Endovascular embolization of carotid-cavernous fistulas: a single-center analysis of safety, technical success, and long-term outcomes.

IF 3.2 4区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Maciej Szmygin, Tomasz Roman, Marcin Czeczelewski, Pawel Szmygin, Joanna Bosowska, Radosław Rola
{"title":"Endovascular embolization of carotid-cavernous fistulas: a single-center analysis of safety, technical success, and long-term outcomes.","authors":"Maciej Szmygin, Tomasz Roman, Marcin Czeczelewski, Pawel Szmygin, Joanna Bosowska, Radosław Rola","doi":"10.5603/pjnns.111584","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Carotid-cavernous fistulas (CCFs) are abnormal shunts between the internal carotid artery and the cavernous sinus that may be high-flow direct or low-flow indirect lesions. They present with ocular symptoms and headache and are diagnosed primarily by cerebral angiography. This study evaluated the safety, technical success, and long-term outcomes of endovascular embolization for CCFs.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>This retrospective single-center study evaluated procedural and clinical outcomes of patients with CCFs treated with endovascular embolization. The evaluated outcomes included immediate procedural success on DSA, symptom resolution, procedure-related complications, and the rate of complete fistula occlusion on follow-up DSA.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty-three patients (mean age 57 years; 74% female) underwent endovascular treatment for carotid-cavernous fistulas, including 11 direct and 12 indirect lesions. The most common presenting symptoms were proptosis and orbital pain. Coil embolization was used in all cases, with adjunctive materials in 44% (10/23). Immediate complete occlusion was achieved in 48% (11/23) and complications occurred in 9% (2/23). Final follow-up DSA showed complete fistula closure in 91.3% of patients (21/23). Clinical improvement was achieved in 91.3% (21/23) of the cohort, with complete clinical resolution in 14 patients (61%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The results of our study suggest that long-term radiological and clinical outcomes in patients with CCFs treated with endovascular embolization were very satisfactory across all fistula types. Therefore, modern endovascular methods should be considered during the multidisciplinary evaluation of these patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":19132,"journal":{"name":"Neurologia i neurochirurgia polska","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neurologia i neurochirurgia polska","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5603/pjnns.111584","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Carotid-cavernous fistulas (CCFs) are abnormal shunts between the internal carotid artery and the cavernous sinus that may be high-flow direct or low-flow indirect lesions. They present with ocular symptoms and headache and are diagnosed primarily by cerebral angiography. This study evaluated the safety, technical success, and long-term outcomes of endovascular embolization for CCFs.

Material and methods: This retrospective single-center study evaluated procedural and clinical outcomes of patients with CCFs treated with endovascular embolization. The evaluated outcomes included immediate procedural success on DSA, symptom resolution, procedure-related complications, and the rate of complete fistula occlusion on follow-up DSA.

Results: Twenty-three patients (mean age 57 years; 74% female) underwent endovascular treatment for carotid-cavernous fistulas, including 11 direct and 12 indirect lesions. The most common presenting symptoms were proptosis and orbital pain. Coil embolization was used in all cases, with adjunctive materials in 44% (10/23). Immediate complete occlusion was achieved in 48% (11/23) and complications occurred in 9% (2/23). Final follow-up DSA showed complete fistula closure in 91.3% of patients (21/23). Clinical improvement was achieved in 91.3% (21/23) of the cohort, with complete clinical resolution in 14 patients (61%).

Conclusions: The results of our study suggest that long-term radiological and clinical outcomes in patients with CCFs treated with endovascular embolization were very satisfactory across all fistula types. Therefore, modern endovascular methods should be considered during the multidisciplinary evaluation of these patients.

血管内栓塞治疗颈动脉-海绵窦瘘:安全性、技术成功和长期结果的单中心分析。
颈内动脉-海绵窦瘘(CCFs)是颈内动脉和海绵窦之间的异常分流,可为高流量直接病变或低流量间接病变。他们表现为眼部症状和头痛,主要通过脑血管造影诊断。本研究评估了血管内栓塞治疗CCFs的安全性、技术成功和长期结果。材料和方法:本回顾性单中心研究评估了血管内栓塞治疗CCFs患者的手术和临床结果。评估的结果包括DSA的即时手术成功、症状缓解、手术相关并发症和后续DSA完全瘘闭塞率。结果:23例颈动脉海绵窦瘘行血管内治疗,其中直接病变11例,间接病变12例,平均年龄57岁,女性74%。最常见的症状是眼球突出和眼眶疼痛。所有病例均采用线圈栓塞,44%(10/23)采用辅助材料。48%(11/23)患者立即完全闭塞,9%(2/23)患者出现并发症。最终随访DSA显示91.3%的患者(21/23)瘘管完全闭合。91.3%(21/23)的队列患者临床改善,14例(61%)患者临床完全缓解。结论:我们的研究结果表明,在所有类型的瘘管中,血管内栓塞治疗的CCFs患者的长期放射学和临床结果都非常令人满意。因此,在对这些患者进行多学科评估时应考虑现代血管内方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Neurologia i neurochirurgia polska
Neurologia i neurochirurgia polska 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
27.60%
发文量
128
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Polish Journal of Neurology and Neurosurgery is an official journal of the Polish Society of Neurology and the Polish Society of Neurosurgeons, aimed at publishing high quality articles within the field of clinical neurology and neurosurgery, as well as related subspecialties. For more than a century, the journal has been providing its authors and readers with the opportunity to report, discuss, and share the issues important for every-day practice and research advances in the fields related to neurology and neurosurgery.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书