Fathi Moustafa, Aldo Fafaj, Clayton Petro, Marisa H. Blackman, Kaela E. Blake
{"title":"Preoperative optimization for ventral hernia repair: augmented evidence review","authors":"Fathi Moustafa, Aldo Fafaj, Clayton Petro, Marisa H. Blackman, Kaela E. Blake","doi":"10.1016/j.gassur.2026.102535","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Preoperative optimization is widely recommended for patients undergoing ventral hernia repair. However, the clinical impact of individual risk factors remains uncertain. This study aimed to evaluate the association of obesity, diabetes mellitus, and smoking with postoperative outcomes and to compare these findings with surgeon practices and existing literature.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>The augmented evidence review (AER) was performed using 3 evidence streams to answer the unified question: “What are the key components of preoperative patient optimization for ventral hernia repair?” Empiric evidence was gathered using a retrospective analysis of the Abdominal Core Health Quality Collaborative database. Social media evidence was gathered by surveying practicing surgeons via the International Hernia Collaboration social media group. Artificial intelligence (AI) evidence was obtained from the OpenEvidence platform, which performed a data-driven literature review. Each evidence stream was analyzed independently before integrating it in the AER.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Obesity was associated with increased wound complications, but showed no significant association with systemic complications. Diabetes status and glycemic control were not associated with postoperative complications. Smoking was associated with increased surgical site occurrence and pneumonia. Survey results demonstrated that most surgeons consider these risk factors important. However, implementation varied, with individualized approaches favored for obesity and smoking, whereas defined thresholds were used for glycemic control. AI-derived evidence demonstrated similar heterogeneity.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>The evaluated risk factors demonstrated modest differences in postoperative outcomes, some of which were statistically significant. However, the clinical significance is mainly determined by the surgeon, as reflected by our survey. Most surgeons favored an individualized approach for obesity, followed by smoking, and less so for diabetes mellitus.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":15893,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery","volume":"30 10","pages":"Article 102535"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1091255X26002167","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/7/27 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background
Preoperative optimization is widely recommended for patients undergoing ventral hernia repair. However, the clinical impact of individual risk factors remains uncertain. This study aimed to evaluate the association of obesity, diabetes mellitus, and smoking with postoperative outcomes and to compare these findings with surgeon practices and existing literature.
Methods
The augmented evidence review (AER) was performed using 3 evidence streams to answer the unified question: “What are the key components of preoperative patient optimization for ventral hernia repair?” Empiric evidence was gathered using a retrospective analysis of the Abdominal Core Health Quality Collaborative database. Social media evidence was gathered by surveying practicing surgeons via the International Hernia Collaboration social media group. Artificial intelligence (AI) evidence was obtained from the OpenEvidence platform, which performed a data-driven literature review. Each evidence stream was analyzed independently before integrating it in the AER.
Results
Obesity was associated with increased wound complications, but showed no significant association with systemic complications. Diabetes status and glycemic control were not associated with postoperative complications. Smoking was associated with increased surgical site occurrence and pneumonia. Survey results demonstrated that most surgeons consider these risk factors important. However, implementation varied, with individualized approaches favored for obesity and smoking, whereas defined thresholds were used for glycemic control. AI-derived evidence demonstrated similar heterogeneity.
Conclusion
The evaluated risk factors demonstrated modest differences in postoperative outcomes, some of which were statistically significant. However, the clinical significance is mainly determined by the surgeon, as reflected by our survey. Most surgeons favored an individualized approach for obesity, followed by smoking, and less so for diabetes mellitus.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery is a scholarly, peer-reviewed journal that updates the surgeon on the latest developments in gastrointestinal surgery. The journal includes original articles on surgery of the digestive tract; gastrointestinal images; "How I Do It" articles, subject reviews, book reports, editorial columns, the SSAT Presidential Address, articles by a guest orator, symposia, letters, results of conferences and more. This is the official publication of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract. The journal functions as an outstanding forum for continuing education in surgery and diseases of the gastrointestinal tract.