A cross-sectional study of associations between workforce connections and general trust in the US health care system.

IF 2.2 4区 医学 Q3 HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES
Mark Benton
{"title":"A cross-sectional study of associations between workforce connections and general trust in the US health care system.","authors":"Mark Benton","doi":"10.1177/13558196261472886","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>ObjectivesThe objective of the study is to examine associations between connections to the workforce and trust in the health care system in the United States.MethodsWe examine cross-sectional survey data from the 2024 Health Information National Trends Survey (HINTS, <i>n</i> = 7,278) descriptively and statistically. After examining sample characteristics, trust is examined by income and primary employment status. Bivariate and multivariate ordinary least squares regression models are created to examine associations of trust in the health care system.ResultsThere are associations between connections to the workforce and trust in the United States' health care system. Students, retired people, and homemaker/caregivers have comparatively high trust in the health care system, although the association for retired people loses significance with controls and homemaker/caregiver findings are only significant with controls. People with a higher household income tend to trust the health care system more than people with a lower household income.ConclusionAccess to and payment for health care in the United States is interwoven with connections to the workforce, with trust seemingly associated with an ability to pay as indicated by income and employment status. Trust in the health care system is still high but is lower among key groups, especially those with lower household incomes and key occupational groups. Trust in this study was highest among those with lower workforce obligations who may still have indirect access to health care payment such as homemaker/caregivers, students, and older adults with access to public health care programs. These findings highlight the need to prioritize outreach and communication with different kinds of people who have low trust in the health care system.</p>","PeriodicalId":15953,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Health Services Research & Policy","volume":" ","pages":"13558196261472886"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Health Services Research & Policy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/13558196261472886","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ObjectivesThe objective of the study is to examine associations between connections to the workforce and trust in the health care system in the United States.MethodsWe examine cross-sectional survey data from the 2024 Health Information National Trends Survey (HINTS, n = 7,278) descriptively and statistically. After examining sample characteristics, trust is examined by income and primary employment status. Bivariate and multivariate ordinary least squares regression models are created to examine associations of trust in the health care system.ResultsThere are associations between connections to the workforce and trust in the United States' health care system. Students, retired people, and homemaker/caregivers have comparatively high trust in the health care system, although the association for retired people loses significance with controls and homemaker/caregiver findings are only significant with controls. People with a higher household income tend to trust the health care system more than people with a lower household income.ConclusionAccess to and payment for health care in the United States is interwoven with connections to the workforce, with trust seemingly associated with an ability to pay as indicated by income and employment status. Trust in the health care system is still high but is lower among key groups, especially those with lower household incomes and key occupational groups. Trust in this study was highest among those with lower workforce obligations who may still have indirect access to health care payment such as homemaker/caregivers, students, and older adults with access to public health care programs. These findings highlight the need to prioritize outreach and communication with different kinds of people who have low trust in the health care system.

在美国医疗保健系统的劳动力连接和一般信任之间的关系的横断面研究。
目的本研究的目的是研究在美国与劳动力的联系和对医疗保健系统的信任之间的关系。方法对2024年健康信息全国趋势调查(HINTS, n = 7278)的横断面调查数据进行描述性和统计学分析。在检验样本特征后,通过收入和主要就业状况来检验信任。创建双变量和多变量普通最小二乘回归模型来检查卫生保健系统中的信任关联。结果:与劳动力的联系与对美国医疗保健系统的信任之间存在关联。学生、退休人员和家庭主妇/护理人员对医疗保健系统的信任度相对较高,尽管退休人员的相关性在对照组中失去了显著性,而家庭主妇/护理人员的调查结果仅在对照组中显著。家庭收入较高的人往往比家庭收入较低的人更信任医疗保健系统。结论:在美国,医疗保健的获得和支付与劳动力的联系交织在一起,信任似乎与收入和就业状况所表明的支付能力有关。对卫生保健系统的信任仍然很高,但在关键群体中,特别是家庭收入较低和关键职业群体中,信任度较低。在这项研究中,信任程度最高的是那些劳动义务较低、可能仍然间接获得医疗保健支付的人,如家庭主妇/护理人员、学生和可以获得公共医疗保健计划的老年人。这些发现强调需要优先考虑与对卫生保健系统信任度较低的不同类型的人进行外展和沟通。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
4.20%
发文量
39
期刊介绍: Journal of Health Services Research & Policy provides a unique opportunity to explore the ideas, policies and decisions shaping health services throughout the world. Edited and peer-reviewed by experts in the field and with a high academic standard and multidisciplinary approach, readers will gain a greater understanding of the current issues in healthcare policy and research. The journal"s strong international editorial advisory board also ensures that readers obtain a truly global and insightful perspective.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书