Limitations and Strengths of the SH-SY5Y Neuroblastoma Cell Line as a Model of β-Amyloid Neurotoxicity: Lessons From a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

IF 4.6 3区 医学 Q2 BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY
Nathalia R Pinheiro, Clarissa F D Carneiro, Giulia S Cancelliero, Giovanna O Nogueira, Glaucia M Almeida, Nathalia Fernandes, Ana Paula Wasilewska-Sampaio, Samantha M Martins, Antonio Felix, Olavo B Amaral, Adriano Sebollela
{"title":"Limitations and Strengths of the SH-SY5Y Neuroblastoma Cell Line as a Model of β-Amyloid Neurotoxicity: Lessons From a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.","authors":"Nathalia R Pinheiro, Clarissa F D Carneiro, Giulia S Cancelliero, Giovanna O Nogueira, Glaucia M Almeida, Nathalia Fernandes, Ana Paula Wasilewska-Sampaio, Samantha M Martins, Antonio Felix, Olavo B Amaral, Adriano Sebollela","doi":"10.1111/jnc.70523","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The SH-SY5Y human neuroblastoma cell line is widely used as an in vitro model of β-amyloid (Aβ) neurotoxicity in Alzheimer's disease (AD). However, the lack of standardized protocols for assessing Aβ toxicity-including differentiation strategies for SH-SY5Y cells-limits the comparability of results across studies. To address these issues, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate how methodological factors influence Aβ-induced toxicity in SH-SY5Y cells. We included 359 eligible studies encompassing 1192 MTT-based comparisons of cell viability between Aβ-treated and control SH-SY5Y cells. A three-level meta-analysis estimated mean cell viability after Aβ exposure at 63% of control levels (95% CI [61.6; 64.3]), with very high heterogeneity (I<sup>2</sup> = 99.6%). Meta-regression identified significant associations between increased toxicity and higher Aβ concentrations, longer exposure durations, and the use of peptide preparations described as fibrils. Conversely, differentiation protocols, duration, and cell density did not significantly influence toxicity outcomes. Reporting quality was often poor, with frequent omissions regarding cell line origin, authentication, contamination testing, Aβ preparation details, and nature of the experimental unit. Overall, our findings show robust Aβ toxicity in SH-SY5Y cells, primarily driven by dose, exposure time, and Aβ aggregation state, but not cell differentiation status. Our conclusions highlight the critical need for better reporting of Aβ exposure parameters to enhance reproducibility and translational potential in AD research.</p>","PeriodicalId":16527,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Neurochemistry","volume":"170 7","pages":"e70523"},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13398401/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Neurochemistry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jnc.70523","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The SH-SY5Y human neuroblastoma cell line is widely used as an in vitro model of β-amyloid (Aβ) neurotoxicity in Alzheimer's disease (AD). However, the lack of standardized protocols for assessing Aβ toxicity-including differentiation strategies for SH-SY5Y cells-limits the comparability of results across studies. To address these issues, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate how methodological factors influence Aβ-induced toxicity in SH-SY5Y cells. We included 359 eligible studies encompassing 1192 MTT-based comparisons of cell viability between Aβ-treated and control SH-SY5Y cells. A three-level meta-analysis estimated mean cell viability after Aβ exposure at 63% of control levels (95% CI [61.6; 64.3]), with very high heterogeneity (I2 = 99.6%). Meta-regression identified significant associations between increased toxicity and higher Aβ concentrations, longer exposure durations, and the use of peptide preparations described as fibrils. Conversely, differentiation protocols, duration, and cell density did not significantly influence toxicity outcomes. Reporting quality was often poor, with frequent omissions regarding cell line origin, authentication, contamination testing, Aβ preparation details, and nature of the experimental unit. Overall, our findings show robust Aβ toxicity in SH-SY5Y cells, primarily driven by dose, exposure time, and Aβ aggregation state, but not cell differentiation status. Our conclusions highlight the critical need for better reporting of Aβ exposure parameters to enhance reproducibility and translational potential in AD research.

SH-SY5Y神经母细胞瘤细胞系作为β-淀粉样蛋白神经毒性模型的局限性和优势:来自系统回顾和荟萃分析的经验教训
SH-SY5Y人神经母细胞瘤细胞系被广泛用作阿尔茨海默病(AD) β-淀粉样蛋白(Aβ)神经毒性的体外模型。然而,缺乏评估Aβ毒性的标准化方案-包括SH-SY5Y细胞的分化策略-限制了研究结果的可比性。为了解决这些问题,我们进行了系统回顾和荟萃分析,以评估方法学因素如何影响a β诱导的SH-SY5Y细胞毒性。我们纳入了359项符合条件的研究,其中包括1192项基于mtt的a β处理和对照SH-SY5Y细胞存活率比较。三水平荟萃分析估计Aβ暴露后的平均细胞活力为对照水平的63% (95% CI[61.6; 64.3]),异质性非常高(I2 = 99.6%)。meta回归发现毒性增加与较高的Aβ浓度、较长的暴露时间和使用被称为原纤维的肽制剂之间存在显著关联。相反,分化方案、持续时间和细胞密度对毒性结果没有显著影响。报告质量通常较差,经常遗漏细胞系来源、认证、污染测试、Aβ制备细节和实验单位的性质。总的来说,我们的研究结果表明,SH-SY5Y细胞中存在强大的Aβ毒性,主要由剂量、暴露时间和Aβ聚集状态驱动,而不是细胞分化状态。我们的结论强调了更好地报道Aβ暴露参数以提高阿尔茨海默病研究的可重复性和转化潜力的迫切需要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Neurochemistry
Journal of Neurochemistry 医学-神经科学
CiteScore
9.30
自引率
2.10%
发文量
181
审稿时长
2.2 months
期刊介绍: Journal of Neurochemistry focuses on molecular, cellular and biochemical aspects of the nervous system, the pathogenesis of neurological disorders and the development of disease specific biomarkers. It is devoted to the prompt publication of original findings of the highest scientific priority and value that provide novel mechanistic insights, represent a clear advance over previous studies and have the potential to generate exciting future research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书