Bundling medical and pharmacy benefits: Impact on medical costs.

IF 3.3 4区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Eric S Wilkinson, Guy David, Reetika Kumar, Philip A Saynisch, Aaron Smith-McLallen
{"title":"Bundling medical and pharmacy benefits: Impact on medical costs.","authors":"Eric S Wilkinson, Guy David, Reetika Kumar, Philip A Saynisch, Aaron Smith-McLallen","doi":"10.18553/jmcp.2026.32.8.945","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Employers are increasingly seeking strategies to manage rising health care costs, including bundling or carving out specific benefits like pharmacy coverage. Although some studies suggest that integrating medical and pharmacy benefits leads to reduced medical costs, the mechanism remains unclear.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the impact of bundling medical and pharmacy benefits on medical costs and utilization among self-funded employer groups and explore the potential role of population health management programs (PHMPs) as a mechanism for driving savings.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective, propensity score-matched, longitudinal cohort analysis used administrative claims data from a large health plan in Southeastern Pennsylvania. Self-funded group plan participants were included in the analysis if they had integrated medical and pharmacy benefits in both 2022 and 2023 (integrated group) or if they lacked integrated benefits in either year (comparison group). We additionally required that these plan participants did not experience major changes to their population health management benefits. Doubly robust models, adjusting for concurrent risk scores, were used to compare changes in per-member per-month (PMPM) medical costs and per-1,000-members per-year utilization between the integrated and nonintegrated groups. Propensity score matching was employed to create balanced comparison groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Members with integrated pharmacy benefits experienced a statistically significant reduction of $32.48 PMPM (7.5%) in total medical cost growth relative to the nonintegrated benefits group. This reduction was largely driven by lower inpatient ($13.27 PMPM, 13.5%) and emergency department ($1.35 PMPM, 4.7%) spending. For members with a PHMP benefit, integrated pharmacy was associated with greater estimated savings ($39.28 PMPM, 9.0%) compared with those without integrated pharmacy. Additionally, members with integrated benefits were estimated to have a greater probability (10.9%) of outreach by a PHMP nurse compared with those without integrated pharmacy.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Bundling medical and pharmacy benefits was associated with reduced medical cost growth, particularly in inpatient and outpatient settings. Coordination activities like PHMPs, enabled by data integration from bundled benefits, may be a key mechanism for achieving cost savings. These results support the consideration of benefit integration strategies for employers seeking to optimize health care spending and improve care management.</p>","PeriodicalId":16170,"journal":{"name":"Journal of managed care & specialty pharmacy","volume":"32 8","pages":"945-954"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13403259/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of managed care & specialty pharmacy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18553/jmcp.2026.32.8.945","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Employers are increasingly seeking strategies to manage rising health care costs, including bundling or carving out specific benefits like pharmacy coverage. Although some studies suggest that integrating medical and pharmacy benefits leads to reduced medical costs, the mechanism remains unclear.

Objective: To evaluate the impact of bundling medical and pharmacy benefits on medical costs and utilization among self-funded employer groups and explore the potential role of population health management programs (PHMPs) as a mechanism for driving savings.

Methods: This retrospective, propensity score-matched, longitudinal cohort analysis used administrative claims data from a large health plan in Southeastern Pennsylvania. Self-funded group plan participants were included in the analysis if they had integrated medical and pharmacy benefits in both 2022 and 2023 (integrated group) or if they lacked integrated benefits in either year (comparison group). We additionally required that these plan participants did not experience major changes to their population health management benefits. Doubly robust models, adjusting for concurrent risk scores, were used to compare changes in per-member per-month (PMPM) medical costs and per-1,000-members per-year utilization between the integrated and nonintegrated groups. Propensity score matching was employed to create balanced comparison groups.

Results: Members with integrated pharmacy benefits experienced a statistically significant reduction of $32.48 PMPM (7.5%) in total medical cost growth relative to the nonintegrated benefits group. This reduction was largely driven by lower inpatient ($13.27 PMPM, 13.5%) and emergency department ($1.35 PMPM, 4.7%) spending. For members with a PHMP benefit, integrated pharmacy was associated with greater estimated savings ($39.28 PMPM, 9.0%) compared with those without integrated pharmacy. Additionally, members with integrated benefits were estimated to have a greater probability (10.9%) of outreach by a PHMP nurse compared with those without integrated pharmacy.

Conclusions: Bundling medical and pharmacy benefits was associated with reduced medical cost growth, particularly in inpatient and outpatient settings. Coordination activities like PHMPs, enabled by data integration from bundled benefits, may be a key mechanism for achieving cost savings. These results support the consideration of benefit integration strategies for employers seeking to optimize health care spending and improve care management.

捆绑医疗和药房福利:对医疗成本的影响。
背景:越来越多的雇主正在寻求策略来管理不断上涨的医疗成本,包括捆绑或分割特定的福利,如药房保险。尽管一些研究表明,将医疗和药房福利结合起来可以降低医疗成本,但其机制尚不清楚。目的:评价医疗和药学福利捆绑对自费雇主群体医疗成本和医疗利用的影响,并探讨人口健康管理计划(PHMPs)作为推动储蓄机制的潜在作用。方法:这项回顾性、倾向评分匹配、纵向队列分析使用了来自宾夕法尼亚州东南部一个大型健康计划的行政索赔数据。如果自费团体计划参与者在2022年和2023年都有综合医疗和药学福利(综合组),或者在任何一年都没有综合福利(对照组),则将其纳入分析。我们还要求这些计划参与者的人口健康管理福利不会发生重大变化。双稳健模型,调整并发风险评分,用于比较综合组和非综合组之间每月每个成员(PMPM)医疗费用和每年每1000名成员的使用变化。采用倾向得分匹配来创建平衡的对照组。结果:与非综合福利组相比,获得综合药房福利的成员在总医疗费用增长方面经历了统计上显著的32.48美元PMPM(7.5%)的减少。这一减少主要是由于住院(13.27美元,13.5%)和急诊科(1.35美元,4.7%)支出的减少。对于拥有PHMP福利的会员,与没有整合药房的会员相比,整合药房的估计节省更多($39.28 PMPM, 9.0%)。此外,与没有综合药房的成员相比,获得综合福利的成员估计有更大的概率(10.9%)得到PHMP护士的外展服务。结论:捆绑医疗和药房福利与降低医疗费用增长有关,特别是在住院和门诊环境中。像phmp这样的协调活动,通过捆绑收益的数据集成来实现,可能是实现成本节约的关键机制。这些结果支持雇主考虑福利整合策略,以优化医疗保健支出和改善医疗管理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of managed care & specialty pharmacy
Journal of managed care & specialty pharmacy Health Professions-Pharmacy
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
4.80%
发文量
131
期刊介绍: JMCP welcomes research studies conducted outside of the United States that are relevant to our readership. Our audience is primarily concerned with designing policies of formulary coverage, health benefit design, and pharmaceutical programs that are based on evidence from large populations of people. Studies of pharmacist interventions conducted outside the United States that have already been extensively studied within the United States and studies of small sample sizes in non-managed care environments outside of the United States (e.g., hospitals or community pharmacies) are generally of low interest to our readership. However, studies of health outcomes and costs assessed in large populations that provide evidence for formulary coverage, health benefit design, and pharmaceutical programs are of high interest to JMCP’s readership.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书