Stem cell and extracellular vesicle therapies for wound healing: An umbrella review of predominantly diabetic and preclinical evidence.

IF 3.7 4区 医学 Q3 CELL & TISSUE ENGINEERING
Cell Transplantation Pub Date : 2026-01-01 Epub Date: 2026-07-28 DOI:10.1177/09636897261452345
Nadiar M Mussin, Amin Tamadon, Mahdi Mahdipour, Kulyash R Zhilisbayeva, Madina A Kurmanalina, Akmaral Baspakova, Mustafa R Rysuly, Amirkan A Azimbayev, Vyacheslav B Ogay, Ramazon Safarzoda Sharoffidin
{"title":"Stem cell and extracellular vesicle therapies for wound healing: An umbrella review of predominantly diabetic and preclinical evidence.","authors":"Nadiar M Mussin, Amin Tamadon, Mahdi Mahdipour, Kulyash R Zhilisbayeva, Madina A Kurmanalina, Akmaral Baspakova, Mustafa R Rysuly, Amirkan A Azimbayev, Vyacheslav B Ogay, Ramazon Safarzoda Sharoffidin","doi":"10.1177/09636897261452345","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Chronic and complex skin wounds, including diabetic ulcers and burns, represent a major clinical challenge with substantial morbidity and healthcare costs. Regenerative approaches have evolved from stem cell-based therapies toward stem cell-free strategies, particularly mesenchymal stroma/stem cell-derived extracellular vesicles (MSC-EVs). However, the relative strength, consistency, and translational readiness of these approaches remain unclear. The aim of this study is to synthesize and critically appraise evidence from systematic reviews and meta-analyses on cell-based and cell-free regenerative therapies for wound healing, with emphasis on clinical relevance, methodological quality, and recent developments. An umbrella review was conducted in accordance with PRISMA 2020 guidance. PubMed/MEDLINE, Scopus, and Web of Science were searched for systematic reviews and meta-analyses published in English within the last 5 years. Eligible reviews evaluated cell-based therapies and/or extracellular vesicle-based interventions for skin wound healing in clinical and/or animal models. Methodological quality was assessed using AMSTAR-2, and overlap of primary studies was evaluated using the corrected covered area (CCA). Seven systematic reviews and meta-analyses were included, encompassing both clinical and preclinical evidence. Notably, the majority of included evidence was derived from diabetic wound models, particularly in preclinical animal studies. Cell-based therapies demonstrated clinically relevant benefits in specific settings, such as autologous skin cell suspensions for burns and biologic skin substitutes for diabetic foot ulcers, although certainty of evidence was low to moderate. In contrast, MSC-EVs showed large and consistent effects on wound closure, angiogenesis, collagen deposition, and inflammatory modulation in preclinical models. No randomized human trials of EV-based wound therapies were identified. Current evidence suggests a paradigm shift toward stem cell-free regenerative strategies in wound healing. While cell therapies have limited but established clinical roles, MSC-EVs offer strong preclinical efficacy and translational potential. Standardization, regulatory alignment, and well-designed clinical trials are required to enable safe clinical implementation.</p>","PeriodicalId":9721,"journal":{"name":"Cell Transplantation","volume":"35 ","pages":"9636897261452345"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13420067/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cell Transplantation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/09636897261452345","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/7/28 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CELL & TISSUE ENGINEERING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Chronic and complex skin wounds, including diabetic ulcers and burns, represent a major clinical challenge with substantial morbidity and healthcare costs. Regenerative approaches have evolved from stem cell-based therapies toward stem cell-free strategies, particularly mesenchymal stroma/stem cell-derived extracellular vesicles (MSC-EVs). However, the relative strength, consistency, and translational readiness of these approaches remain unclear. The aim of this study is to synthesize and critically appraise evidence from systematic reviews and meta-analyses on cell-based and cell-free regenerative therapies for wound healing, with emphasis on clinical relevance, methodological quality, and recent developments. An umbrella review was conducted in accordance with PRISMA 2020 guidance. PubMed/MEDLINE, Scopus, and Web of Science were searched for systematic reviews and meta-analyses published in English within the last 5 years. Eligible reviews evaluated cell-based therapies and/or extracellular vesicle-based interventions for skin wound healing in clinical and/or animal models. Methodological quality was assessed using AMSTAR-2, and overlap of primary studies was evaluated using the corrected covered area (CCA). Seven systematic reviews and meta-analyses were included, encompassing both clinical and preclinical evidence. Notably, the majority of included evidence was derived from diabetic wound models, particularly in preclinical animal studies. Cell-based therapies demonstrated clinically relevant benefits in specific settings, such as autologous skin cell suspensions for burns and biologic skin substitutes for diabetic foot ulcers, although certainty of evidence was low to moderate. In contrast, MSC-EVs showed large and consistent effects on wound closure, angiogenesis, collagen deposition, and inflammatory modulation in preclinical models. No randomized human trials of EV-based wound therapies were identified. Current evidence suggests a paradigm shift toward stem cell-free regenerative strategies in wound healing. While cell therapies have limited but established clinical roles, MSC-EVs offer strong preclinical efficacy and translational potential. Standardization, regulatory alignment, and well-designed clinical trials are required to enable safe clinical implementation.

干细胞和细胞外囊泡治疗伤口愈合:主要是糖尿病和临床前证据的综述。
慢性和复杂的皮肤伤口,包括糖尿病性溃疡和烧伤,是一项重大的临床挑战,发病率和医疗费用都很高。再生方法已经从基于干细胞的治疗发展到无干细胞策略,特别是间充质基质/干细胞衍生的细胞外囊泡(msc - ev)。然而,这些方法的相对强度、一致性和转化准备程度仍然不清楚。本研究的目的是综合和批判性地评估来自基于细胞和无细胞再生治疗伤口愈合的系统综述和荟萃分析的证据,重点是临床相关性、方法学质量和最新进展。根据PRISMA 2020指南进行了全面审查。检索了PubMed/MEDLINE、Scopus和Web of Science,检索了近5年内发表的英文系统综述和荟萃分析。符合条件的综述在临床和/或动物模型中评估了基于细胞的治疗和/或基于细胞外囊泡的干预对皮肤伤口愈合的影响。使用AMSTAR-2评估方法学质量,使用校正覆盖面积(CCA)评估初步研究的重叠。纳入了七个系统综述和荟萃分析,包括临床和临床前证据。值得注意的是,大多数纳入的证据来自糖尿病伤口模型,特别是临床前动物研究。细胞疗法在特定情况下显示出临床相关的益处,例如自体皮肤细胞悬浮液治疗烧伤和生物皮肤替代品治疗糖尿病足溃疡,尽管证据的确定性为低至中等。相比之下,在临床前模型中,msc - ev在伤口愈合、血管生成、胶原沉积和炎症调节方面表现出巨大而一致的作用。没有发现基于ev的伤口治疗的随机人体试验。目前的证据表明,无干细胞再生策略在伤口愈合中的范式转变。虽然细胞疗法的临床作用有限,但msc - ev具有强大的临床前疗效和转化潜力。为了实现安全的临床实施,需要标准化、监管一致性和精心设计的临床试验。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Cell Transplantation
Cell Transplantation 生物-细胞与组织工程
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
3.00%
发文量
97
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: Cell Transplantation, The Regenerative Medicine Journal is an open access, peer reviewed journal that is published 12 times annually. Cell Transplantation is a multi-disciplinary forum for publication of articles on cell transplantation and its applications to human diseases. Articles focus on a myriad of topics including the physiological, medical, pre-clinical, tissue engineering, stem cell, and device-oriented aspects of the nervous, endocrine, cardiovascular, and endothelial systems, as well as genetically engineered cells. Cell Transplantation also reports on relevant technological advances, clinical studies, and regulatory considerations related to the implantation of cells into the body in order to provide complete coverage of the field.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书