Serum or Plasma Oncostatin M for Predicting Primary Non-Response to Tumor Necrosis Factor-α Antagonist Therapy in Inflammatory Bowel Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Maxwell A Barffour, Elizabeth Karanja, Mustafa Gandhi, Susan S Kais, Saurabh Kapur, Yezaz A Ghouri
{"title":"Serum or Plasma Oncostatin M for Predicting Primary Non-Response to Tumor Necrosis Factor-α Antagonist Therapy in Inflammatory Bowel Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.","authors":"Maxwell A Barffour, Elizabeth Karanja, Mustafa Gandhi, Susan S Kais, Saurabh Kapur, Yezaz A Ghouri","doi":"10.3390/clinpract16070124","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background</b>: Over 30% of patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) experience primary non-response to tumor necrosis factor-α antagonists (anti-TNFs). Oncostatin M (OSM), a TNF-α-independent pro-inflammatory signaling cytokine, is emerging as a potential predictive biomarker of treatment response. Through a systematic review and meta-analysis, we assessed the utility of baseline serum or plasma OSM for predicting anti-TNF response in IBD patients. <b>Methods</b>: We searched PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science through March 2026 for studies reporting associations between baseline serum/plasma OSM and endoscopic or clinical response to anti-TNF therapy in adult IBD patients. We used a bivariate random-effects model to estimate pooled sensitivity, specificity, diagnostic odds ratio (DOR), and area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve (AUC). Quality was assessed using QUADAS-2. <b>Results</b>: Data from four studies (<i>n</i> = 441 patients) were pooled. We estimated a pooled sensitivity of 82.8% (95% CI 71.4-90.3%) and a specificity of 88.4% (95% CI 82.7-92.4%) for predicting anti-TNF non-response. The pooled AUC was 0.899 (95% CI 0.858-0.940), with low heterogeneity (I<sup>2</sup> = 16.0%). The pooled DOR was 36.7 (95% CI 15.7-85.8), with a positive likelihood ratio of 7.1 and a negative likelihood ratio of 0.19. Risk of bias was low across the studies. <b>Conclusions</b>: Higher serum OSM was associated with treatment failure in IBD patients receiving anti-TNF therapy, with a pooled AUC of 0.899 in assay-stratified analysis and 0.820 when all studies were included. However, the small number of available studies, substantial variability in OSM cutoffs (14-233.6 pg/mL) and assay heterogeneity limit the robustness and generalizability and call for additional prospective data to more-robustly characterize the clinical utility of OSM.</p>","PeriodicalId":45306,"journal":{"name":"Clinics and Practice","volume":"16 7","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13408984/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinics and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/clinpract16070124","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Over 30% of patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) experience primary non-response to tumor necrosis factor-α antagonists (anti-TNFs). Oncostatin M (OSM), a TNF-α-independent pro-inflammatory signaling cytokine, is emerging as a potential predictive biomarker of treatment response. Through a systematic review and meta-analysis, we assessed the utility of baseline serum or plasma OSM for predicting anti-TNF response in IBD patients. Methods: We searched PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science through March 2026 for studies reporting associations between baseline serum/plasma OSM and endoscopic or clinical response to anti-TNF therapy in adult IBD patients. We used a bivariate random-effects model to estimate pooled sensitivity, specificity, diagnostic odds ratio (DOR), and area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve (AUC). Quality was assessed using QUADAS-2. Results: Data from four studies (n = 441 patients) were pooled. We estimated a pooled sensitivity of 82.8% (95% CI 71.4-90.3%) and a specificity of 88.4% (95% CI 82.7-92.4%) for predicting anti-TNF non-response. The pooled AUC was 0.899 (95% CI 0.858-0.940), with low heterogeneity (I2 = 16.0%). The pooled DOR was 36.7 (95% CI 15.7-85.8), with a positive likelihood ratio of 7.1 and a negative likelihood ratio of 0.19. Risk of bias was low across the studies. Conclusions: Higher serum OSM was associated with treatment failure in IBD patients receiving anti-TNF therapy, with a pooled AUC of 0.899 in assay-stratified analysis and 0.820 when all studies were included. However, the small number of available studies, substantial variability in OSM cutoffs (14-233.6 pg/mL) and assay heterogeneity limit the robustness and generalizability and call for additional prospective data to more-robustly characterize the clinical utility of OSM.
背景:超过30%的炎症性肠病(IBD)患者对肿瘤坏死因子-α拮抗剂(anti- tnf)原发性无反应。肿瘤抑制素M (OSM)是一种不依赖TNF-α-的促炎信号细胞因子,正成为治疗反应的潜在预测性生物标志物。通过系统回顾和荟萃分析,我们评估了基线血清或血浆OSM预测IBD患者抗tnf反应的效用。方法:我们检索了PubMed、Embase、Cochrane Library和Web of Science,检索了截至2026年3月的研究报告,包括基线血清/血浆OSM与成人IBD患者抗tnf治疗的内镜或临床反应之间的关联。我们使用双变量随机效应模型来估计合并敏感性、特异性、诊断优势比(DOR)和受试者工作特征曲线下面积(AUC)。采用QUADAS-2评估质量。结果:汇总了4项研究(n = 441例患者)的数据。我们估计预测抗tnf无反应的总敏感性为82.8% (95% CI 71.4-90.3%),特异性为88.4% (95% CI 82.7-92.4%)。合并AUC为0.899 (95% CI 0.858-0.940),异质性较低(I2 = 16.0%)。合并DOR为36.7 (95% CI 15.7-85.8),阳性似然比为7.1,阴性似然比为0.19。所有研究的偏倚风险都很低。结论:在接受抗tnf治疗的IBD患者中,较高的血清OSM与治疗失败相关,在分层分析中,合并AUC为0.899,在纳入所有研究时,合并AUC为0.820。然而,可用的研究数量少,OSM截止值的巨大变异性(14-233.6 pg/mL)和分析异质性限制了稳健性和普遍性,需要额外的前瞻性数据来更有力地表征OSM的临床应用。