Profiling the pattern of medication use during pregnancy: an international scoping review of observational studies.

IF 3.6 3区 医学 Q2 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Irin Parvin, Hanan Abunimeh, Hisham Alshammari, Amanj Kurdi, Marion Bennie, Tanja Mueller
{"title":"Profiling the pattern of medication use during pregnancy: an international scoping review of observational studies.","authors":"Irin Parvin, Hanan Abunimeh, Hisham Alshammari, Amanj Kurdi, Marion Bennie, Tanja Mueller","doi":"10.1080/17512433.2026.2710151","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Medication use during pregnancy has increased significantly worldwide. However, detailed evidence on prescribing patterns during pregnancy remains limited. This scoping review aimed to summarize and provide a comprehensive global overview of the patterns/types of medications used during pregnancy.</p><p><strong>Areas covered: </strong>The Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) methodology was followed. PubMed, Ovid MEDLINE, Scopus, Web of Science, and EMBASE were searched for population-based and large multicentre observational studies published between January 2010 and April 2024. The included studies focused on pregnant women, investigated and quantified medications use during pregnancy. Identified medications were summarized narratively using the Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical (ATC) and the United States Food and Drug Administration (US-FDA)/Australian Therapeutic Goods Administration (AU-TGA) risk classification systems, and stratified by trimesters.</p><p><strong>Expert opinion: </strong>Of 7,552 studies, 83 were eligible. The most frequently reported ATC categories were alimentary tract and metabolism (A, 0-96%), blood and blood-forming organs (B, 0-84.5%), nervous system (N, 0-73.3%), anti-infectives (J, 0-56%), and respiratory system (R, 0-51.3%). However, limited research provided trimester-specific information. Additionally, risk category A exhibited the widest prevalence range, 0-73.1%, while the higher-risk categories, D and X, were at 0-22.6% and 0-8.3%, respectively. This review highlights the need for further trimester-specific studies.</p>","PeriodicalId":12207,"journal":{"name":"Expert Review of Clinical Pharmacology","volume":" ","pages":"729-747"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Expert Review of Clinical Pharmacology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17512433.2026.2710151","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/8/3 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Medication use during pregnancy has increased significantly worldwide. However, detailed evidence on prescribing patterns during pregnancy remains limited. This scoping review aimed to summarize and provide a comprehensive global overview of the patterns/types of medications used during pregnancy.

Areas covered: The Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) methodology was followed. PubMed, Ovid MEDLINE, Scopus, Web of Science, and EMBASE were searched for population-based and large multicentre observational studies published between January 2010 and April 2024. The included studies focused on pregnant women, investigated and quantified medications use during pregnancy. Identified medications were summarized narratively using the Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical (ATC) and the United States Food and Drug Administration (US-FDA)/Australian Therapeutic Goods Administration (AU-TGA) risk classification systems, and stratified by trimesters.

Expert opinion: Of 7,552 studies, 83 were eligible. The most frequently reported ATC categories were alimentary tract and metabolism (A, 0-96%), blood and blood-forming organs (B, 0-84.5%), nervous system (N, 0-73.3%), anti-infectives (J, 0-56%), and respiratory system (R, 0-51.3%). However, limited research provided trimester-specific information. Additionally, risk category A exhibited the widest prevalence range, 0-73.1%, while the higher-risk categories, D and X, were at 0-22.6% and 0-8.3%, respectively. This review highlights the need for further trimester-specific studies.

分析妊娠期间药物使用模式:一项观察性研究的国际范围审查。
在世界范围内,怀孕期间的药物使用显著增加。然而,关于怀孕期间处方模式的详细证据仍然有限。本综述旨在总结和提供妊娠期间使用的药物模式/类型的全面全球概述。涵盖的领域:遵循乔安娜布里格斯研究所(JBI)的方法。检索了PubMed、Ovid MEDLINE、Scopus、Web of Science和EMBASE,检索了2010年1月至2024年4月间发表的基于人群的大型多中心观察性研究。纳入的研究集中在孕妇身上,调查并量化了怀孕期间的药物使用情况。使用解剖治疗化学(ATC)和美国食品和药物管理局(US-FDA)/澳大利亚治疗用品管理局(AU-TGA)风险分类系统对确定的药物进行叙述总结,并按妊娠期分层。专家意见:在7552项研究中,有83项符合条件。最常报道的ATC分类是消化道和代谢(A, 0-96%)、血液和造血器官(B, 0-84.5%)、神经系统(N, 0-73.3%)、抗感染(J, 0-56%)和呼吸系统(R, 0-51.3%)。然而,有限的研究提供了妊娠期特异性信息。此外,风险类别A的患病率范围最大,为0-73.1%,而高风险类别D和X的患病率分别为0-22.6%和0-8.3%。这篇综述强调了进一步的孕期特异性研究的必要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Expert Review of Clinical Pharmacology
Expert Review of Clinical Pharmacology PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY-
CiteScore
7.30
自引率
2.30%
发文量
127
期刊介绍: Advances in drug development technologies are yielding innovative new therapies, from potentially lifesaving medicines to lifestyle products. In recent years, however, the cost of developing new drugs has soared, and concerns over drug resistance and pharmacoeconomics have come to the fore. Adverse reactions experienced at the clinical trial level serve as a constant reminder of the importance of rigorous safety and toxicity testing. Furthermore the advent of pharmacogenomics and ‘individualized’ approaches to therapy will demand a fresh approach to drug evaluation and healthcare delivery. Clinical Pharmacology provides an essential role in integrating the expertise of all of the specialists and players who are active in meeting such challenges in modern biomedical practice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书