Daily Monitoring of Behavioral and Psychological Symptoms of Dementia in Residential Care: Mixed Methods Pilot Study.

IF 4.6 Q1 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY
JMIR Aging Pub Date : 2026-07-23 DOI:10.2196/98024
Johannes Malm, Therése Bielsten, Charlotta Nilsen, Elzana Odzakovic, Ingemar Kåreholt
{"title":"Daily Monitoring of Behavioral and Psychological Symptoms of Dementia in Residential Care: Mixed Methods Pilot Study.","authors":"Johannes Malm, Therése Bielsten, Charlotta Nilsen, Elzana Odzakovic, Ingemar Kåreholt","doi":"10.2196/98024","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Many clinically relevant aspects of health are expressed through behavior, affect, and interaction, and therefore rely on observation rather than instrumental measurement; yet such information is often documented infrequently in routine care. Dementia, and particularly behavioral and psychological symptoms of dementia (BPSD), is a relevant case because symptoms fluctuate across time and context. Little is known about how structured daily symptom assessment can be integrated into routine dementia care practice.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This pilot study aimed to investigate whether structured daily observation of BPSD, supported by digital documentation, can be incorporated into everyday residential dementia care.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A convergent mixed methods design was applied across 4 nursing home units in southern Sweden. Feasibility was operationalized through 4 focus areas (implementation, practicality, acceptability, and integration), with adherence to the registration routine as the primary feasibility outcome. Quantitative data comprised structured registrations collected daily by care staff over 90 days for 8 residents with BPSD, analyzed descriptively, and interpreted using selected NASSS (nonadoption, abandonment, scale-up, spread, and sustainability) framework domains to contextualize variation in symptom patterns, adherence, and registration practices. Semistructured dyadic interviews were analyzed using deductive content analysis guided by the same domains, with integration occurring at the analytical and interpretive stages.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 21,993 item-level registrations were completed: 19,123 NPI-NH (Neuropsychiatric Inventory - Nursing Home version) symptom ratings, recorded across 1623 shift registrations (1 per resident per shift), and 2870 individually selected variables. Overall adherence to the registration routine averaged 75% across shifts but varied considerably between residents (range 33%-90%) and between staff members. Mean time per shift registration decreased from 77.1 seconds in the initial 30-day period to 46.2 seconds in the final 30-day period (P=.008). Symptom prevalence varied widely across NPI domains (7.5% to 38.1% of observation days), and daily symptom counts varied both between and within residents. The routine was experienced as technically straightforward and easy to incorporate into daily work. At the same time, challenges emerged, including time constraints, inconsistent participation, varying levels of interpretive confidence, and difficulties distinguishing among overlapping symptoms. Organizational routines and team stability were central to sustaining staff engagement.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The high number of completed registrations indicates that daily observations can be integrated into daily dementia care. The participants perceived it as meaningful and useful. Feasibility was primarily influenced by organizational and interpretive factors rather than technical constraints. Further research should explore strategies to support shared routines and sustain engagement over time.</p>","PeriodicalId":36245,"journal":{"name":"JMIR Aging","volume":"9 ","pages":"e98024"},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13395431/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JMIR Aging","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2196/98024","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Many clinically relevant aspects of health are expressed through behavior, affect, and interaction, and therefore rely on observation rather than instrumental measurement; yet such information is often documented infrequently in routine care. Dementia, and particularly behavioral and psychological symptoms of dementia (BPSD), is a relevant case because symptoms fluctuate across time and context. Little is known about how structured daily symptom assessment can be integrated into routine dementia care practice.

Objective: This pilot study aimed to investigate whether structured daily observation of BPSD, supported by digital documentation, can be incorporated into everyday residential dementia care.

Methods: A convergent mixed methods design was applied across 4 nursing home units in southern Sweden. Feasibility was operationalized through 4 focus areas (implementation, practicality, acceptability, and integration), with adherence to the registration routine as the primary feasibility outcome. Quantitative data comprised structured registrations collected daily by care staff over 90 days for 8 residents with BPSD, analyzed descriptively, and interpreted using selected NASSS (nonadoption, abandonment, scale-up, spread, and sustainability) framework domains to contextualize variation in symptom patterns, adherence, and registration practices. Semistructured dyadic interviews were analyzed using deductive content analysis guided by the same domains, with integration occurring at the analytical and interpretive stages.

Results: A total of 21,993 item-level registrations were completed: 19,123 NPI-NH (Neuropsychiatric Inventory - Nursing Home version) symptom ratings, recorded across 1623 shift registrations (1 per resident per shift), and 2870 individually selected variables. Overall adherence to the registration routine averaged 75% across shifts but varied considerably between residents (range 33%-90%) and between staff members. Mean time per shift registration decreased from 77.1 seconds in the initial 30-day period to 46.2 seconds in the final 30-day period (P=.008). Symptom prevalence varied widely across NPI domains (7.5% to 38.1% of observation days), and daily symptom counts varied both between and within residents. The routine was experienced as technically straightforward and easy to incorporate into daily work. At the same time, challenges emerged, including time constraints, inconsistent participation, varying levels of interpretive confidence, and difficulties distinguishing among overlapping symptoms. Organizational routines and team stability were central to sustaining staff engagement.

Conclusions: The high number of completed registrations indicates that daily observations can be integrated into daily dementia care. The participants perceived it as meaningful and useful. Feasibility was primarily influenced by organizational and interpretive factors rather than technical constraints. Further research should explore strategies to support shared routines and sustain engagement over time.

住院护理中痴呆行为和心理症状的日常监测:混合方法试点研究
背景:健康的许多临床相关方面是通过行为、情感和相互作用来表达的,因此依赖于观察而不是仪器测量;然而,这些信息在常规护理中很少被记录下来。痴呆症,特别是痴呆症的行为和心理症状(BPSD),是一个相关的案例,因为症状随时间和环境而变化。对于如何将结构化的日常症状评估整合到日常痴呆症护理实践中,我们知之甚少。目的:本初步研究旨在探讨BPSD的结构化日常观察,并以数字文件为支持,是否可以纳入日常痴呆住院护理。方法:采用融合混合方法设计对瑞典南部的4家养老院单位进行研究。可行性通过4个重点领域(实施、实用性、可接受性和整合性)进行操作,遵守注册程序是主要的可行性结果。定量数据包括护理人员在90天内每天收集的8名BPSD患者的结构化登记,并使用选定的NASSS(未采用、放弃、扩大、传播和可持续性)框架域进行描述性分析和解释,以了解症状模式、依从性和登记实践的变化。采用相同领域指导下的演绎内容分析对半结构化二元访谈进行分析,并在分析和解释阶段进行整合。结果:共完成了21,993项项目级登记:19,123个NPI-NH(神经精神量表-养老院版)症状评分,记录在1623个轮班登记中(每个住院医师每班1个),以及2870个单独选择的变量。每班平均有75%的人遵守登记程序,但住院医生之间(33%-90%)和工作人员之间的差异很大。每次轮班登记的平均时间从最初30天期间的77.1秒减少到最后30天期间的46.2秒(P= 0.008)。症状患病率在NPI域之间差异很大(观察天数的7.5%至38.1%),每日症状计数在居民之间和居民内部都有差异。这个程序在技术上是直截了当的,很容易融入日常工作。与此同时,出现了挑战,包括时间限制、不一致的参与、不同程度的解释信心以及难以区分重叠的症状。组织惯例和团队稳定是维持员工敬业度的核心。结论:完成登记的高数量表明日常观察可以融入日常痴呆症护理。参与者认为这是有意义和有用的。可行性主要受到组织和解释因素的影响,而不是技术限制。进一步的研究应该探索支持共享日常活动和长期保持参与的策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
JMIR Aging
JMIR Aging Social Sciences-Health (social science)
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
4.10%
发文量
71
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书