Irini K Zerva, Eleni Bonti, Marilena Mousoulidou, Andri Christodoulou, Michael Galanakis
{"title":"Informing Cancer Education and School Reintegration After Childhood Cancer: Metacognitive, Psychosocial, and School-Participation Indicators.","authors":"Irini K Zerva, Eleni Bonti, Marilena Mousoulidou, Andri Christodoulou, Michael Galanakis","doi":"10.1007/s13187-026-02951-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Children and adolescents with a history of childhood cancer may experience psychosocial, cognitive, and school-related difficulties, yet survivorship education and follow-up need to reflect heterogeneous needs rather than assume uniform impairment. This cross-sectional case-comparison study compared shared psychosocial and metacognitive outcomes in 61 participants with a history of childhood cancer and 57 age-aligned typically developing peers aged 8-17 years, and examined trauma-related symptoms and school-related burden within the cancer-history group. Shared Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire outcomes and harmonized Metacognitions Questionnaire-derived outcomes were analyzed using Welch tests, Hedges' g, and false-discovery-rate correction. Within the cancer-history group, correlations and theory-driven regression models examined metacognitive correlates of psychosocial, trauma-related, and school-impact outcomes. The analyses provided no evidence of statistically reliable between-group differences after correction, although the modest sample means that small group differences cannot be excluded. Within the cancer-history group, low cognitive confidence in memory was strongly associated with hyperactivity/inattention and total difficulties, and negative beliefs about worry were the clearest unique statistical correlate of trauma-related symptoms. School-related burden was common, with 60.7% endorsing at least one school-impact item, but this prevalence should be interpreted cautiously because comparable school-impact data were not collected from peers. The findings inform cancer education by identifying targets for survivorship psychoeducation, family-school-health-care communication, and school reintegration support: perceived cognitive competence, worry-related beliefs, and school participation.</p>","PeriodicalId":50246,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cancer Education","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cancer Education","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s13187-026-02951-9","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Children and adolescents with a history of childhood cancer may experience psychosocial, cognitive, and school-related difficulties, yet survivorship education and follow-up need to reflect heterogeneous needs rather than assume uniform impairment. This cross-sectional case-comparison study compared shared psychosocial and metacognitive outcomes in 61 participants with a history of childhood cancer and 57 age-aligned typically developing peers aged 8-17 years, and examined trauma-related symptoms and school-related burden within the cancer-history group. Shared Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire outcomes and harmonized Metacognitions Questionnaire-derived outcomes were analyzed using Welch tests, Hedges' g, and false-discovery-rate correction. Within the cancer-history group, correlations and theory-driven regression models examined metacognitive correlates of psychosocial, trauma-related, and school-impact outcomes. The analyses provided no evidence of statistically reliable between-group differences after correction, although the modest sample means that small group differences cannot be excluded. Within the cancer-history group, low cognitive confidence in memory was strongly associated with hyperactivity/inattention and total difficulties, and negative beliefs about worry were the clearest unique statistical correlate of trauma-related symptoms. School-related burden was common, with 60.7% endorsing at least one school-impact item, but this prevalence should be interpreted cautiously because comparable school-impact data were not collected from peers. The findings inform cancer education by identifying targets for survivorship psychoeducation, family-school-health-care communication, and school reintegration support: perceived cognitive competence, worry-related beliefs, and school participation.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Cancer Education, the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education (AACE) and the European Association for Cancer Education (EACE), is an international, quarterly journal dedicated to the publication of original contributions dealing with the varied aspects of cancer education for physicians, dentists, nurses, students, social workers and other allied health professionals, patients, the general public, and anyone interested in effective education about cancer related issues.
Articles featured include reports of original results of educational research, as well as discussions of current problems and techniques in cancer education. Manuscripts are welcome on such subjects as educational methods, instruments, and program evaluation. Suitable topics include teaching of basic science aspects of cancer; the assessment of attitudes toward cancer patient management; the teaching of diagnostic skills relevant to cancer; the evaluation of undergraduate, postgraduate, or continuing education programs; and articles about all aspects of cancer education from prevention to palliative care.
We encourage contributions to a special column called Reflections; these articles should relate to the human aspects of dealing with cancer, cancer patients, and their families and finding meaning and support in these efforts.
Letters to the Editor (600 words or less) dealing with published articles or matters of current interest are also invited.
Also featured are commentary; book and media reviews; and announcements of educational programs, fellowships, and grants.
Articles should be limited to no more than ten double-spaced typed pages, and there should be no more than three tables or figures and 25 references. We also encourage brief reports of five typewritten pages or less, with no more than one figure or table and 15 references.