Dexmedetomidine versus magnesium sulphate as adjuvants to ropivacaine in ilioinguinal-iliohypogastric nerve block for inguinal hernia repair: A randomised controlled trial.

IF 2.2 Q1 ANESTHESIOLOGY
Indian Journal of Anaesthesia Pub Date : 2026-07-01 Epub Date: 2026-07-21 DOI:10.4103/ija.ija_457_26
Laxman K Senapati, Reddi Gireesh Bodigandla, Amit Pradhan, Rajendra K Sahoo, Priyadarsini Samanta
{"title":"Dexmedetomidine versus magnesium sulphate as adjuvants to ropivacaine in ilioinguinal-iliohypogastric nerve block for inguinal hernia repair: A randomised controlled trial.","authors":"Laxman K Senapati, Reddi Gireesh Bodigandla, Amit Pradhan, Rajendra K Sahoo, Priyadarsini Samanta","doi":"10.4103/ija.ija_457_26","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and aims: </strong>Ultrasound-guided ilioinguinal-iliohypogastric nerve block (II-IHNB) provides effective analgesia for inguinal hernia surgery; however, the duration of analgesia with local anaesthetic alone is limited. This study compared dexmedetomidine and magnesium sulphate as adjuvants to ropivacaine for II-IHNB.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this randomised controlled trial, 120 patients were allocated into three groups (<i>n</i> = 40 each). Group A received 0.5% ropivacaine, group B received ropivacaine with magnesium sulphate (5 mg/kg), and group C received ropivacaine with dexmedetomidine (1 µg/kg). The primary outcome was time to first rescue analgesia. Secondary outcomes included visual analogue scale (VAS) scores, 24-hour opioid consumption, sedation, haemodynamic parameters, and adverse events.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The time to first rescue analgesia was significantly longer in group C than in group A, with a median difference of 1080 min [95% confidence interval (CI): 923-1125 min; <i>P</i> < 0.001]. The total 24-hour opioid consumption was significantly lower in group C than in group A, with a median difference of - 10 morphine milligram equivalents (95% CI: -15 to - 5; <i>P</i> < 0.001). VAS scores at rest and movement were significantly lower in group C at multiple postoperative time points (<i>P</i> < 0.001). Sedation scores were higher in group C in the immediate postoperative period (<i>P</i> < 0.001), but no clinically significant respiratory depression occurred. Haemodynamic parameters and the incidence of adverse events remained comparable across groups (<i>P</i> > 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Dexmedetomidine is superior to magnesium sulphate as an adjuvant to ropivacaine in II-IHNB, providing prolonged analgesia, reduced opioid consumption, and stable haemodynamics with an acceptable sedation profile.</p>","PeriodicalId":13339,"journal":{"name":"Indian Journal of Anaesthesia","volume":"70 7","pages":"806-813"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13399270/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indian Journal of Anaesthesia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/ija.ija_457_26","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/7/21 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and aims: Ultrasound-guided ilioinguinal-iliohypogastric nerve block (II-IHNB) provides effective analgesia for inguinal hernia surgery; however, the duration of analgesia with local anaesthetic alone is limited. This study compared dexmedetomidine and magnesium sulphate as adjuvants to ropivacaine for II-IHNB.

Methods: In this randomised controlled trial, 120 patients were allocated into three groups (n = 40 each). Group A received 0.5% ropivacaine, group B received ropivacaine with magnesium sulphate (5 mg/kg), and group C received ropivacaine with dexmedetomidine (1 µg/kg). The primary outcome was time to first rescue analgesia. Secondary outcomes included visual analogue scale (VAS) scores, 24-hour opioid consumption, sedation, haemodynamic parameters, and adverse events.

Results: The time to first rescue analgesia was significantly longer in group C than in group A, with a median difference of 1080 min [95% confidence interval (CI): 923-1125 min; P < 0.001]. The total 24-hour opioid consumption was significantly lower in group C than in group A, with a median difference of - 10 morphine milligram equivalents (95% CI: -15 to - 5; P < 0.001). VAS scores at rest and movement were significantly lower in group C at multiple postoperative time points (P < 0.001). Sedation scores were higher in group C in the immediate postoperative period (P < 0.001), but no clinically significant respiratory depression occurred. Haemodynamic parameters and the incidence of adverse events remained comparable across groups (P > 0.05).

Conclusion: Dexmedetomidine is superior to magnesium sulphate as an adjuvant to ropivacaine in II-IHNB, providing prolonged analgesia, reduced opioid consumption, and stable haemodynamics with an acceptable sedation profile.

右美托咪定与硫酸镁作为罗哌卡因佐剂在髂腹股沟-髂腹下神经阻滞治疗腹股沟疝修补中的应用:一项随机对照试验。
背景与目的:超声引导下髂腹股沟-髂胃下神经阻滞(II-IHNB)为腹股沟疝手术提供了有效的镇痛方法;然而,单纯局部麻醉的镇痛持续时间有限。本研究比较了右美托咪定和硫酸镁作为辅助罗哌卡因治疗II-IHNB的效果。方法:120例患者随机分为3组,每组40例。A组给予0.5%罗哌卡因,B组给予罗哌卡因加硫酸镁(5mg /kg), C组给予罗哌卡因加右美托咪定(1µg/kg)。主要观察指标为首次镇痛时间。次要结果包括视觉模拟评分(VAS)评分、24小时阿片类药物消耗、镇静、血流动力学参数和不良事件。结果:C组首次抢救镇痛时间明显长于A组,中位差1080 min[95%可信区间(CI): 923 ~ 1125 min;P < 0.001]。C组24小时阿片类药物总消耗量显著低于A组,中位数差异为- 10吗啡毫克当量(95% CI: -15至- 5;P < 0.001)。C组术后多个时间点的静止和运动VAS评分均显著低于对照组(P < 0.001)。C组术后即刻镇静评分较高(P < 0.001),但未出现明显的临床呼吸抑制。两组间血流动力学参数和不良事件发生率具有可比性(P < 0.05)。结论:在II-IHNB中,右美托咪定作为罗哌卡因的辅助剂优于硫酸镁,可以延长镇痛时间,减少阿片类药物的消耗,稳定血流动力学并具有可接受的镇静特性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
44.80%
发文量
210
审稿时长
36 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书