Oncology drug development in the UK: analysis of the past 25 years and focus on the 2026 reboot of the clinical trial regulatory framework

IF 7.8 1区 医学 Q1 ONCOLOGY
Paulina Czajka-Francuz, Chris Twelves, James Spicer, Archana Munje, Laura Vidal, Ruth Plummer, Dinesh Mistry, Maksym Novikov, Jim Bush, Gopalakrishnan Srinivasan, Soma Das, Sharan Sandhu, Vikram Bohra, Chinmayee Joshi, Ken Morrison, Suvarna Chavan, Fiona Thistlethwaite, Andrew Walding, Glen Clack, Michael George, Debashis Sarker, Raghib Ali, Sarah P. Blagden, Thomas R. Jeffry Evans, Kamal S. Saini
{"title":"Oncology drug development in the UK: analysis of the past 25 years and focus on the 2026 reboot of the clinical trial regulatory framework","authors":"Paulina Czajka-Francuz, Chris Twelves, James Spicer, Archana Munje, Laura Vidal, Ruth Plummer, Dinesh Mistry, Maksym Novikov, Jim Bush, Gopalakrishnan Srinivasan, Soma Das, Sharan Sandhu, Vikram Bohra, Chinmayee Joshi, Ken Morrison, Suvarna Chavan, Fiona Thistlethwaite, Andrew Walding, Glen Clack, Michael George, Debashis Sarker, Raghib Ali, Sarah P. Blagden, Thomas R. Jeffry Evans, Kamal S. Saini","doi":"10.1038/s41416-026-03543-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The aim of the article was to analyse the trends in oncology interventional clinical trials in the United Kingdom (UK) from 2000 to 2025, compare with major global regions, and to assess the potential impact of the New UK Clinical Trials Regulation (UK CTR) 2026 regulatory reform on the future competitiveness. Retrospective observational analysis of interventional oncology trials registered on ClinicalTrials.gov with comparison across the UK, European Union (EU; comprising 27 member states), the United States, and the Republic of China (China). Number of trials, phase distribution, funding source, and population-adjusted trial density across three time intervals (2000–2015, 2016–2020, 2021–2025). The UK experienced growth in oncology trials until 2017, followed by declines associated with Brexit and the COVID-19 pandemic, and partial recovery thereafter. While the EU and USA maintained high absolute trial numbers, both showed declining population-adjusted research intensity over time. China demonstrated the fastest growth, with substantial increases in early phase trials and trial density. Despite recent challenges, the UK retains strong infrastructure and expertise in oncology research; the 2026 regulatory reform may support the future attractiveness of the UK, particularly for early phase trials, although increasing global competition remains a significant issue.","PeriodicalId":9243,"journal":{"name":"British Journal of Cancer","volume":"135 8","pages":"1286-1297"},"PeriodicalIF":7.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.nature.comhttps://www.nature.com/articles/s41416-026-03543-6.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British Journal of Cancer","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.nature.com/articles/s41416-026-03543-6","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The aim of the article was to analyse the trends in oncology interventional clinical trials in the United Kingdom (UK) from 2000 to 2025, compare with major global regions, and to assess the potential impact of the New UK Clinical Trials Regulation (UK CTR) 2026 regulatory reform on the future competitiveness. Retrospective observational analysis of interventional oncology trials registered on ClinicalTrials.gov with comparison across the UK, European Union (EU; comprising 27 member states), the United States, and the Republic of China (China). Number of trials, phase distribution, funding source, and population-adjusted trial density across three time intervals (2000–2015, 2016–2020, 2021–2025). The UK experienced growth in oncology trials until 2017, followed by declines associated with Brexit and the COVID-19 pandemic, and partial recovery thereafter. While the EU and USA maintained high absolute trial numbers, both showed declining population-adjusted research intensity over time. China demonstrated the fastest growth, with substantial increases in early phase trials and trial density. Despite recent challenges, the UK retains strong infrastructure and expertise in oncology research; the 2026 regulatory reform may support the future attractiveness of the UK, particularly for early phase trials, although increasing global competition remains a significant issue.
英国肿瘤药物开发:分析过去25年,重点关注2026年重启临床试验监管框架。
目的:本文的目的是分析2000年至2025年英国(UK)肿瘤介入临床试验的趋势,与全球主要地区进行比较,并评估新英国临床试验法规(UK CTR) 2026监管改革对未来竞争力的潜在影响。设计:回顾性观察分析在ClinicalTrials.gov上注册的介入肿瘤学试验,并比较英国、欧盟(EU,包括27个成员国)、美国和中华民国(中国)。主要结局指标:三个时间间隔(2000-2015年、2016-2020年、2021-2025年)的试验数量、阶段分布、资金来源和人口调整试验密度。结果:在2017年之前,英国的肿瘤试验数量一直在增长,随后因英国脱欧和COVID-19大流行而下降,此后部分复苏。虽然欧盟和美国保持了较高的绝对试验数量,但随着时间的推移,这两个国家的人口调整研究强度都在下降。中国增长最快,前期试验和试验密度大幅增加。结论:尽管最近面临挑战,英国在肿瘤研究方面保留了强大的基础设施和专业知识;2026年的监管改革可能会支持英国未来的吸引力,特别是在早期试验阶段,尽管日益激烈的全球竞争仍然是一个重大问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
British Journal of Cancer
British Journal of Cancer 医学-肿瘤学
CiteScore
15.10
自引率
1.10%
发文量
383
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: The British Journal of Cancer is one of the most-cited general cancer journals, publishing significant advances in translational and clinical cancer research.It also publishes high-quality reviews and thought-provoking comment on all aspects of cancer prevention,diagnosis and treatment.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书