Economic value of ribociclib in early breast cancer in the United States.

IF 3.3 4区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Adam Brufsky, Sara M Tolaney, Vijayakrishna K Gadi, Xinglei Chai, Fan Yang, Weiye Chen, Wenxin Ma, Zheng-Yi Zhou, Vaidyanathan Ganapathy, Apeksha Patel, Gary Sopher, Emma Alexander, Vamsi Bollu, Louis P Garrison, Joseph A Sparano
{"title":"Economic value of ribociclib in early breast cancer in the United States.","authors":"Adam Brufsky, Sara M Tolaney, Vijayakrishna K Gadi, Xinglei Chai, Fan Yang, Weiye Chen, Wenxin Ma, Zheng-Yi Zhou, Vaidyanathan Ganapathy, Apeksha Patel, Gary Sopher, Emma Alexander, Vamsi Bollu, Louis P Garrison, Joseph A Sparano","doi":"10.18553/jmcp.2026.32.8.911","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Many patients with hormone receptor-positive/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (HR+/HER2-) early breast cancer (eBC) experience recurrence despite treatment with adjuvant endocrine therapy; recurrences bear a substantial cost and can impact life expectancy and quality of life.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To estimate the lifetime clinical and economic value of ribociclib for the treatment of patients with HR+/HER2- stage II/III eBC at high risk of recurrence including select node-negative and all node-positive patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A 4-state Markov model comparing ribociclib+nonsteroidal aromatase inhibitor (NSAI) with NSAI alone estimated the expected lifetime costs and effectiveness for patients with eBC (mean age = 53 years). High risk of recurrence in HR+/HER2- eBC was based on the NATALEE trial criteria: all node-positive and node-negative patients with tumor size larger than 5 cm or 2-5 cm with Grade 3 or Grade 2 and high genomic risk. Model outcomes included invasive disease-free survival (IDFS), locoregional recurrence (LR), distant recurrence (DR), overall survival, adjuvant treatment costs, adverse event costs, disease management costs by health state, and DR treatment costs. Patient-level IDFS for the first 4.5 years observed in the NATALEE trial was parametrically extrapolated thereafter. DR and LR progression risks and treatment utilization patterns were obtained from the literature. Model outputs included total costs, quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs), life-years (LYs), equal-value LYs (evLYs), and the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of ribociclib+NSAI vs NSAI when using IDFS as the effectiveness outcome.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Ribociclib+NSAI improved IDFS (13.08 vs 11.09 years) and reduced DR (DR state = 1.28 vs 2.35 years), generating QALY gains of 0.68 (ribociclib+NSAI = 11.45; NSAI = 10.77), LY gains of 0.69 (ribociclib+NSAI = 14.98; NSAI = 14.29), and evLY gains of 0.75 (ribociclib+NSAI = 11.52; NSAI = 10.77). Total lifetime incremental costs were $52,385 (ribociclib+NSAI = $831,433; NSAI = $779,047). The ICER was $77,448/QALY, and the probability of ribociclib+NSAI being cost-effective was 68.5% at a willingness to pay of $150,000/QALY.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Based on model estimation, ribociclib+NSAI is projected to be a cost-effective therapy in the United States vs NSAI alone by reducing the rate of high-cost metastatic recurrences and increasing QALYs.</p>","PeriodicalId":16170,"journal":{"name":"Journal of managed care & specialty pharmacy","volume":"32 8","pages":"911-922"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13403262/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of managed care & specialty pharmacy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18553/jmcp.2026.32.8.911","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Many patients with hormone receptor-positive/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (HR+/HER2-) early breast cancer (eBC) experience recurrence despite treatment with adjuvant endocrine therapy; recurrences bear a substantial cost and can impact life expectancy and quality of life.

Objective: To estimate the lifetime clinical and economic value of ribociclib for the treatment of patients with HR+/HER2- stage II/III eBC at high risk of recurrence including select node-negative and all node-positive patients.

Methods: A 4-state Markov model comparing ribociclib+nonsteroidal aromatase inhibitor (NSAI) with NSAI alone estimated the expected lifetime costs and effectiveness for patients with eBC (mean age = 53 years). High risk of recurrence in HR+/HER2- eBC was based on the NATALEE trial criteria: all node-positive and node-negative patients with tumor size larger than 5 cm or 2-5 cm with Grade 3 or Grade 2 and high genomic risk. Model outcomes included invasive disease-free survival (IDFS), locoregional recurrence (LR), distant recurrence (DR), overall survival, adjuvant treatment costs, adverse event costs, disease management costs by health state, and DR treatment costs. Patient-level IDFS for the first 4.5 years observed in the NATALEE trial was parametrically extrapolated thereafter. DR and LR progression risks and treatment utilization patterns were obtained from the literature. Model outputs included total costs, quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs), life-years (LYs), equal-value LYs (evLYs), and the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of ribociclib+NSAI vs NSAI when using IDFS as the effectiveness outcome.

Results: Ribociclib+NSAI improved IDFS (13.08 vs 11.09 years) and reduced DR (DR state = 1.28 vs 2.35 years), generating QALY gains of 0.68 (ribociclib+NSAI = 11.45; NSAI = 10.77), LY gains of 0.69 (ribociclib+NSAI = 14.98; NSAI = 14.29), and evLY gains of 0.75 (ribociclib+NSAI = 11.52; NSAI = 10.77). Total lifetime incremental costs were $52,385 (ribociclib+NSAI = $831,433; NSAI = $779,047). The ICER was $77,448/QALY, and the probability of ribociclib+NSAI being cost-effective was 68.5% at a willingness to pay of $150,000/QALY.

Conclusions: Based on model estimation, ribociclib+NSAI is projected to be a cost-effective therapy in the United States vs NSAI alone by reducing the rate of high-cost metastatic recurrences and increasing QALYs.

美国早期乳腺癌中核糖素的经济价值。
背景:许多激素受体阳性/人表皮生长因子受体2阴性(HR+/HER2-)的早期乳腺癌(eBC)患者尽管接受了辅助内分泌治疗,但仍有复发的经历;复发需要付出巨大的代价,并可能影响预期寿命和生活质量。目的:评估ribociclib治疗高复发风险的HR+/HER2- II/III期eBC患者(包括部分淋巴结阴性和所有淋巴结阳性患者)的终身临床和经济价值。方法:采用四态马尔可夫模型,比较核昔利布+非甾体芳香酶抑制剂(NSAI)与单独使用NSAI,估计eBC患者(平均年龄= 53岁)的预期终生成本和有效性。HR+/HER2- eBC的高复发风险基于NATALEE试验标准:所有淋巴结阳性和淋巴结阴性患者,肿瘤大小大于5 cm或2-5 cm, 3级或2级,高基因组风险。模型结果包括侵袭性无病生存期(IDFS)、局部复发(LR)、远处复发(DR)、总生存期、辅助治疗成本、不良事件成本、按健康状态划分的疾病管理成本和DR治疗成本。在NATALEE试验中观察到的前4.5年患者水平的IDFS是此后参数外推的。从文献中获得DR和LR进展风险和治疗利用模式。当使用IDFS作为有效性结果时,模型输出包括总成本、质量调整生命年(QALYs)、生命年(LYs)、等值生命年(evLYs)以及ribociclib+NSAI与NSAI的增量成本-效果比(ICER)。结果:Ribociclib+NSAI改善了IDFS (13.08 vs 11.09年),降低了DR (DR状态= 1.28 vs 2.35年),QALY增益为0.68 (Ribociclib+NSAI = 11.45; NSAI = 10.77), LY增益为0.69 (Ribociclib+NSAI = 14.98; NSAI = 14.29), evLY增益为0.75 (Ribociclib+NSAI = 11.52; NSAI = 10.77)。总终生增量成本为52,385美元(ribociclib+NSAI = 831,433美元;NSAI = 779,047美元)。ICER为77,448美元/QALY,在支付意愿为150,000美元/QALY时,ribociclib+NSAI具有成本效益的概率为68.5%。结论:基于模型估计,通过降低高成本转移性复发率和提高qaly,预计ribociclib+NSAI在美国与单独使用NSAI相比是一种具有成本效益的治疗方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of managed care & specialty pharmacy
Journal of managed care & specialty pharmacy Health Professions-Pharmacy
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
4.80%
发文量
131
期刊介绍: JMCP welcomes research studies conducted outside of the United States that are relevant to our readership. Our audience is primarily concerned with designing policies of formulary coverage, health benefit design, and pharmaceutical programs that are based on evidence from large populations of people. Studies of pharmacist interventions conducted outside the United States that have already been extensively studied within the United States and studies of small sample sizes in non-managed care environments outside of the United States (e.g., hospitals or community pharmacies) are generally of low interest to our readership. However, studies of health outcomes and costs assessed in large populations that provide evidence for formulary coverage, health benefit design, and pharmaceutical programs are of high interest to JMCP’s readership.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书