

Lymphadenectomy around the left recurrent laryngeal nerve is one of the most technically demanding steps in esophagectomy. Even in robot-assisted esophagectomy, the operative field easily becomes wet and achieving on-demand suction remains challenging.

Materials and Surgical Technique

Between July 2024 and November 2025, 11 patients underwent robot-assisted esophagectomy in the prone position. We developed a simple on-demand suction technique by suturing gauze to a commercially available suction tube, allowing both the surgeon and the assistant to perform suction as needed. The modified tube can be manipulated using either robotic instruments or assistant forceps and can also be used for gentle tracheal rolling during lymphadenectomy. Furthermore, to evaluate the feasibility and safety of this technique, we conducted a retrospective comparison with 11 cases performed using the conventional method (tracheal traction with a robotic Cadiere forceps) between March 2023 and May 2024. All procedures were performed by a single surgeon.

Discussion

This simple and low-cost technique facilitates maintenance of a dry operative field during robot-assisted esophagectomy. Furthermore, in comparison with the conventional method, no significant differences were observed in operative time, blood loss, or the incidence of recurrent laryngeal nerve palsy; however, there was a trend toward reduced intraoperative manipulation time. These findings suggest that this technique offers comparable safety to the conventional approach while potentially contributing to improved operative field management.

视频机器人食管切除术中按需吸痰维持干燥手术野。
简介:左侧喉返神经周围淋巴结切除术是食管癌切除术中技术要求最高的步骤之一。即使在机器人辅助食管切除术中,手术野也很容易变湿,实现按需吸痰仍然具有挑战性。材料和手术技术:2024年7月至2025年11月,11例患者采用俯卧位机器人辅助食管切除术。我们开发了一种简单的按需吸引技术,通过将纱布缝合到市售的吸引管上,允许外科医生和助手根据需要进行吸引。改进后的管子可以使用机器人器械或辅助钳进行操作,也可以在淋巴结切除术期间用于温和的气管滚动。此外,为了评估该技术的可行性和安全性,我们对2023年3月至2024年5月期间使用传统方法(使用机器人Cadiere钳进行气管牵引)的11例患者进行了回顾性比较。所有手术均由一名外科医生完成。讨论:这种简单且低成本的技术有助于在机器人辅助食管切除术中维持干手术野。此外,与常规方法相比,手术时间、出血量、喉返神经麻痹发生率均无显著差异;然而,术中操作时间有缩短的趋势。这些研究结果表明,该技术具有与传统方法相当的安全性,同时可能有助于改善手术现场管理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
10.00%
发文量
129
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书