Preoperative optimization for ventral hernia repair: augmented evidence review

IF 2.8 3区 医学 Q3 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery Pub Date : 2026-10-01 Epub Date: 2026-07-27 DOI:10.1016/j.gassur.2026.102535
Fathi Moustafa, Aldo Fafaj, Clayton Petro, Marisa H. Blackman, Kaela E. Blake
{"title":"Preoperative optimization for ventral hernia repair: augmented evidence review","authors":"Fathi Moustafa,&nbsp;Aldo Fafaj,&nbsp;Clayton Petro,&nbsp;Marisa H. Blackman,&nbsp;Kaela E. Blake","doi":"10.1016/j.gassur.2026.102535","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Preoperative optimization is widely recommended for patients undergoing ventral hernia repair. However, the clinical impact of individual risk factors remains uncertain. This study aimed to evaluate the association of obesity, diabetes mellitus, and smoking with postoperative outcomes and to compare these findings with surgeon practices and existing literature.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>The augmented evidence review (AER) was performed using 3 evidence streams to answer the unified question: “What are the key components of preoperative patient optimization for ventral hernia repair?” Empiric evidence was gathered using a retrospective analysis of the Abdominal Core Health Quality Collaborative database. Social media evidence was gathered by surveying practicing surgeons via the International Hernia Collaboration social media group. Artificial intelligence (AI) evidence was obtained from the OpenEvidence platform, which performed a data-driven literature review. Each evidence stream was analyzed independently before integrating it in the AER.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Obesity was associated with increased wound complications, but showed no significant association with systemic complications. Diabetes status and glycemic control were not associated with postoperative complications. Smoking was associated with increased surgical site occurrence and pneumonia. Survey results demonstrated that most surgeons consider these risk factors important. However, implementation varied, with individualized approaches favored for obesity and smoking, whereas defined thresholds were used for glycemic control. AI-derived evidence demonstrated similar heterogeneity.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>The evaluated risk factors demonstrated modest differences in postoperative outcomes, some of which were statistically significant. However, the clinical significance is mainly determined by the surgeon, as reflected by our survey. Most surgeons favored an individualized approach for obesity, followed by smoking, and less so for diabetes mellitus.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":15893,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery","volume":"30 10","pages":"Article 102535"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1091255X26002167","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/7/27 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Preoperative optimization is widely recommended for patients undergoing ventral hernia repair. However, the clinical impact of individual risk factors remains uncertain. This study aimed to evaluate the association of obesity, diabetes mellitus, and smoking with postoperative outcomes and to compare these findings with surgeon practices and existing literature.

Methods

The augmented evidence review (AER) was performed using 3 evidence streams to answer the unified question: “What are the key components of preoperative patient optimization for ventral hernia repair?” Empiric evidence was gathered using a retrospective analysis of the Abdominal Core Health Quality Collaborative database. Social media evidence was gathered by surveying practicing surgeons via the International Hernia Collaboration social media group. Artificial intelligence (AI) evidence was obtained from the OpenEvidence platform, which performed a data-driven literature review. Each evidence stream was analyzed independently before integrating it in the AER.

Results

Obesity was associated with increased wound complications, but showed no significant association with systemic complications. Diabetes status and glycemic control were not associated with postoperative complications. Smoking was associated with increased surgical site occurrence and pneumonia. Survey results demonstrated that most surgeons consider these risk factors important. However, implementation varied, with individualized approaches favored for obesity and smoking, whereas defined thresholds were used for glycemic control. AI-derived evidence demonstrated similar heterogeneity.

Conclusion

The evaluated risk factors demonstrated modest differences in postoperative outcomes, some of which were statistically significant. However, the clinical significance is mainly determined by the surgeon, as reflected by our survey. Most surgeons favored an individualized approach for obesity, followed by smoking, and less so for diabetes mellitus.
腹疝修补术的术前优化:增强证据回顾。
背景:腹疝修补术的术前优化被广泛推荐。然而,个体危险因素的临床影响仍不确定。本研究旨在评估肥胖、糖尿病和吸烟与术后预后的关系,并将这些发现与外科实践和现有文献进行比较。方法:采用三个证据流进行增强证据回顾(AER),以回答“腹疝修补术前患者优化的关键组成部分是什么?”这一统一问题。通过对腹部核心健康质量协作数据库的回顾性分析收集经验证据。社交媒体证据是通过国际疝气协作社交媒体小组调查执业外科医生收集的。人工智能证据是从OpenEvidence平台获得的,该平台进行了数据驱动的文献综述。每个证据流在整合到AER之前都是独立分析的。结果:肥胖与伤口并发症增加有关,但与全身并发症无显著相关性。糖尿病状态和血糖控制与术后并发症无关。吸烟与手术部位发生率和肺炎增加有关。调查结果显示,大多数外科医生认为这些危险因素很重要。然而,实施方法因肥胖和吸烟的个体化方法而异,而血糖控制则采用确定的阈值。人工智能衍生的证据也显示出类似的异质性。结论:评价的危险因素对术后预后影响不大,部分差异有统计学意义。然而,临床意义主要由外科医生决定,正如我们的调查所反映的那样。大多数外科医生倾向于个体化治疗肥胖,其次是吸烟,而对糖尿病的个体化治疗较少。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.50
自引率
3.10%
发文量
319
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery is a scholarly, peer-reviewed journal that updates the surgeon on the latest developments in gastrointestinal surgery. The journal includes original articles on surgery of the digestive tract; gastrointestinal images; "How I Do It" articles, subject reviews, book reports, editorial columns, the SSAT Presidential Address, articles by a guest orator, symposia, letters, results of conferences and more. This is the official publication of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract. The journal functions as an outstanding forum for continuing education in surgery and diseases of the gastrointestinal tract.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书