Predictive deep learning model based on contrast-enhanced mammography for breast cancer diagnosis: a pilot study.

BJR artificial intelligence Pub Date : 2026-06-29 eCollection Date: 2026-01-01 DOI:10.1093/bjrai/ubag013
Roberto Maroncelli, Chiara De Nardo, Veronica Rizzo, Federica Cicciarelli, Marcella Pasculli, Francesca Galati, Federica Pediconi
{"title":"Predictive deep learning model based on contrast-enhanced mammography for breast cancer diagnosis: a pilot study.","authors":"Roberto Maroncelli, Chiara De Nardo, Veronica Rizzo, Federica Cicciarelli, Marcella Pasculli, Francesca Galati, Federica Pediconi","doi":"10.1093/bjrai/ubag013","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The interpretation of contrast-enhanced mammography (CEM) images heavily depends on radiologists' expertise, highlighting the need for automated tools to assist clinical decision-making. This pilot study aimed to develop a deep learning model using CEM images to predict the histological diagnosis of breast cancer.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We retrospectively analyzed patients who underwent CEM followed by histopathological assessment (October 2022-May 2023) across 2 centers. CEM images from center 1 were used for model development, including training and 10-fold cross-validation, while images from center 2 served as an independent external test set. The breast region was manually segmented, and 2 deep learning architectures were implemented as ensemble classifiers, using biopsy results as reference standard. Performance metrics included accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), and area under the Receiver Operating Characteristic Curve (ROC) curve (AUC).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 106 CEM images were retrospectively analyzed (50 from center 1 and 56 from center 2), obtained using different mammography systems. Histopathology identified 51 lesions (48%) as malignant and 55 (52%) as benign. Cross-validation yielded an ROC-AUC of 75% [58.4-91.6], accuracy of 68.7% [58.3-79], sensitivity of 68.9% [52.2-85.6], specificity of 67.8% [65.4-70.2], PPV of 69.3% [55.5-83.1], and NPV of 73.5% [55.2-91.8] (<i>P</i> < .05). External testing on images from center 2 (27 malignant, 29 benign) achieved an accuracy of 64.3%.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The study showed promising performance but requires further development and dataset expansion. The model has the potential to be integrated into clinical practice.</p><p><strong>Advances in knowledge: </strong>A deep learning model based on CEM provides a tool to support physicians in the decision-making process and reduce invasiveness in breast cancer management.</p>","PeriodicalId":517427,"journal":{"name":"BJR artificial intelligence","volume":"3 1","pages":"ubag013"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13394488/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BJR artificial intelligence","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/bjrai/ubag013","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: The interpretation of contrast-enhanced mammography (CEM) images heavily depends on radiologists' expertise, highlighting the need for automated tools to assist clinical decision-making. This pilot study aimed to develop a deep learning model using CEM images to predict the histological diagnosis of breast cancer.

Methods: We retrospectively analyzed patients who underwent CEM followed by histopathological assessment (October 2022-May 2023) across 2 centers. CEM images from center 1 were used for model development, including training and 10-fold cross-validation, while images from center 2 served as an independent external test set. The breast region was manually segmented, and 2 deep learning architectures were implemented as ensemble classifiers, using biopsy results as reference standard. Performance metrics included accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), and area under the Receiver Operating Characteristic Curve (ROC) curve (AUC).

Results: A total of 106 CEM images were retrospectively analyzed (50 from center 1 and 56 from center 2), obtained using different mammography systems. Histopathology identified 51 lesions (48%) as malignant and 55 (52%) as benign. Cross-validation yielded an ROC-AUC of 75% [58.4-91.6], accuracy of 68.7% [58.3-79], sensitivity of 68.9% [52.2-85.6], specificity of 67.8% [65.4-70.2], PPV of 69.3% [55.5-83.1], and NPV of 73.5% [55.2-91.8] (P < .05). External testing on images from center 2 (27 malignant, 29 benign) achieved an accuracy of 64.3%.

Conclusions: The study showed promising performance but requires further development and dataset expansion. The model has the potential to be integrated into clinical practice.

Advances in knowledge: A deep learning model based on CEM provides a tool to support physicians in the decision-making process and reduce invasiveness in breast cancer management.

基于对比增强乳房x光检查的预测深度学习模型用于乳腺癌诊断:一项试点研究。
目的:对比增强乳房x线摄影(CEM)图像的解释在很大程度上依赖于放射科医生的专业知识,强调需要自动化工具来辅助临床决策。本初步研究旨在开发一种使用CEM图像的深度学习模型来预测乳腺癌的组织学诊断。方法:我们回顾性分析了两个中心接受CEM后进行组织病理学评估的患者(2022年10月至2023年5月)。来自中心1的CEM图像用于模型开发,包括训练和10倍交叉验证,而来自中心2的图像作为独立的外部测试集。人工分割乳房区域,以活检结果为参考标准,实现2种深度学习架构作为集成分类器。性能指标包括准确性、敏感性、特异性、阳性预测值(PPV)、阴性预测值(NPV)和受试者工作特征曲线(ROC)曲线下面积(AUC)。结果:回顾性分析使用不同乳房x线摄影系统获得的106张CEM图像(1中心50张,2中心56张)。组织病理学鉴定51例(48%)为恶性病变,55例(52%)为良性病变。交叉验证的ROC-AUC为75%[58.4-91.6],准确率为68.7%[58.3-79],灵敏度为68.9%[52.2-85.6],特异性为67.8% [65.4-70.2],PPV为69.3% [55.5-83.1],NPV为73.5% [55.2-91.8](P)结论:本研究表现良好,但需要进一步发展和扩展数据集。该模型具有整合到临床实践中的潜力。知识的进步:基于CEM的深度学习模型为医生在决策过程中提供了支持,并减少了乳腺癌管理的侵入性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书