{"title":"Accomplished normalization, enduring exceptionalism: Aging with HIV in the era of antiretroviral treatment.","authors":"Tony Sandset","doi":"10.1177/13634593261469818","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This article examines how adults aged 50 years and older living with HIV in Norway negotiate the contemporary shift from AIDS exceptionalism to biomedical normalization, and what this reveal about the endurance of exceptionalism \"by other means.\" Drawing on 21 semi-structured life-course interviews with people living with HIV, including long-term survivors diagnosed prior to combination ART in 1996, and analyzed through reflexive thematic analysis, the study identifies three patterned meanings. First, participants described \"accomplished normalization\": HIV was narrated as clinically stable and increasingly comparable to other age-related conditions, supported by simplified ART routines and routinized follow-up care. Second, normalization was \"disrupted\" and at times actively contested, through stigma encounters, disclosure dilemmas, and especially sexuality and intimacy reactivated HIV as exceptional despite biomedical control. Third, participants articulated \"discursive undetectability\": viral suppression was experienced as a biomedical achievement, yet many perceived declining public and professional knowledge about contemporary HIV, producing renewed fear, misrecognition, and incentives to conceal serostatus. The findings suggest that later-life HIV is characterized by an ambivalent coexistence of clinical normalization and social exceptionalism, and that meaningful normalization requires sustained public education and recognition alongside pharmaceutical efficacy.</p>","PeriodicalId":12944,"journal":{"name":"Health","volume":" ","pages":"13634593261469818"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/13634593261469818","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
This article examines how adults aged 50 years and older living with HIV in Norway negotiate the contemporary shift from AIDS exceptionalism to biomedical normalization, and what this reveal about the endurance of exceptionalism "by other means." Drawing on 21 semi-structured life-course interviews with people living with HIV, including long-term survivors diagnosed prior to combination ART in 1996, and analyzed through reflexive thematic analysis, the study identifies three patterned meanings. First, participants described "accomplished normalization": HIV was narrated as clinically stable and increasingly comparable to other age-related conditions, supported by simplified ART routines and routinized follow-up care. Second, normalization was "disrupted" and at times actively contested, through stigma encounters, disclosure dilemmas, and especially sexuality and intimacy reactivated HIV as exceptional despite biomedical control. Third, participants articulated "discursive undetectability": viral suppression was experienced as a biomedical achievement, yet many perceived declining public and professional knowledge about contemporary HIV, producing renewed fear, misrecognition, and incentives to conceal serostatus. The findings suggest that later-life HIV is characterized by an ambivalent coexistence of clinical normalization and social exceptionalism, and that meaningful normalization requires sustained public education and recognition alongside pharmaceutical efficacy.
期刊介绍:
Health: is published four times per year and attempts in each number to offer a mix of articles that inform or that provoke debate. The readership of the journal is wide and drawn from different disciplines and from workers both inside and outside the health care professions. Widely abstracted, Health: ensures authors an extensive and informed readership for their work. It also seeks to offer authors as short a delay as possible between submission and publication. Most articles are reviewed within 4-6 weeks of submission and those accepted are published within a year of that decision.