Ego depletion in cancer: why and how to measure it? The EDIC scale-a measure development research.

IF 2 3区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Opher Caspi, Gillie Gabay
{"title":"Ego depletion in cancer: why and how to measure it? The EDIC scale-a measure development research.","authors":"Opher Caspi, Gillie Gabay","doi":"10.1080/08870446.2026.2706476","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To develop a measure for ego-depletion in oncology, as a foundational step for research and future interventions to reduce ego-depletion in adults coping with cancer.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Helsinki Ethical approval was granted by the ethics board of the medical centre with which the first author is affiliated. A cross-sectional field test was carried out. Based on the conceptualisation and measurement of ego-depletion, health professionals from a multidisciplinary team at a cancer centre developed items according to the content of ego-depletion and its demonstration in cancer. To validate the measure, we used the Piper Fatigue in Cancer scale, the Emotional and Functional well-being scales from the General Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy scale, and the Busing self-regulation scale. REDCap, a web-based application, was used to capture data, structure the questionnaire, and distribute it. The final sample comprised 364 respondents.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Descriptive statistics and item characteristics were carried out. Item reduction was performed using partial inter-item correlations and factor analyses. A three-factor structure underlying 27 items on the Ego-Depletion in Cancer Scale (EDIC) was supported. We label the first factor '<i>Actively Withstanding Ego-depletion</i>,' the second factor '<i>Ego-depletion Ambivalence</i>,' and the third factor '<i>Ego Cognitive Exhaustion</i>.' The EDIC significantly correlated with related measures (e.g. fatigue, self-control, and positive emotions; <i>p</i> < .05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>A full EDIC scale, three subscales of the 27 items, is presented. Correlations demonstrated convergent validity and suggested the EDIC is distinct from existing constructs. Implications and applications are discussed. A path analysis demonstrated that the EDIC scale is valid for measuring ego depletion in adults with cancer.</p>","PeriodicalId":20718,"journal":{"name":"Psychology & Health","volume":" ","pages":"1-17"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychology & Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/08870446.2026.2706476","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To develop a measure for ego-depletion in oncology, as a foundational step for research and future interventions to reduce ego-depletion in adults coping with cancer.

Methods: Helsinki Ethical approval was granted by the ethics board of the medical centre with which the first author is affiliated. A cross-sectional field test was carried out. Based on the conceptualisation and measurement of ego-depletion, health professionals from a multidisciplinary team at a cancer centre developed items according to the content of ego-depletion and its demonstration in cancer. To validate the measure, we used the Piper Fatigue in Cancer scale, the Emotional and Functional well-being scales from the General Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy scale, and the Busing self-regulation scale. REDCap, a web-based application, was used to capture data, structure the questionnaire, and distribute it. The final sample comprised 364 respondents.

Results: Descriptive statistics and item characteristics were carried out. Item reduction was performed using partial inter-item correlations and factor analyses. A three-factor structure underlying 27 items on the Ego-Depletion in Cancer Scale (EDIC) was supported. We label the first factor 'Actively Withstanding Ego-depletion,' the second factor 'Ego-depletion Ambivalence,' and the third factor 'Ego Cognitive Exhaustion.' The EDIC significantly correlated with related measures (e.g. fatigue, self-control, and positive emotions; p < .05).

Conclusion: A full EDIC scale, three subscales of the 27 items, is presented. Correlations demonstrated convergent validity and suggested the EDIC is distinct from existing constructs. Implications and applications are discussed. A path analysis demonstrated that the EDIC scale is valid for measuring ego depletion in adults with cancer.

癌症中的自我损耗:为什么以及如何测量?EDIC量表——一种衡量发展研究的量表。
目的:建立肿瘤患者自我耗竭的测量方法,作为研究和未来干预措施减少成人癌症患者自我耗竭的基础步骤。方法:第一作者所属的医疗中心伦理委员会批准了赫尔辛基伦理批准。进行了横断面现场试验。基于自我损耗的概念和测量,来自癌症中心多学科团队的健康专业人员根据自我损耗的内容及其在癌症中的表现开发了项目。为了验证测量结果,我们使用了Piper癌症疲劳量表、癌症治疗一般功能评估量表中的情绪和功能幸福感量表以及Busing自我调节量表。REDCap是一个基于网络的应用程序,用于捕获数据,构建问卷,并分发它。最终样本包括364名受访者。结果:进行描述性统计和项目特征分析。使用部分项目间相关和因子分析进行项目缩减。癌症自我损耗量表(EDIC)中27个条目的三因素结构得到了支持。我们将第一个因素称为“积极抵抗自我损耗”,第二个因素称为“自我损耗矛盾心理”,第三个因素称为“自我认知衰竭”。EDIC与疲劳、自我控制、积极情绪等相关指标显著相关(p < 0.05)。结论:编制了完整的EDIC量表,包含27个条目的3个分量表。相关证明了收敛效度,并表明EDIC不同于现有的构念。讨论了影响和应用。通径分析表明,EDIC量表在测量成人癌症患者的自我消耗方面是有效的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.30
自引率
3.00%
发文量
95
期刊介绍: Psychology & Health promotes the study and application of psychological approaches to health and illness. The contents include work on psychological aspects of physical illness, treatment processes and recovery; psychosocial factors in the aetiology of physical illnesses; health attitudes and behaviour, including prevention; the individual-health care system interface particularly communication and psychologically-based interventions. The journal publishes original research, and accepts not only papers describing rigorous empirical work, including meta-analyses, but also those outlining new psychological approaches and interventions in health-related fields.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书