Police custody healthcare: The case for the AAAQ framework.

IF 2.2 4区 医学 Q3 HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES
Gethin Rees, Stephanie Mulrine, Michelle Addison, Mwenza Blell, Tracy Finch, Iain McKinnon
{"title":"Police custody healthcare: The case for the AAAQ framework.","authors":"Gethin Rees, Stephanie Mulrine, Michelle Addison, Mwenza Blell, Tracy Finch, Iain McKinnon","doi":"10.1177/13558196261471367","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>ObjectivesTo apply the AAAQ (Available, Accessible, Acceptable and Good Quality) Framework for healthcare as an analytical lens for healthcare delivery in police custody suites in England and Wales.MethodsWe investigated two English police forces via three discrete work packages: an ethnography of four custody suites (two custody suites per police force); semi-structured interviews with professionals (Healthcare Professionals, Police Custody Sergeants and Detention Officers) and persons with Lived Experience of police custody detention (33 professional and 41 Lived Experience interviews); and documentary analysis of 3,200 police custody risk assessments (1,600 per force) and 40 case logs (20 per force). Collaborative qualitative thematic analysis was performed by the research team, but also included peer analysts from a Third Sector organisation.ResultsWe identified that police custody healthcare in its current form does not meet many of the standards of the AAAQ Framework. Healthcare in police custody is not Available at the point of need due to a lack of embedded healthcare professionals; it is not Acceptable nor Accessible to all due to stigmatised assumptions about detained persons and scepticism about their reasons for requesting medication; and it is not Good Quality due to private providers having different Patient Group Directives resulting in a \"Postcode Lottery\" of treatments based on location of arrest. Insufficient resourcing of healthcare by private providers is the primary cause for these lapses, so we recommend police custody healthcare fall under the commissioning of NHS England Health and Justice to provide some oversight and governance for this domain.ConclusionsThe AAAQ Framework provides a basic set of healthcare standards that should be met in police custody suites. Beyond custody, as traditional forms of healthcare become increasingly carceral (especially maternity services), the AAAQ could also be fruitfully employed in other areas of healthcare nationally and internationally.</p>","PeriodicalId":15953,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Health Services Research & Policy","volume":" ","pages":"13558196261471367"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Health Services Research & Policy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/13558196261471367","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ObjectivesTo apply the AAAQ (Available, Accessible, Acceptable and Good Quality) Framework for healthcare as an analytical lens for healthcare delivery in police custody suites in England and Wales.MethodsWe investigated two English police forces via three discrete work packages: an ethnography of four custody suites (two custody suites per police force); semi-structured interviews with professionals (Healthcare Professionals, Police Custody Sergeants and Detention Officers) and persons with Lived Experience of police custody detention (33 professional and 41 Lived Experience interviews); and documentary analysis of 3,200 police custody risk assessments (1,600 per force) and 40 case logs (20 per force). Collaborative qualitative thematic analysis was performed by the research team, but also included peer analysts from a Third Sector organisation.ResultsWe identified that police custody healthcare in its current form does not meet many of the standards of the AAAQ Framework. Healthcare in police custody is not Available at the point of need due to a lack of embedded healthcare professionals; it is not Acceptable nor Accessible to all due to stigmatised assumptions about detained persons and scepticism about their reasons for requesting medication; and it is not Good Quality due to private providers having different Patient Group Directives resulting in a "Postcode Lottery" of treatments based on location of arrest. Insufficient resourcing of healthcare by private providers is the primary cause for these lapses, so we recommend police custody healthcare fall under the commissioning of NHS England Health and Justice to provide some oversight and governance for this domain.ConclusionsThe AAAQ Framework provides a basic set of healthcare standards that should be met in police custody suites. Beyond custody, as traditional forms of healthcare become increasingly carceral (especially maternity services), the AAAQ could also be fruitfully employed in other areas of healthcare nationally and internationally.

警察拘留医疗保健:AAAQ框架的案例。
目的应用AAAQ(可用、可及、可接受和高质量)医疗保健框架,作为英格兰和威尔士警察拘留所医疗保健服务的分析视角。方法我们通过三个独立的工作包调查了两个英国警察部队:四个拘留组的人种志(每个警察部队两个拘留组);与专业人员(医疗保健专业人员、警察拘留警长和拘留主任)和有过警方拘留和拘留经历的人士进行半结构化访谈(33名专业人员和41名亲身经历访谈);对3200份警察拘留风险评估(每支部队1600份)和40份案件记录(每支部队20份)进行文献分析。合作定性专题分析由研究团队进行,但也包括来自第三部门组织的同行分析师。结果我们发现,目前形式的警察拘留医疗不符合AAAQ框架的许多标准。由于缺乏嵌入式医疗保健专业人员,在需要时无法在警察拘留所提供医疗保健;由于对被拘留者的污名化假设和对其要求药物的理由的怀疑,它不是所有人都能接受或获得的;而且由于私人提供者有不同的患者群体指令,导致基于逮捕地点的治疗“邮政编码彩票”,因此质量不高。私人医疗保健提供者的资源不足是造成这些失误的主要原因,因此我们建议警察拘留医疗保健属于NHS英格兰卫生和司法的委托,为这一领域提供一些监督和治理。结论:AAAQ框架提供了一套基本的卫生保健标准,应符合警察拘留套房。除了监护之外,随着传统形式的医疗保健(特别是产妇服务)变得越来越注重护理,AAAQ也可以在国家和国际的其他医疗保健领域得到有效应用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
4.20%
发文量
39
期刊介绍: Journal of Health Services Research & Policy provides a unique opportunity to explore the ideas, policies and decisions shaping health services throughout the world. Edited and peer-reviewed by experts in the field and with a high academic standard and multidisciplinary approach, readers will gain a greater understanding of the current issues in healthcare policy and research. The journal"s strong international editorial advisory board also ensures that readers obtain a truly global and insightful perspective.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书