Predicting changes in unforgiveness following a relational transgression in couples.

IF 2.4 2区 心理学 Q2 FAMILY STUDIES
Mireille Jean, Susan D Boon, Audrey-Ann Lefebvre, Audrey Brassard, Marie-Ève Daspe, Katherine Péloquin
{"title":"Predicting changes in unforgiveness following a relational transgression in couples.","authors":"Mireille Jean, Susan D Boon, Audrey-Ann Lefebvre, Audrey Brassard, Marie-Ève Daspe, Katherine Péloquin","doi":"10.1037/fam0001500","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Relational transgressions in couples, defined as violations of explicit or implicit relationship norms, can lead to the experience of unforgiveness in the offended partner, which includes cognitive-evaluative, emotional-ruminative, and offender reconstrual dimensions. No studies have investigated the potential individual and contextual predictors of unforgiveness and its evolution over time in couples who have experienced a transgression. This study aimed to examine the association between (a) attachment insecurities (anxiety and avoidance), the level of subjective severity, and the contextual characteristics of the transgression (whether the transgression was recent and the presence of other hurtful events) and (b) the three unforgiveness dimensions and their evolution over a year. Couples (<i>N</i> = 245) completed online questionnaires at five time points (0, 3, 6, 9, and 12 months), reporting on their experience of unforgiveness about a specific relational transgression that they experienced. Latent growth curve analyses revealed that the three dimensions of unforgiveness decreased over the study period. Attachment anxiety was associated with a higher baseline level of emotional-ruminative unforgiveness, whereas attachment avoidance was associated with higher baseline levels of all three dimensions. Also, while perceiving the transgression as being more severe was associated with higher unforgiveness on all three dimensions at baseline, it was associated with a steeper decrease in each dimension. The results provide material for a rich discussion on how partners in close relationships internally experience unforgiveness following a relational transgression and what may predict this experience over time. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2026 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":48381,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Family Psychology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Family Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/fam0001500","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"FAMILY STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Relational transgressions in couples, defined as violations of explicit or implicit relationship norms, can lead to the experience of unforgiveness in the offended partner, which includes cognitive-evaluative, emotional-ruminative, and offender reconstrual dimensions. No studies have investigated the potential individual and contextual predictors of unforgiveness and its evolution over time in couples who have experienced a transgression. This study aimed to examine the association between (a) attachment insecurities (anxiety and avoidance), the level of subjective severity, and the contextual characteristics of the transgression (whether the transgression was recent and the presence of other hurtful events) and (b) the three unforgiveness dimensions and their evolution over a year. Couples (N = 245) completed online questionnaires at five time points (0, 3, 6, 9, and 12 months), reporting on their experience of unforgiveness about a specific relational transgression that they experienced. Latent growth curve analyses revealed that the three dimensions of unforgiveness decreased over the study period. Attachment anxiety was associated with a higher baseline level of emotional-ruminative unforgiveness, whereas attachment avoidance was associated with higher baseline levels of all three dimensions. Also, while perceiving the transgression as being more severe was associated with higher unforgiveness on all three dimensions at baseline, it was associated with a steeper decrease in each dimension. The results provide material for a rich discussion on how partners in close relationships internally experience unforgiveness following a relational transgression and what may predict this experience over time. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2026 APA, all rights reserved).

预测夫妻之间在关系越轨后不原谅的变化。
夫妻关系中的越轨行为,被定义为对显性或隐性关系规范的违反,可以导致被冒犯的一方不被原谅的经历,包括认知-评估,情感-反思和冒犯者重建维度。目前还没有研究调查过在经历过过错的夫妻中,不原谅的潜在个体和环境预测因素及其随时间的演变。本研究旨在探讨(a)依恋不安全感(焦虑和回避)、主观严重程度和犯罪的背景特征(犯罪是否最近发生和是否存在其他伤害事件)之间的关系,以及(b)三个不宽恕维度及其在一年内的演变。245对夫妇(N = 245)在5个时间点(0、3、6、9和12个月)完成了在线调查问卷,报告了他们对某一特定关系越轨行为的不被原谅的经历。潜在增长曲线分析显示,在研究期间,不原谅的三个维度都有所下降。依恋焦虑与较高的情绪反刍不宽恕基线水平相关,而依恋回避与所有三个维度的较高基线水平相关。此外,虽然在基线上,认为越界行为越严重,在所有三个维度上的不宽恕程度都越高,但在每个维度上的不宽恕程度都下降得更快。研究结果为探讨亲密关系中的伴侣在关系越界后是如何经历不被原谅的,以及随着时间的推移如何预测这种经历提供了丰富的材料。(PsycInfo数据库记录(c) 2026 APA,版权所有)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
3.70%
发文量
200
期刊介绍: Journal of Family Psychology offers cutting-edge, groundbreaking, state-of-the-art, and innovative empirical research with real-world applicability in the field of family psychology. This premiere family research journal is devoted to the study of the family system, broadly defined, from multiple perspectives and to the application of psychological methods to advance knowledge related to family research, patterns and processes, and assessment and intervention, as well as to policies relevant to advancing the quality of life for families.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书