A neural network model of free recall learns multiple memory strategies

IF 29.8 1区 计算机科学 Q1 COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE
Moufan Li, Kristopher T. Jensen, Qiong Zhang, Qihong Lu, Marcelo G. Mattar
{"title":"A neural network model of free recall learns multiple memory strategies","authors":"Moufan Li, Kristopher T. Jensen, Qiong Zhang, Qihong Lu, Marcelo G. Mattar","doi":"10.1038/s42256-026-01274-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Humans exhibit structured patterns of memory recall, including a tendency to recall more recent information and to recall events in the same order they were experienced. Classic computational models explain these patterns by positing that memories incorporate the ongoing ‘temporal context’, formed by smoothly integrating the stimulus history. However, it is unclear whether a single mechanism can account for the full repertoire of human memory strategies, and if this posited mechanism is optimal for recall performance. For example, human memory experts widely apply the ‘memory palace’ strategy, which is empirically better but not captured by temporal context models. Here we show that neural networks optimized for free recall develop diverse retrieval strategies, with only some of them resembling temporal context models. The best-performing models discovered a stimulus-invariant index code that emphasizes the studied position of each list item, instead of its temporal context. This creates a stable scaffold for forward recall akin to the memory palace technique. This index code was more likely to emerge when networks were (1) encouraged to recall all studied items rather than prioritizing only the next few items, and (2) prevented from relying on recency. Our findings demonstrate that human-like recall patterns can arise from multiple distinct computational mechanisms, and that sequential retrieval using item index is an optimal strategy that explains expert-level recall performance. Li et al. show that recurrent neural networks optimized for free recall discover diverse, human-like memory strategies beyond classical temporal context models, with top models using an index-based mechanism resembling the memory palace technique.","PeriodicalId":48533,"journal":{"name":"Nature Machine Intelligence","volume":"8 8","pages":"1238-1250"},"PeriodicalIF":29.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nature Machine Intelligence","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://www.nature.com/articles/s42256-026-01274-0","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Humans exhibit structured patterns of memory recall, including a tendency to recall more recent information and to recall events in the same order they were experienced. Classic computational models explain these patterns by positing that memories incorporate the ongoing ‘temporal context’, formed by smoothly integrating the stimulus history. However, it is unclear whether a single mechanism can account for the full repertoire of human memory strategies, and if this posited mechanism is optimal for recall performance. For example, human memory experts widely apply the ‘memory palace’ strategy, which is empirically better but not captured by temporal context models. Here we show that neural networks optimized for free recall develop diverse retrieval strategies, with only some of them resembling temporal context models. The best-performing models discovered a stimulus-invariant index code that emphasizes the studied position of each list item, instead of its temporal context. This creates a stable scaffold for forward recall akin to the memory palace technique. This index code was more likely to emerge when networks were (1) encouraged to recall all studied items rather than prioritizing only the next few items, and (2) prevented from relying on recency. Our findings demonstrate that human-like recall patterns can arise from multiple distinct computational mechanisms, and that sequential retrieval using item index is an optimal strategy that explains expert-level recall performance. Li et al. show that recurrent neural networks optimized for free recall discover diverse, human-like memory strategies beyond classical temporal context models, with top models using an index-based mechanism resembling the memory palace technique.
自由回忆的神经网络模型学习多种记忆策略
人类表现出结构化的记忆回忆模式,包括倾向于回忆最近的信息,并按照他们经历的相同顺序回忆事件。经典的计算模型通过假设记忆包含持续的“时间背景”来解释这些模式,这些背景是通过平滑地整合刺激历史而形成的。然而,目前尚不清楚单一的机制是否可以解释人类记忆策略的全部功能,以及这种假设的机制是否对回忆性能是最佳的。例如,人类记忆专家广泛应用“记忆宫殿”策略,这种策略在经验上更好,但没有被时间上下文模型捕获。本文表明,针对自由回忆进行优化的神经网络开发了多种检索策略,其中只有一些类似于时间上下文模型。表现最好的模型发现了一个刺激不变索引代码,它强调每个列表项的研究位置,而不是其时间上下文。这为向前回忆创造了一个稳定的支架,类似于记忆宫殿技术。当网络(1)被鼓励回忆所有研究过的项目,而不是只优先考虑接下来的几个项目,以及(2)防止依赖近因时,这个索引代码更有可能出现。我们的研究结果表明,类似人类的回忆模式可以由多种不同的计算机制产生,使用项目索引的顺序检索是解释专家级回忆性能的最佳策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
36.90
自引率
2.10%
发文量
127
期刊介绍: Nature Machine Intelligence is a distinguished publication that presents original research and reviews on various topics in machine learning, robotics, and AI. Our focus extends beyond these fields, exploring their profound impact on other scientific disciplines, as well as societal and industrial aspects. We recognize limitless possibilities wherein machine intelligence can augment human capabilities and knowledge in domains like scientific exploration, healthcare, medical diagnostics, and the creation of safe and sustainable cities, transportation, and agriculture. Simultaneously, we acknowledge the emergence of ethical, social, and legal concerns due to the rapid pace of advancements. To foster interdisciplinary discussions on these far-reaching implications, Nature Machine Intelligence serves as a platform for dialogue facilitated through Comments, News Features, News & Views articles, and Correspondence. Our goal is to encourage a comprehensive examination of these subjects. Similar to all Nature-branded journals, Nature Machine Intelligence operates under the guidance of a team of skilled editors. We adhere to a fair and rigorous peer-review process, ensuring high standards of copy-editing and production, swift publication, and editorial independence.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书