{"title":"Sustained Utilization of Video-Based Outpatient Psychiatry Visits Following the COVID-19 Public Health Emergency at an Academic Health Center.","authors":"Brent Heineman, Grace Chan, Neha Jain","doi":"10.1177/15305627261471704","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Telepsychiatry expanded rapidly during the COVID-19 pandemic to support continuity of psychiatric care, although its long-term durability following the expiration of pandemic-era policies remains uncertain. This study evaluated long-term utilization of telepsychiatry and patient and clinician acceptability within outpatient practice.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A repeated cross-sectional electronic health record analysis of outpatient psychiatric visits from 2020 to 2025 compared in-person and virtual visit completion and no-show rates across five annual intervals. Telepsychiatry acceptability was evaluated through a patient survey administered in 2021-2022 (<i>n</i> = 655) and clinician surveys conducted in 2020 (<i>n</i> = 50) and 2025 (<i>n</i> = 38).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 219,007 visits, 44% were in-person and 56% were virtual. The overall no-show rate was 10.46%, with no significant difference between visit types (<i>p</i> = 0.178). Two intervals demonstrated significant differences: 2021-2022 (virtual = 9.6%, in-person = 11.0%, <i>p</i> < 0.001) and 2024-2025 (virtual = 11.9%, in-person = 10.9%, <i>p</i> < 0.001). The percentage of no-show visits increased as virtual visits decreased (Spearman's correlation = -0.90, <i>p</i> = 0.037). Most patients agreed that their telepsychiatry visit was as good as in-person (92.4%) and more convenient (97.1%). Provider belief that virtual visits were as effective as in-person decreased from 92.0% in 2020 to 74.3% in 2025 (<i>p</i> = 0.026).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Telepsychiatry utilization remains a substantial component of outpatient care. Comparable no-show rates and high patient satisfaction support telepsychiatry as a viable and acceptable modality, although provider enthusiasm appears to have moderated over time.</p>","PeriodicalId":520784,"journal":{"name":"Telemedicine journal and e-health : the official journal of the American Telemedicine Association","volume":" ","pages":"1130-1137"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Telemedicine journal and e-health : the official journal of the American Telemedicine Association","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15305627261471704","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/7/24 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Telepsychiatry expanded rapidly during the COVID-19 pandemic to support continuity of psychiatric care, although its long-term durability following the expiration of pandemic-era policies remains uncertain. This study evaluated long-term utilization of telepsychiatry and patient and clinician acceptability within outpatient practice.
Methods: A repeated cross-sectional electronic health record analysis of outpatient psychiatric visits from 2020 to 2025 compared in-person and virtual visit completion and no-show rates across five annual intervals. Telepsychiatry acceptability was evaluated through a patient survey administered in 2021-2022 (n = 655) and clinician surveys conducted in 2020 (n = 50) and 2025 (n = 38).
Results: Among 219,007 visits, 44% were in-person and 56% were virtual. The overall no-show rate was 10.46%, with no significant difference between visit types (p = 0.178). Two intervals demonstrated significant differences: 2021-2022 (virtual = 9.6%, in-person = 11.0%, p < 0.001) and 2024-2025 (virtual = 11.9%, in-person = 10.9%, p < 0.001). The percentage of no-show visits increased as virtual visits decreased (Spearman's correlation = -0.90, p = 0.037). Most patients agreed that their telepsychiatry visit was as good as in-person (92.4%) and more convenient (97.1%). Provider belief that virtual visits were as effective as in-person decreased from 92.0% in 2020 to 74.3% in 2025 (p = 0.026).
Conclusions: Telepsychiatry utilization remains a substantial component of outpatient care. Comparable no-show rates and high patient satisfaction support telepsychiatry as a viable and acceptable modality, although provider enthusiasm appears to have moderated over time.