Ande Marchini, Chinelo Onyenekwu, Patricia Ruegsegger, Christine Fuja, William Rose, Caitlin Raymond
{"title":"ABO discrepancies revealing rare weak A subgroups: a 2-case series.","authors":"Ande Marchini, Chinelo Onyenekwu, Patricia Ruegsegger, Christine Fuja, William Rose, Caitlin Raymond","doi":"10.1093/labmed/lmag043","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>ABO discrepancies caused by weak A subgroups are uncommon but clinically important because they can lead to mistyping and inappropriate transfusion management.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We present the cases of 2 patients at an academic medical center who were historically typed as group O but were found to harbor weak A subgroups upon detailed investigation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In case 1, the patient's red blood cells demonstrated weak reactivity with anti-A reagent on forward typing, with anti-A1 and anti-B identified on reverse typing. In case 2, the patient's red blood cells were nonreactive with anti-A reagent on forward typing but did agglutinate with anti-A,B reagent. Reverse typing showed weak reactivity against A1 and A2 cells, with strong reactivity against B cells, consistent with an anti-A antibody. In both cases, molecular genotyping performed at a reference laboratory returned results consistent with an Aw or Ael allele.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>These cases illustrate the serologic spectrum of weak A phenotypes, highlight the variable sensitivity of ABO reagents in detecting minimal antigen expression, and underscore the possible utility of molecular characterization when serologic results are ambiguous.</p>","PeriodicalId":94124,"journal":{"name":"Laboratory medicine","volume":"57 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Laboratory medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/labmed/lmag043","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction: ABO discrepancies caused by weak A subgroups are uncommon but clinically important because they can lead to mistyping and inappropriate transfusion management.
Methods: We present the cases of 2 patients at an academic medical center who were historically typed as group O but were found to harbor weak A subgroups upon detailed investigation.
Results: In case 1, the patient's red blood cells demonstrated weak reactivity with anti-A reagent on forward typing, with anti-A1 and anti-B identified on reverse typing. In case 2, the patient's red blood cells were nonreactive with anti-A reagent on forward typing but did agglutinate with anti-A,B reagent. Reverse typing showed weak reactivity against A1 and A2 cells, with strong reactivity against B cells, consistent with an anti-A antibody. In both cases, molecular genotyping performed at a reference laboratory returned results consistent with an Aw or Ael allele.
Discussion: These cases illustrate the serologic spectrum of weak A phenotypes, highlight the variable sensitivity of ABO reagents in detecting minimal antigen expression, and underscore the possible utility of molecular characterization when serologic results are ambiguous.