Prioritizing Chemotherapy in Total Neoadjuvant Therapy Improves pCR Rate in Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer in Countries with Limited Radiotherapy Access: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

IF 2.2 Q4 ONCOLOGY
Zahra Taheri, Elaheh Emadi, Ali Mohammad Esfandiary Rad, James S Welsh, Yasaman Mohebbifar, Saeed Jalili Bazel, Alireza Noferesti, Maedeh Hamrah Siyani, Danial Fazilat-Panah, Freshte Foroughi, Pejman Porouhan, Babak PeyroShabany, Seyed Alireza Javadinia, Roham Salek
{"title":"Prioritizing Chemotherapy in Total Neoadjuvant Therapy Improves pCR Rate in Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer in Countries with Limited Radiotherapy Access: A Randomized Controlled Trial.","authors":"Zahra Taheri, Elaheh Emadi, Ali Mohammad Esfandiary Rad, James S Welsh, Yasaman Mohebbifar, Saeed Jalili Bazel, Alireza Noferesti, Maedeh Hamrah Siyani, Danial Fazilat-Panah, Freshte Foroughi, Pejman Porouhan, Babak PeyroShabany, Seyed Alireza Javadinia, Roham Salek","doi":"10.1007/s12029-026-01539-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (NCRT) for locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) is frequently delayed in resource-limited settings due to restricted access to radiotherapy. Total neoadjuvant therapy (TNT), which starts with chemotherapy, may offer a practical alternative. This randomized trial compared TNT with the conventional NCRT‑first approach.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>202 patients with LARC were randomized to receive either TNT (neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by NCRT, then surgery) or conventional treatment (NCRT followed by adjuvant chemotherapy and surgery). The primary endpoint was pathological complete response (pCR); treatment-related toxicity and overall survival (OS) were predefined secondary outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 202 patients with LARC (101 per arm) were enrolled and analyzed. The TNT group achieved a significantly higher pCR rate than the conventional group (55.4% vs. 42.57%, p = 0.023). Sphincter preservation, resection margins, and surgical complications were similar between groups. Among treatment-related toxicities, thrombocytopenia was less frequent in the TNT group (5.0% vs. 12.87%, p = 0.048), whereas dysuria was more common (15.8% vs. 5.94%, p = 0.024); other adverse events were comparable. OS remained an exploratory secondary endpoint and did not differ significantly between groups at the time of analysis (p = 0.109).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>TNT may represent a feasible and well-tolerated treatment strategy, particularly in settings where access to radiotherapy is delayed. The improvement in pCR supports its potential oncologic value; however, survival outcomes remain immature and require confirmation in larger studies with longer follow-up.</p>","PeriodicalId":15895,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Gastrointestinal Cancer","volume":"57 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Gastrointestinal Cancer","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12029-026-01539-2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (NCRT) for locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) is frequently delayed in resource-limited settings due to restricted access to radiotherapy. Total neoadjuvant therapy (TNT), which starts with chemotherapy, may offer a practical alternative. This randomized trial compared TNT with the conventional NCRT‑first approach.

Methods: 202 patients with LARC were randomized to receive either TNT (neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by NCRT, then surgery) or conventional treatment (NCRT followed by adjuvant chemotherapy and surgery). The primary endpoint was pathological complete response (pCR); treatment-related toxicity and overall survival (OS) were predefined secondary outcomes.

Results: A total of 202 patients with LARC (101 per arm) were enrolled and analyzed. The TNT group achieved a significantly higher pCR rate than the conventional group (55.4% vs. 42.57%, p = 0.023). Sphincter preservation, resection margins, and surgical complications were similar between groups. Among treatment-related toxicities, thrombocytopenia was less frequent in the TNT group (5.0% vs. 12.87%, p = 0.048), whereas dysuria was more common (15.8% vs. 5.94%, p = 0.024); other adverse events were comparable. OS remained an exploratory secondary endpoint and did not differ significantly between groups at the time of analysis (p = 0.109).

Conclusion: TNT may represent a feasible and well-tolerated treatment strategy, particularly in settings where access to radiotherapy is delayed. The improvement in pCR supports its potential oncologic value; however, survival outcomes remain immature and require confirmation in larger studies with longer follow-up.

在总新辅助治疗中优先考虑化疗可提高局部晚期直肠癌放疗受限国家的pCR率:一项随机对照试验
背景:局部晚期直肠癌(LARC)的新辅助放化疗(NCRT)在资源有限的环境中由于放疗的限制而经常延迟。从化疗开始的全新辅助治疗(TNT)可能是一种实用的替代方法。这项随机试验比较了TNT与传统的NCRT优先治疗方法。方法:将202例LARC患者随机分为TNT(新辅助化疗+ NCRT +手术)和常规治疗(NCRT +辅助化疗+手术)两组。主要终点为病理完全缓解(pCR);治疗相关毒性和总生存期(OS)是预先确定的次要结局。结果:共纳入并分析了202例LARC患者(每组101例)。TNT组的pCR率显著高于常规组(55.4% vs. 42.57%, p = 0.023)。两组间的括约肌保留、切除边缘和手术并发症相似。在治疗相关的毒性中,TNT组血小板减少较少(5.0%比12.87%,p = 0.048),而排尿困难更常见(15.8%比5.94%,p = 0.024);其他不良事件具有可比性。OS仍然是一个探索性次要终点,在分析时各组之间没有显著差异(p = 0.109)。结论:TNT可能是一种可行且耐受性良好的治疗策略,特别是在放疗延迟的情况下。pCR技术的改进支持了其潜在的肿瘤学价值;然而,生存结果仍然不成熟,需要在更大的随访研究中得到证实。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
121
期刊介绍: The Journal of Gastrointestinal Cancer is a multidisciplinary medium for the publication of novel research pertaining to cancers arising from the gastrointestinal tract.The journal is dedicated to the most rapid publication possible.The journal publishes papers in all relevant fields, emphasizing those studies that are helpful in understanding and treating cancers affecting the esophagus, stomach, liver, gallbladder and biliary tree, pancreas, small bowel, large bowel, rectum, and anus. In addition, the Journal of Gastrointestinal Cancer publishes basic and translational scientific information from studies providing insight into the etiology and progression of cancers affecting these organs. New insights are provided from diverse areas of research such as studies exploring pre-neoplastic states, risk factors, epidemiology, genetics, preclinical therapeutics, surgery, radiation therapy, novel medical therapeutics, clinical trials, and outcome studies.In addition to reports of original clinical and experimental studies, the journal also publishes: case reports, state-of-the-art reviews on topics of immediate interest or importance; invited articles analyzing particular areas of pancreatic research and knowledge; perspectives in which critical evaluation and conflicting opinions about current topics may be expressed; meeting highlights that summarize important points presented at recent meetings; abstracts of symposia and conferences; book reviews; hypotheses; Letters to the Editors; and other items of special interest, including:Complex Cases in GI Oncology:  This is a new initiative to provide a forum to review and discuss the history and management of complex and involved gastrointestinal oncology cases. The format will be similar to a teaching case conference where a case vignette is presented and is followed by a series of questions and discussion points. A brief reference list supporting the points made in discussion would be expected.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书