Prognostic Value of the Total Bilirubin-to-Albumin Ratio in Critically Ill Patients with Gastrointestinal Bleeding: A Multicentre Cohort Study.

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q3 EMERGENCY MEDICINE
Emergency Medicine International Pub Date : 2026-07-25 eCollection Date: 2026-01-01 DOI:10.1155/emmi/1396680
Xuyong Chen, Shasha Ying, Xiangshu Yuan, Lihong Lv, Xingyi Yang
{"title":"Prognostic Value of the Total Bilirubin-to-Albumin Ratio in Critically Ill Patients with Gastrointestinal Bleeding: A Multicentre Cohort Study.","authors":"Xuyong Chen, Shasha Ying, Xiangshu Yuan, Lihong Lv, Xingyi Yang","doi":"10.1155/emmi/1396680","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The total bilirubin-to-serum albumin ratio (TBAR) has been proposed as an indicator of hepatic dysfunction and systemic inflammation, yet its prognostic relevance in critically ill patients with gastrointestinal bleeding (GIB) remains unclear. This study evaluated the association between TBAR and mortality and developed a TBAR-based prognostic model.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data were extracted from the MIMIC-IV v3.1 database, with external validation using the eICU-CRD v2.0. Adult patients with GIB were included after applying predefined eligibility criteria, yielding a final cohort of 1627 individuals. The primary outcomes were 28-day all-cause mortality. Cox regression, Kaplan-Meier analyses, restricted cubic splines (RCS), ROC curves, and subgroup analyses were performed. A prediction nomogram was constructed using variables selected through the Boruta algorithm and evaluated using AUC, C-index, calibration performance, and decision curve analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Nonsurvivors exhibited markedly greater physiological instability, more severe organ dysfunction, and substantially higher TBAR levels. TBAR was independently associated with mortality across all Cox models (fully adjusted HR for 28-day mortality: 1.10, 95% CI 1.06-1.15). High TBAR was associated with more than a twofold increased risk of death. TBAR demonstrated superior discriminatory ability compared with TBIL or ALB alone and provided incremental predictive value when combined with the SOFA score. RCS analysis supported a linear dose-response association. Subgroup analyses showed no significant interactions. The final nomogram-which incorporated SOFA, APTT, TBAR, vasopressor use, CRRT, and anion gap-achieved an AUC of 0.794 and a bootstrap-corrected C-index of 0.789. External validation in the eICU cohort confirmed the robustness of the association and the strong performance of the model (AUC 0.805).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>TBAR is an independent predictor of mortality in critically ill patients with GIB. The TBAR-based nomogram demonstrates reliable discrimination and calibration and may facilitate individualized mortality risk stratification in clinical practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":11528,"journal":{"name":"Emergency Medicine International","volume":"2026 ","pages":"1396680"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13401164/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Emergency Medicine International","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/emmi/1396680","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: The total bilirubin-to-serum albumin ratio (TBAR) has been proposed as an indicator of hepatic dysfunction and systemic inflammation, yet its prognostic relevance in critically ill patients with gastrointestinal bleeding (GIB) remains unclear. This study evaluated the association between TBAR and mortality and developed a TBAR-based prognostic model.

Methods: Data were extracted from the MIMIC-IV v3.1 database, with external validation using the eICU-CRD v2.0. Adult patients with GIB were included after applying predefined eligibility criteria, yielding a final cohort of 1627 individuals. The primary outcomes were 28-day all-cause mortality. Cox regression, Kaplan-Meier analyses, restricted cubic splines (RCS), ROC curves, and subgroup analyses were performed. A prediction nomogram was constructed using variables selected through the Boruta algorithm and evaluated using AUC, C-index, calibration performance, and decision curve analysis.

Results: Nonsurvivors exhibited markedly greater physiological instability, more severe organ dysfunction, and substantially higher TBAR levels. TBAR was independently associated with mortality across all Cox models (fully adjusted HR for 28-day mortality: 1.10, 95% CI 1.06-1.15). High TBAR was associated with more than a twofold increased risk of death. TBAR demonstrated superior discriminatory ability compared with TBIL or ALB alone and provided incremental predictive value when combined with the SOFA score. RCS analysis supported a linear dose-response association. Subgroup analyses showed no significant interactions. The final nomogram-which incorporated SOFA, APTT, TBAR, vasopressor use, CRRT, and anion gap-achieved an AUC of 0.794 and a bootstrap-corrected C-index of 0.789. External validation in the eICU cohort confirmed the robustness of the association and the strong performance of the model (AUC 0.805).

Conclusions: TBAR is an independent predictor of mortality in critically ill patients with GIB. The TBAR-based nomogram demonstrates reliable discrimination and calibration and may facilitate individualized mortality risk stratification in clinical practice.

总胆红素与白蛋白比值在胃肠道出血危重患者中的预后价值:一项多中心队列研究。
总胆红素与血清白蛋白比率(TBAR)已被提出作为肝功能障碍和全身性炎症的指标,但其与胃肠道出血(GIB)危重患者预后的相关性尚不清楚。本研究评估了TBAR与死亡率之间的关系,并建立了基于TBAR的预后模型。方法:数据从MIMIC-IV v3.1数据库中提取,采用eICU-CRD v2.0进行外部验证。在应用预定义的资格标准后纳入成年GIB患者,最终产生1627人的队列。主要结局为28天全因死亡率。采用Cox回归、Kaplan-Meier分析、限制性三次样条(RCS)、ROC曲线和亚组分析。利用Boruta算法选取的变量构建预测模态图,并用AUC、C-index、校准性能和决策曲线分析对预测模态图进行评价。结果:非幸存者表现出明显更大的生理不稳定性,更严重的器官功能障碍和更高的TBAR水平。在所有Cox模型中,TBAR与死亡率独立相关(28天死亡率的完全调整HR: 1.10, 95% CI 1.06-1.15)。高TBAR与死亡风险增加两倍以上相关。与单独的TBIL或ALB相比,TBAR表现出更好的区分能力,并与SOFA评分结合时提供了增加的预测价值。RCS分析支持线性剂量-反应关联。亚组分析显示无显著的相互作用。最终的nomogram包括SOFA、APTT、TBAR、血管加压剂使用、CRRT和阴离子间隙,AUC为0.794,bootstrap校正的C-index为0.789。eICU队列的外部验证证实了该关联的稳健性和模型的强大性能(AUC为0.805)。结论:TBAR是GIB危重患者死亡率的独立预测因子。基于tbar的nomogram显示了可靠的区分和校准,并可能在临床实践中促进个体化死亡风险分层。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Emergency Medicine International
Emergency Medicine International EMERGENCY MEDICINE-
CiteScore
0.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
187
审稿时长
17 weeks
期刊介绍: Emergency Medicine International is a peer-reviewed, Open Access journal that provides a forum for doctors, nurses, paramedics and ambulance staff. The journal publishes original research articles, review articles, and clinical studies related to prehospital care, disaster preparedness and response, acute medical and paediatric emergencies, critical care, sports medicine, wound care, and toxicology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书