Arthroscopic Partial Repair and Arthroscopic Debridement Improve Pain and Functional Outcomes in Older Patients With Massive Irreparable Rotator Cuff Tears: A Systematic Review.
Dave Osinachukwu Duru, Andrew Kailin Zhou, Rahul Geetala, Andrew Metcalfe, Salma Chaudhury
{"title":"Arthroscopic Partial Repair and Arthroscopic Debridement Improve Pain and Functional Outcomes in Older Patients With Massive Irreparable Rotator Cuff Tears: A Systematic Review.","authors":"Dave Osinachukwu Duru, Andrew Kailin Zhou, Rahul Geetala, Andrew Metcalfe, Salma Chaudhury","doi":"10.1002/ars2.70030","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To evaluate the current evidence on patient-reported outcomes and complications after arthroscopic partial repair and arthroscopic debridement for massive irreparable rotator cuff tears (MIRCTs) in patients aged 65 years or older.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic search of MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases was conducted through September 2025 according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. Eligible studies included randomized controlled trials, cohort studies, and case series (>10 patients) reporting outcomes of arthroscopic partial repair or debridement in patients aged ≥65 years with minimum 12-month follow-up. Two reviewers independently extracted data and assessed study quality using Cochrane Risk of Bias 2.0 (RoB 2.0) and Risk Of Bias In Nonrandomized Studies of Interventions (ROBINS-I) tools.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty-six studies (n = 942 patients) were included. Both interventions led to clinically meaningful improvements in pain and function. Mean visual analog scale pain score improvements ranged from 2.0 to 5.8 with partial repair and 4.0 to 6.5 with debridement. Mean Constant-Murley score gains ranged from 15.0 to 33.6 with partial repair and 16.4 to 31.4 with debridement. Retear rates after partial repair were high (41.7%-87.3%) but not consistently associated with worse outcomes. Rates of infection and conversion to reverse shoulder arthroplasty were low across both interventions.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Arthroscopic partial repair and arthroscopic debridement are both effective joint-preserving options for managing massive irreparable rotator cuff tears in older patients, resulting in significant improvements in pain and function, with low complication rates.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>Level IV, systematic review of Level I to IV studies.</p>","PeriodicalId":34631,"journal":{"name":"Arthroscopy Sports Medicine and Rehabilitation","volume":" ","pages":"e70030"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13399890/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Arthroscopy Sports Medicine and Rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/ars2.70030","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/8/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Purpose: To evaluate the current evidence on patient-reported outcomes and complications after arthroscopic partial repair and arthroscopic debridement for massive irreparable rotator cuff tears (MIRCTs) in patients aged 65 years or older.
Methods: A systematic search of MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases was conducted through September 2025 according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. Eligible studies included randomized controlled trials, cohort studies, and case series (>10 patients) reporting outcomes of arthroscopic partial repair or debridement in patients aged ≥65 years with minimum 12-month follow-up. Two reviewers independently extracted data and assessed study quality using Cochrane Risk of Bias 2.0 (RoB 2.0) and Risk Of Bias In Nonrandomized Studies of Interventions (ROBINS-I) tools.
Results: Twenty-six studies (n = 942 patients) were included. Both interventions led to clinically meaningful improvements in pain and function. Mean visual analog scale pain score improvements ranged from 2.0 to 5.8 with partial repair and 4.0 to 6.5 with debridement. Mean Constant-Murley score gains ranged from 15.0 to 33.6 with partial repair and 16.4 to 31.4 with debridement. Retear rates after partial repair were high (41.7%-87.3%) but not consistently associated with worse outcomes. Rates of infection and conversion to reverse shoulder arthroplasty were low across both interventions.
Conclusions: Arthroscopic partial repair and arthroscopic debridement are both effective joint-preserving options for managing massive irreparable rotator cuff tears in older patients, resulting in significant improvements in pain and function, with low complication rates.
Level of evidence: Level IV, systematic review of Level I to IV studies.
目的:评估65岁及以上患者在关节镜下部分修复和关节镜下清创治疗大量不可修复的肩袖撕裂(mirct)后患者报告的结果和并发症。方法:根据系统评价和荟萃分析指南的首选报告项目,在2025年9月之前对MEDLINE、Embase和Cochrane图书馆数据库进行系统检索。符合条件的研究包括随机对照试验、队列研究和病例系列(bbb10例患者),报告≥65岁患者关节镜部分修复或清创的结果,随访时间至少为12个月。两位审稿人独立提取数据并使用Cochrane Risk of Bias 2.0 (RoB 2.0)和Risk of Bias In non - random Studies of Interventions (ROBINS-I)工具评估研究质量。结果:纳入26项研究(n = 942例患者)。这两种干预措施都对疼痛和功能有临床意义的改善。平均视觉模拟疼痛评分改善范围为部分修复组2.0 - 5.8分,清创组4.0 - 6.5分。部分修复组的平均Constant-Murley评分增加15.0 - 33.6,清创组的平均Constant-Murley评分增加16.4 - 31.4。部分修复后的复发率很高(41.7%-87.3%),但并不总是与较差的结果相关。在两种干预措施中,感染和转到反向肩关节置换术的发生率都很低。结论:关节镜下部分修复和关节镜下清创都是治疗老年患者大量不可修复的肩袖撕裂的有效保关节选择,可显著改善疼痛和功能,并发症发生率低。证据等级:四级,对一级至四级研究的系统评价。