Teaching Systems Thinking in Postgraduate Public Health: A Scoping Review of Curricular Approaches

IF 2 4区 医学 Q3 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Gareth Durrant
{"title":"Teaching Systems Thinking in Postgraduate Public Health: A Scoping Review of Curricular Approaches","authors":"Gareth Durrant","doi":"10.1002/hpja.70220","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Issue Addressed</h3>\n \n <p>Public health professionals need systems-thinking capabilities to address complex health challenges. Systems thinking is increasingly recognised in public health competency frameworks, yet published literature on how it is taught in postgraduate programmes remains limited. This scoping review mapped descriptions of its teaching in that literature.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>A search of PubMed, Education Resources Information Center (ERIC) and Web of Science was conducted on 15 May 2025 using terms related to public health education and systems thinking. Sources were eligible if they described postgraduate public health programmes with explicit systems thinking content. After screening 1471 records and assessing 32 full texts, 14 sources were included. Data were charted by programme characteristics, systems-thinking focus, pedagogy, tools, assessments and challenges and then analysed using inductive thematic synthesis.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Programmes were mostly in the United States (7/14). Other examples came from Europe, Canada and Australia. None were from Asia or Africa. Most programmes (11/14) used explicit systems-thinking tools, particularly visual techniques. Approaches and integration depth varied. The review organised reported practices into six review-derived curricular patterns: applied practice, student leadership, research and inquiry, active learning, creative production and reflective practices.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>Systems thinking was taught in varied ways. Six recurring curricular approaches were developed as review-derived organising categories.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> So What?</h3>\n \n <p>This review provides a descriptive menu of reported approaches that may inform curriculum design, faculty development and future evaluation of systems thinking pedagogy in postgraduate public health.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":47379,"journal":{"name":"Health Promotion Journal of Australia","volume":"37 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Promotion Journal of Australia","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/hpja.70220","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Issue Addressed

Public health professionals need systems-thinking capabilities to address complex health challenges. Systems thinking is increasingly recognised in public health competency frameworks, yet published literature on how it is taught in postgraduate programmes remains limited. This scoping review mapped descriptions of its teaching in that literature.

Methods

A search of PubMed, Education Resources Information Center (ERIC) and Web of Science was conducted on 15 May 2025 using terms related to public health education and systems thinking. Sources were eligible if they described postgraduate public health programmes with explicit systems thinking content. After screening 1471 records and assessing 32 full texts, 14 sources were included. Data were charted by programme characteristics, systems-thinking focus, pedagogy, tools, assessments and challenges and then analysed using inductive thematic synthesis.

Results

Programmes were mostly in the United States (7/14). Other examples came from Europe, Canada and Australia. None were from Asia or Africa. Most programmes (11/14) used explicit systems-thinking tools, particularly visual techniques. Approaches and integration depth varied. The review organised reported practices into six review-derived curricular patterns: applied practice, student leadership, research and inquiry, active learning, creative production and reflective practices.

Conclusions

Systems thinking was taught in varied ways. Six recurring curricular approaches were developed as review-derived organising categories.

So What?

This review provides a descriptive menu of reported approaches that may inform curriculum design, faculty development and future evaluation of systems thinking pedagogy in postgraduate public health.

研究生公共卫生教学系统思维:课程方法的范围回顾
所处理的问题:公共卫生专业人员需要系统思维能力来应对复杂的卫生挑战。系统思维在公共卫生能力框架中得到越来越多的认可,然而关于如何在研究生课程中教授系统思维的已发表文献仍然有限。这个范围审查映射了该文献中对其教学的描述。方法:于2025年5月15日检索PubMed、教育资源信息中心(ERIC)和Web of Science,检索与公共卫生教育和系统思维相关的术语。如果资料来源描述的研究生公共卫生课程具有明确的系统思维内容,则符合条件。在筛选了1471份记录并评估了32份全文后,纳入了14个来源。数据按项目特点、系统思维重点、教学法、工具、评估和挑战绘制图表,然后使用归纳主题综合法进行分析。结果:项目主要在美国(7/14)。其他例子来自欧洲、加拿大和澳大利亚。没有人来自亚洲或非洲。大多数课程(11/14)使用了明确的系统思考工具,特别是视觉技术。方法和整合深度各不相同。该评估将报告的实践分为六种基于评估的课程模式:应用实践、学生领导、研究与探究、主动学习、创造性生产和反思实践。结论:系统思维的教学方式多种多样。六种重复的课程方法被开发为审查衍生的组织类别。那又怎样?本综述提供了一份描述性的报告方法菜单,可以为研究生公共卫生系统思维教学法的课程设计、师资发展和未来评估提供信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Health Promotion Journal of Australia
Health Promotion Journal of Australia PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
10.50%
发文量
115
期刊介绍: The purpose of the Health Promotion Journal of Australia is to facilitate communication between researchers, practitioners, and policymakers involved in health promotion activities. Preference for publication is given to practical examples of policies, theories, strategies and programs which utilise educational, organisational, economic and/or environmental approaches to health promotion. The journal also publishes brief reports discussing programs, professional viewpoints, and guidelines for practice or evaluation methodology. The journal features articles, brief reports, editorials, perspectives, "of interest", viewpoints, book reviews and letters.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书