Defining the Efficacy of Meningococcal B Vaccines Against Gonococcal Acquisition: The Current Landscape

IF 5.2 1区 医学 Q2 IMMUNOLOGY
Kate L. Seib, Andrew E. Grulich
{"title":"Defining the Efficacy of Meningococcal B Vaccines Against Gonococcal Acquisition: The Current Landscape","authors":"Kate L. Seib,&nbsp;Andrew E. Grulich","doi":"10.1002/jia2.70153","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Introduction</h3>\n \n <p>Gonorrhoea is a major global sexually transmitted infection, with rising incidence and increasing antimicrobial resistance threatening current control strategies. If untreated, <i>Neisseria gonorrhoeae</i> can lead to severe reproductive health sequelae. Gonorrhoea is also linked to increased HIV acquisition and transmission. There is currently no vaccine licensed to prevent gonorrhoea. However, observational evidence suggests that outer membrane vesicle–based serogroup B meningococcal vaccines, including the four-component meningococcal B (4CMenB) vaccine, confer partial cross-protection against gonorrhoea. We discuss observational studies and randomized controlled trials (RCTs) focused on defining the efficacy of 4CMenB against gonorrhoea.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Discussion</h3>\n \n <p>Observational studies from multiple settings have reported an association between receipt of 4CMenB vaccine and reduced gonorrhoea risk, with a meta-analysis estimating a 38% reduction in risk. <i>Neisseria meningitidis</i> and <i>N. gonorrhoeae</i> are closely related bacteria that share numerous antigens, making cross-protection biologically plausible. Based on observational data, 4CMenB immunization programmes have been implemented in two countries with the aim of preventing gonorrhoea. However, three RCTs have recently shown that 4CMenB is not effective in preventing gonorrhoea in gay, bisexual and other men at high risk of acquisition. Several RCTs are ongoing, looking at efficacy in different populations, including women and people at lower risk of acquisition. The different outcomes between the observational studies and RCTs may be due to a range of known and unknown confounding factors, and differences in the populations considered in the different studies.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>Current evidence from RCTs does not support the use of 4CMenB to prevent gonorrhoea in gay and bisexual men at high risk of acquisition. Results from ongoing RCTs will be critical to determine whether vaccine efficacy varies by population or epidemiological context and to inform future gonorrhoea vaccine policy and development.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":201,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the International AIDS Society","volume":"29 S2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13400978/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the International AIDS Society","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jia2.70153","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"IMMUNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

Gonorrhoea is a major global sexually transmitted infection, with rising incidence and increasing antimicrobial resistance threatening current control strategies. If untreated, Neisseria gonorrhoeae can lead to severe reproductive health sequelae. Gonorrhoea is also linked to increased HIV acquisition and transmission. There is currently no vaccine licensed to prevent gonorrhoea. However, observational evidence suggests that outer membrane vesicle–based serogroup B meningococcal vaccines, including the four-component meningococcal B (4CMenB) vaccine, confer partial cross-protection against gonorrhoea. We discuss observational studies and randomized controlled trials (RCTs) focused on defining the efficacy of 4CMenB against gonorrhoea.

Discussion

Observational studies from multiple settings have reported an association between receipt of 4CMenB vaccine and reduced gonorrhoea risk, with a meta-analysis estimating a 38% reduction in risk. Neisseria meningitidis and N. gonorrhoeae are closely related bacteria that share numerous antigens, making cross-protection biologically plausible. Based on observational data, 4CMenB immunization programmes have been implemented in two countries with the aim of preventing gonorrhoea. However, three RCTs have recently shown that 4CMenB is not effective in preventing gonorrhoea in gay, bisexual and other men at high risk of acquisition. Several RCTs are ongoing, looking at efficacy in different populations, including women and people at lower risk of acquisition. The different outcomes between the observational studies and RCTs may be due to a range of known and unknown confounding factors, and differences in the populations considered in the different studies.

Conclusions

Current evidence from RCTs does not support the use of 4CMenB to prevent gonorrhoea in gay and bisexual men at high risk of acquisition. Results from ongoing RCTs will be critical to determine whether vaccine efficacy varies by population or epidemiological context and to inform future gonorrhoea vaccine policy and development.

确定脑膜炎球菌B疫苗对淋球菌感染的有效性:目前的情况。
淋病是一种主要的全球性性传播感染,其发病率上升和抗菌素耐药性增加威胁到当前的控制策略。如果不治疗,淋病奈瑟菌可导致严重的生殖健康后遗症。淋病还与艾滋病毒感染和传播增加有关。目前还没有批准用于预防淋病的疫苗。然而,观察性证据表明,以外膜囊泡为基础的血清B群脑膜炎球菌疫苗,包括四组分脑膜炎球菌B (4CMenB)疫苗,对淋病具有部分交叉保护作用。我们讨论了观察性研究和随机对照试验(rct),重点是确定4CMenB对淋病的疗效。讨论:来自多个环境的观察性研究报告了接种4CMenB疫苗与淋病风险降低之间的关联,一项荟萃分析估计风险降低了38%。脑膜炎奈瑟菌和淋病奈瑟菌是密切相关的细菌,它们共享许多抗原,这使得交叉保护在生物学上是合理的。根据观测数据,已在两个国家实施了4CMenB免疫规划,目的是预防淋病。然而,最近的三项随机对照试验显示,4CMenB对男同性恋、双性恋和其他感染风险高的男性淋病预防无效。几项随机对照试验正在进行中,观察在不同人群中的疗效,包括妇女和感染风险较低的人群。观察性研究和随机对照试验之间的不同结果可能是由于一系列已知和未知的混杂因素,以及不同研究中考虑的人群的差异。结论:目前来自随机对照试验的证据不支持使用4CMenB来预防感染风险高的男同性恋和双性恋男性淋病。正在进行的随机对照试验的结果对于确定疫苗效力是否因人群或流行病学背景而异以及为未来淋病疫苗政策和发展提供信息至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of the International AIDS Society
Journal of the International AIDS Society IMMUNOLOGY-INFECTIOUS DISEASES
CiteScore
8.60
自引率
10.00%
发文量
186
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of the International AIDS Society (JIAS) is a peer-reviewed and Open Access journal for the generation and dissemination of evidence from a wide range of disciplines: basic and biomedical sciences; behavioural sciences; epidemiology; clinical sciences; health economics and health policy; operations research and implementation sciences; and social sciences and humanities. Submission of HIV research carried out in low- and middle-income countries is strongly encouraged.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书