Privacy, temporal flexibility and connection: how online spaces shape abortion support.

IF 3.2 3区 医学 Q1 FAMILY STUDIES
Rachel Victoria Wilson-Lowe, Carrie Purcell, Ruth Lewis, Lisa McDaid
{"title":"Privacy, temporal flexibility and connection: how online spaces shape abortion support.","authors":"Rachel Victoria Wilson-Lowe, Carrie Purcell, Ruth Lewis, Lisa McDaid","doi":"10.1136/bmjsrh-2026-203253","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Online spaces are increasingly used by people seeking support around sexual and reproductive healthcare and can offer anonymity and flexibility. Relatively little is known about how these spaces are used in relation to abortion. This article explores what informal online spaces (eg, social media and discussion forums) offer to those seeking support around abortion, in the face of increasingly digitalised healthcare, persistent abortion stigma and resource constraints on sexual and reproductive health services.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted semi-structured interviews with individuals who had sought abortion-related support online. Twenty-three women, aged 20-54 years, who had undergone abortion and were living in Scotland at the time of the interview were recruited through social media and online advertisements. Data were analysed using reflexive thematic analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We identified three principal affordances of online spaces that shaped participants' experiences of accessing support online: (1) privacy-participants chose online spaces based on perceptions of the potential (in)visibility of their interactions with abortion-related content and anonymity; (2) temporal flexibility-support could be sought as and when needed, derived from posts long after they were created; and (3) connection to others with experiential knowledge of abortion-engagement ranged from active interactions to anonymous browsing, with one-way participation providing meaningful support at low social cost.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our findings suggest that online spaces can provide flexible, stigma-sensitive, abortion-affirming support. Those who provide abortion services should consider ways in which trustworthy online spaces can be integrated into existing care pathways to reduce isolation and address unmet social support needs.</p>","PeriodicalId":9219,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Sexual & Reproductive Health","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ Sexual & Reproductive Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjsrh-2026-203253","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"FAMILY STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Online spaces are increasingly used by people seeking support around sexual and reproductive healthcare and can offer anonymity and flexibility. Relatively little is known about how these spaces are used in relation to abortion. This article explores what informal online spaces (eg, social media and discussion forums) offer to those seeking support around abortion, in the face of increasingly digitalised healthcare, persistent abortion stigma and resource constraints on sexual and reproductive health services.

Methods: We conducted semi-structured interviews with individuals who had sought abortion-related support online. Twenty-three women, aged 20-54 years, who had undergone abortion and were living in Scotland at the time of the interview were recruited through social media and online advertisements. Data were analysed using reflexive thematic analysis.

Results: We identified three principal affordances of online spaces that shaped participants' experiences of accessing support online: (1) privacy-participants chose online spaces based on perceptions of the potential (in)visibility of their interactions with abortion-related content and anonymity; (2) temporal flexibility-support could be sought as and when needed, derived from posts long after they were created; and (3) connection to others with experiential knowledge of abortion-engagement ranged from active interactions to anonymous browsing, with one-way participation providing meaningful support at low social cost.

Conclusions: Our findings suggest that online spaces can provide flexible, stigma-sensitive, abortion-affirming support. Those who provide abortion services should consider ways in which trustworthy online spaces can be integrated into existing care pathways to reduce isolation and address unmet social support needs.

隐私、时间灵活性和联系:网络空间如何塑造堕胎支持。
背景:人们越来越多地利用在线空间寻求性健康和生殖健康方面的支持,并且可以提供匿名性和灵活性。相对而言,人们对这些空间如何用于堕胎知之甚少。面对日益数字化的医疗保健、持续存在的堕胎污名以及性健康和生殖健康服务的资源限制,本文探讨了非正式的在线空间(如社交媒体和论坛)为那些寻求堕胎支持的人提供了什么。方法:我们对在线寻求堕胎相关支持的个人进行了半结构化访谈。通过社交媒体和在线广告招募了23名年龄在20-54岁之间的堕胎妇女,她们在接受采访时居住在苏格兰。数据分析采用反身性主题分析。结果:我们确定了在线空间的三个主要启示,这些启示塑造了参与者在线访问支持的体验:(1)隐私——参与者选择在线空间是基于他们与堕胎相关内容和匿名性互动的潜在可见性的感知;(2)时间上的灵活性- -在需要时可寻求从员额设立很久以后得到的支助;(3)通过人工流产参与的经验知识与他人建立联系,从主动互动到匿名浏览,单向参与以低社会成本提供有意义的支持。结论:我们的研究结果表明,在线空间可以提供灵活的、对歧视敏感的、肯定堕胎的支持。提供堕胎服务的人应考虑如何将可信赖的在线空间纳入现有的护理途径,以减少孤立并解决未得到满足的社会支持需求。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMJ Sexual & Reproductive Health
BMJ Sexual & Reproductive Health Medicine-Reproductive Medicine
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
6.10%
发文量
38
期刊介绍: BMJ Sexual & Reproductive Health is a multiprofessional journal that promotes sexual and reproductive health and wellbeing, and best contraceptive practice, worldwide. It publishes research, debate and comment to inform policy and practice, and recognises the importance of professional-patient partnership.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书