Diagnostic Performance of Artificial Intelligence (AI) Chatbot Compared to Orthopedic Trauma Surgeons in Evaluating Indication for Surgery for Isolated Lateral Malleolar Fractures: a Retrospective Study.

IF 0.6 4区 医学 Q4 ORTHOPEDICS
Maria Oulianski, Rami Mosheiff, Dana Avraham, Omer Ben Yehuda, Yoram Weil, Mahmoud Jammal
{"title":"Diagnostic Performance of Artificial Intelligence (AI) Chatbot Compared to Orthopedic Trauma Surgeons in Evaluating Indication for Surgery for Isolated Lateral Malleolar Fractures: a Retrospective Study.","authors":"Maria Oulianski, Rami Mosheiff, Dana Avraham, Omer Ben Yehuda, Yoram Weil, Mahmoud Jammal","doi":"10.55095/achot2026/027","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose of the study: </strong>The indication for surgery for isolated lateral malleolar fracture (AO/OTA 44B1) is debatable and in many cases, relies upon radiographic assessment of fracture stability. Artificial intelligence chatbots with visual analysis capabilities offer a potential attribute for radiographic assessment. This study compared the diagnostic performance of a commercially available AI chatbot with that of three fellowship-trained orthopedic trauma surgeons in evaluating equivocal isolated lateral malleolar fractures.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>A retrospective study. 50 patients with isolated lateral malleolar injury at the level of the syndesmosis (AO/OTA 44B1) were evaluated by three blinded fellowship-trained orthopedic trauma surgeons. Each rater measured standardized radiographic ankle parameters, medial clear space, tibiofibular clear space, and tibiofibular overlap, on anteroposterior and mortise views and determined a surgical versus nonoperative treatment recommendation. Subsequently, the same sets of radiographs were independently evaluated by an AI chatbot (Claude, Anthropic). The observers and AI decisions were compared to the actual outcome of the patients (operative vs. nonoperatives).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>All raters recommended surgery at lower rates (34.0-46.0%) than the actual operative rate (56.0%). The difference in outcomes between the actual treatment and the observers varied and ranged between 67.3-86% with the AI within the same ranges. The AI's radiographic measurements differed systematically from all surgeons across five of six parameters. Inter-rater agreement between the AI and surgeons was slight, while inter-surgeon agreement was moderate (κ = 0.457-0.589). ROC analysis showed comparable AUC values (0.63-0.67) for all raters.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>The AI chatbot demonstrated diagnostic accuracy comparable to orthopedic trauma surgeons in directing treatment for isolated lateral malleolar fractures, despite using a systematically different measurement strategy. All raters exhibited conservative bias as comparted with the actual outcome with modest discriminatory ability, reflecting the inherent difficulty of this clinical issue. These findings support a potential complementary role for AI in ankle fracture triage, while final clinical management decisions should remain in the hands of the orthopedic surgeon.</p>","PeriodicalId":6980,"journal":{"name":"Acta chirurgiae orthopaedicae et traumatologiae Cechoslovaca","volume":"93 3","pages":"133-139"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta chirurgiae orthopaedicae et traumatologiae Cechoslovaca","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.55095/achot2026/027","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose of the study: The indication for surgery for isolated lateral malleolar fracture (AO/OTA 44B1) is debatable and in many cases, relies upon radiographic assessment of fracture stability. Artificial intelligence chatbots with visual analysis capabilities offer a potential attribute for radiographic assessment. This study compared the diagnostic performance of a commercially available AI chatbot with that of three fellowship-trained orthopedic trauma surgeons in evaluating equivocal isolated lateral malleolar fractures.

Material and methods: A retrospective study. 50 patients with isolated lateral malleolar injury at the level of the syndesmosis (AO/OTA 44B1) were evaluated by three blinded fellowship-trained orthopedic trauma surgeons. Each rater measured standardized radiographic ankle parameters, medial clear space, tibiofibular clear space, and tibiofibular overlap, on anteroposterior and mortise views and determined a surgical versus nonoperative treatment recommendation. Subsequently, the same sets of radiographs were independently evaluated by an AI chatbot (Claude, Anthropic). The observers and AI decisions were compared to the actual outcome of the patients (operative vs. nonoperatives).

Results: All raters recommended surgery at lower rates (34.0-46.0%) than the actual operative rate (56.0%). The difference in outcomes between the actual treatment and the observers varied and ranged between 67.3-86% with the AI within the same ranges. The AI's radiographic measurements differed systematically from all surgeons across five of six parameters. Inter-rater agreement between the AI and surgeons was slight, while inter-surgeon agreement was moderate (κ = 0.457-0.589). ROC analysis showed comparable AUC values (0.63-0.67) for all raters.

Discussion: The AI chatbot demonstrated diagnostic accuracy comparable to orthopedic trauma surgeons in directing treatment for isolated lateral malleolar fractures, despite using a systematically different measurement strategy. All raters exhibited conservative bias as comparted with the actual outcome with modest discriminatory ability, reflecting the inherent difficulty of this clinical issue. These findings support a potential complementary role for AI in ankle fracture triage, while final clinical management decisions should remain in the hands of the orthopedic surgeon.

人工智能(AI)聊天机器人与骨科创伤外科医生在评估孤立外踝骨折手术指征方面的诊断性能:一项回顾性研究。
研究目的:孤立性外踝骨折(AO/OTA 44B1)的手术指征是有争议的,在许多情况下,手术指征依赖于骨折稳定性的影像学评估。具有视觉分析能力的人工智能聊天机器人为放射评估提供了潜在的属性。本研究比较了市售人工智能聊天机器人与三位接受过培训的骨科创伤外科医生在评估模棱两可的孤立性外踝骨折方面的诊断性能。材料与方法:回顾性研究。50例孤立外踝联合水平损伤(AO/OTA 44B1)的患者由三位盲法研究培训的骨科创伤外科医生进行评估。每个评分者都测量了标准化的踝关节x线片参数、内侧间隙、胫腓骨间隙和胫腓骨重叠,在正位和正位视图上,并确定了手术与非手术治疗的建议。随后,AI聊天机器人(Claude, Anthropic)对同一组x光片进行独立评估。将观察员和人工智能决策与患者的实际结果(手术与非手术)进行比较。结果:所有评分者推荐手术率(34.0 ~ 46.0%)均低于实际手术率(56.0%)。实际治疗组和观察组之间的结果差异在67.3-86%之间,而人工智能在相同的范围内。人工智能的放射测量在六个参数中的五个参数上与所有外科医生有系统的不同。人工智能与外科医生之间的评分一致性较低,而外科医生之间的评分一致性中等(κ = 0.457-0.589)。ROC分析显示所有评分者的AUC值相当(0.63-0.67)。讨论:人工智能聊天机器人在指导孤立外踝骨折治疗方面的诊断准确性与骨科创伤外科医生相当,尽管使用了系统不同的测量策略。与实际结果相比,所有评分者都表现出保守偏差,具有适度的区分能力,反映了该临床问题的固有难度。这些发现支持人工智能在踝关节骨折分诊中的潜在补充作用,而最终的临床管理决策仍应掌握在骨科医生手中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
25.00%
发文量
53
期刊介绍: Editorial Board accepts for publication articles, reports from congresses, fellowships, book reviews, reports concerning activities of orthopaedic and other relating specialised societies, reports on anniversaries of outstanding personalities in orthopaedics and announcements of congresses and symposia being prepared. Articles include original papers, case reports and current concepts reviews and recently also instructional lectures.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书