Sustained Utilization of Video-Based Outpatient Psychiatry Visits Following the COVID-19 Public Health Emergency at an Academic Health Center.

IF 2
Brent Heineman, Grace Chan, Neha Jain
{"title":"Sustained Utilization of Video-Based Outpatient Psychiatry Visits Following the COVID-19 Public Health Emergency at an Academic Health Center.","authors":"Brent Heineman, Grace Chan, Neha Jain","doi":"10.1177/15305627261471704","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Telepsychiatry expanded rapidly during the COVID-19 pandemic to support continuity of psychiatric care, although its long-term durability following the expiration of pandemic-era policies remains uncertain. This study evaluated long-term utilization of telepsychiatry and patient and clinician acceptability within outpatient practice.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A repeated cross-sectional electronic health record analysis of outpatient psychiatric visits from 2020 to 2025 compared in-person and virtual visit completion and no-show rates across five annual intervals. Telepsychiatry acceptability was evaluated through a patient survey administered in 2021-2022 (<i>n</i> = 655) and clinician surveys conducted in 2020 (<i>n</i> = 50) and 2025 (<i>n</i> = 38).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 219,007 visits, 44% were in-person and 56% were virtual. The overall no-show rate was 10.46%, with no significant difference between visit types (<i>p</i> = 0.178). Two intervals demonstrated significant differences: 2021-2022 (virtual = 9.6%, in-person = 11.0%, <i>p</i> < 0.001) and 2024-2025 (virtual = 11.9%, in-person = 10.9%, <i>p</i> < 0.001). The percentage of no-show visits increased as virtual visits decreased (Spearman's correlation = -0.90, <i>p</i> = 0.037). Most patients agreed that their telepsychiatry visit was as good as in-person (92.4%) and more convenient (97.1%). Provider belief that virtual visits were as effective as in-person decreased from 92.0% in 2020 to 74.3% in 2025 (<i>p</i> = 0.026).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Telepsychiatry utilization remains a substantial component of outpatient care. Comparable no-show rates and high patient satisfaction support telepsychiatry as a viable and acceptable modality, although provider enthusiasm appears to have moderated over time.</p>","PeriodicalId":520784,"journal":{"name":"Telemedicine journal and e-health : the official journal of the American Telemedicine Association","volume":" ","pages":"1130-1137"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Telemedicine journal and e-health : the official journal of the American Telemedicine Association","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15305627261471704","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/7/24 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Telepsychiatry expanded rapidly during the COVID-19 pandemic to support continuity of psychiatric care, although its long-term durability following the expiration of pandemic-era policies remains uncertain. This study evaluated long-term utilization of telepsychiatry and patient and clinician acceptability within outpatient practice.

Methods: A repeated cross-sectional electronic health record analysis of outpatient psychiatric visits from 2020 to 2025 compared in-person and virtual visit completion and no-show rates across five annual intervals. Telepsychiatry acceptability was evaluated through a patient survey administered in 2021-2022 (n = 655) and clinician surveys conducted in 2020 (n = 50) and 2025 (n = 38).

Results: Among 219,007 visits, 44% were in-person and 56% were virtual. The overall no-show rate was 10.46%, with no significant difference between visit types (p = 0.178). Two intervals demonstrated significant differences: 2021-2022 (virtual = 9.6%, in-person = 11.0%, p < 0.001) and 2024-2025 (virtual = 11.9%, in-person = 10.9%, p < 0.001). The percentage of no-show visits increased as virtual visits decreased (Spearman's correlation = -0.90, p = 0.037). Most patients agreed that their telepsychiatry visit was as good as in-person (92.4%) and more convenient (97.1%). Provider belief that virtual visits were as effective as in-person decreased from 92.0% in 2020 to 74.3% in 2025 (p = 0.026).

Conclusions: Telepsychiatry utilization remains a substantial component of outpatient care. Comparable no-show rates and high patient satisfaction support telepsychiatry as a viable and acceptable modality, although provider enthusiasm appears to have moderated over time.

2019冠状病毒病突发公共卫生事件后学术卫生中心基于视频的门诊精神病学访问的持续利用
背景:远程精神病学在2019冠状病毒病大流行期间迅速扩大,以支持精神科护理的连续性,尽管其在大流行时期政策到期后的长期持久性仍不确定。本研究评估了远程精神病学在门诊实践中的长期利用以及患者和临床医生的可接受性。方法:对2020年至2025年门诊精神病患者的重复横断面电子健康记录进行分析,比较5年期间的面对面和虚拟就诊完成率和缺勤率。通过2021-2022年进行的患者调查(n = 655)和2020年(n = 50)和2025年(n = 38)进行的临床医生调查来评估远程精神病学的可接受性。结果:在219007次访问中,44%是亲自访问,56%是虚拟访问。总体缺席率为10.46%,不同访视类型间差异无统计学意义(p = 0.178)。两个区间表现出显著差异:2021-2022(虚拟= 9.6%,面对面= 11.0%,p < 0.001)和2024-2025(虚拟= 11.9%,面对面= 10.9%,p < 0.001)。随着虚拟访问的减少,缺席访问的百分比增加(Spearman相关系数= -0.90,p = 0.037)。大多数患者认为他们的远程精神病学访问与面对面访问一样好(92.4%),更方便(97.1%)。提供者认为虚拟访问与亲自访问一样有效的观点从2020年的92.0%下降到2025年的74.3% (p = 0.026)。结论:远程精神病学的利用仍然是门诊护理的重要组成部分。虽然提供者的热情随着时间的推移似乎有所缓和,但相对的缺勤率和较高的患者满意度支持远程精神病学作为一种可行和可接受的模式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书