Analysis of Lip Pressure and Quality of Life Following Gummy Smile Treatment.

Q4 Dentistry
Paula Amaral Salgado Poliseli, Marcelo Palinkas, Nicole Barbosa Bettiol, Bianka Jurca Gonçalves da Motta, Paula Napolitano Gonçalves, Pedro Bastos Cruvinel, Selma Siéssere, Simone Cecilio Hallak Regalo
{"title":"Analysis of Lip Pressure and Quality of Life Following Gummy Smile Treatment.","authors":"Paula Amaral Salgado Poliseli, Marcelo Palinkas, Nicole Barbosa Bettiol, Bianka Jurca Gonçalves da Motta, Paula Napolitano Gonçalves, Pedro Bastos Cruvinel, Selma Siéssere, Simone Cecilio Hallak Regalo","doi":"10.34172/joddd.44115","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>A gummy smile is an aesthetic condition that can negatively impact self-esteem and quality of life. This longitudinal study aimed to evaluate the effects of gummy smile treatments with botulinum toxin type A and/or hyaluronic acid on lip pressure and the perceived quality of life in adult individuals.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Thirty adult individuals aged 18‒65 years, with>2 mm of gingival exposure when smiling, participated in the study. They were randomly assigned to three groups: botulinum toxin (n=10), hyaluronic acid (n=10), and a combination of both (n=10). Lip pressure was measured using the Biofeedback Pró-Fono device at baseline and 15, 30, 90, and 180 days after the procedures. Quality of life was assessed using the Glasgow Benefit Inventory, which was applied 15 days after treatment. Statistical analyses included repeated-measures ANOVA with Bonferroni correction and t-tests (<i>P</i> ± 0.05).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>All the groups showed variations in lip pressure over time, with a gradual increase up to 180 days and statistically significant differences. Intergroup comparisons across time intervals were not assessed. All three groups showed improvements in the quality of life, with the combined treatment standing out.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Aesthetic treatments for gummy smile resulted in significant changes in lip pressure over time and were associated with improvements in the quality of life.</p>","PeriodicalId":15599,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Dental Research, Dental Clinics, Dental Prospects","volume":"20 1","pages":"43-49"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-03-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13402643/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Dental Research, Dental Clinics, Dental Prospects","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.34172/joddd.44115","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/3/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Dentistry","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: A gummy smile is an aesthetic condition that can negatively impact self-esteem and quality of life. This longitudinal study aimed to evaluate the effects of gummy smile treatments with botulinum toxin type A and/or hyaluronic acid on lip pressure and the perceived quality of life in adult individuals.

Methods: Thirty adult individuals aged 18‒65 years, with>2 mm of gingival exposure when smiling, participated in the study. They were randomly assigned to three groups: botulinum toxin (n=10), hyaluronic acid (n=10), and a combination of both (n=10). Lip pressure was measured using the Biofeedback Pró-Fono device at baseline and 15, 30, 90, and 180 days after the procedures. Quality of life was assessed using the Glasgow Benefit Inventory, which was applied 15 days after treatment. Statistical analyses included repeated-measures ANOVA with Bonferroni correction and t-tests (P ± 0.05).

Results: All the groups showed variations in lip pressure over time, with a gradual increase up to 180 days and statistically significant differences. Intergroup comparisons across time intervals were not assessed. All three groups showed improvements in the quality of life, with the combined treatment standing out.

Conclusion: Aesthetic treatments for gummy smile resulted in significant changes in lip pressure over time and were associated with improvements in the quality of life.

软糖微笑治疗后唇压与生活质量分析。
简介:黏黏的微笑是一种审美状况,会对自尊和生活质量产生负面影响。这项纵向研究旨在评估含A型肉毒杆菌毒素和/或透明质酸的软性微笑治疗对成人唇压和感知生活质量的影响。方法:30例年龄在18-65岁之间,微笑时牙龈外露量为bbb20 mm的成年人参与研究。他们被随机分为三组:肉毒杆菌毒素(n=10),透明质酸(n=10),以及两者的组合(n=10)。在基线和术后15、30、90和180天使用Biofeedback Pró-Fono装置测量唇压。治疗后15天使用格拉斯哥福利量表评估生活质量。统计分析采用Bonferroni校正的重复测量方差分析和t检验(P±0.05)。结果:各组的唇压随时间变化,在180天内逐渐升高,差异有统计学意义。没有评估跨时间间隔的组间比较。所有三组患者的生活质量都有所改善,其中联合治疗尤为突出。结论:假性微笑的美容治疗随着时间的推移导致唇压的显著变化,并与生活质量的改善有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
23
审稿时长
25 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Dental Research Dental Clinics Dental Prospects (JODDD) is a Platinum* Open Access, peer-reviewed quarterly indexed journal that publishes articles of basic, clinical, and prospective nature in all areas of dentistry and oral health.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书