Association between the timing of prehospital epinephrine administration and patient outcomes after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest in Korea: a nationwide observational study.
Seung Hyo Lee, Won Pyo Hong, Jeong Ho Park, Minjung Kim, Young Su Kim
{"title":"Association between the timing of prehospital epinephrine administration and patient outcomes after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest in Korea: a nationwide observational study.","authors":"Seung Hyo Lee, Won Pyo Hong, Jeong Ho Park, Minjung Kim, Young Su Kim","doi":"10.1136/emermed-2025-215848","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The optimal timing of epinephrine during out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) remains uncertain, particularly for neurological recovery. We examined the association between time-to-epinephrine and clinical outcomes in adult OHCA in Korea.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a nationwide retrospective cohort of emergency medical service (EMS)-treated, non-traumatic adult OHCA (2019-2021). Patients were classified as early (≤20 min) or delayed (>20 min) based on arrest-to-first epinephrine. The primary outcome was favourable neurological status at discharge (Cerebral Performance Category (CPC) 1-2); secondary outcomes were return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) and survival to discharge. We applied 1:1 propensity-score matching and multivariable logistic regression, including continuous (per 1-minute and 5-minute delays) and 5-minute bin analyses of time-to-epinephrine, with effect modification assessed by initial rhythm.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 10 726 patients, 3589 (33.5%) received epinephrine within 20 min. In the matched cohort (n = 5,734), delayed administration was associated with lower survival (4.46% vs 7.74%; aOR 0.56, 95% CI 0.44-0.71) and lower likelihood of favourable neurological outcome (2.13% vs 3.77%; aOR 0.56, 95% CI 0.40-0.79), compared with early administration. In continuous models, each 1-minute delay was associated with lower odds of good CPC (aOR 0.964, 95% CI 0.942 to 0.987); a 5-minute delay corresponded to aOR 0.833 (95% CI 0.741 to 0.937) and bin-wise estimates showed a marked drop beyond 30 min (aOR 0.048, 95% CI 0.006 to 0.393).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Early epinephrine administration within 20 min of cardiac arrest onset was associated with higher rates of ROSC, survival to discharge and favourable neurological recovery in this EMS setting. These findings support the importance of timely advanced life support delivery, including early epinephrine, although cautious interpretation is warranted.</p>","PeriodicalId":11532,"journal":{"name":"Emergency Medicine Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Emergency Medicine Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/emermed-2025-215848","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective: The optimal timing of epinephrine during out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) remains uncertain, particularly for neurological recovery. We examined the association between time-to-epinephrine and clinical outcomes in adult OHCA in Korea.
Methods: We conducted a nationwide retrospective cohort of emergency medical service (EMS)-treated, non-traumatic adult OHCA (2019-2021). Patients were classified as early (≤20 min) or delayed (>20 min) based on arrest-to-first epinephrine. The primary outcome was favourable neurological status at discharge (Cerebral Performance Category (CPC) 1-2); secondary outcomes were return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) and survival to discharge. We applied 1:1 propensity-score matching and multivariable logistic regression, including continuous (per 1-minute and 5-minute delays) and 5-minute bin analyses of time-to-epinephrine, with effect modification assessed by initial rhythm.
Results: Among 10 726 patients, 3589 (33.5%) received epinephrine within 20 min. In the matched cohort (n = 5,734), delayed administration was associated with lower survival (4.46% vs 7.74%; aOR 0.56, 95% CI 0.44-0.71) and lower likelihood of favourable neurological outcome (2.13% vs 3.77%; aOR 0.56, 95% CI 0.40-0.79), compared with early administration. In continuous models, each 1-minute delay was associated with lower odds of good CPC (aOR 0.964, 95% CI 0.942 to 0.987); a 5-minute delay corresponded to aOR 0.833 (95% CI 0.741 to 0.937) and bin-wise estimates showed a marked drop beyond 30 min (aOR 0.048, 95% CI 0.006 to 0.393).
Conclusion: Early epinephrine administration within 20 min of cardiac arrest onset was associated with higher rates of ROSC, survival to discharge and favourable neurological recovery in this EMS setting. These findings support the importance of timely advanced life support delivery, including early epinephrine, although cautious interpretation is warranted.
目的:院外心脏骤停(OHCA)期间肾上腺素的最佳时机仍然不确定,特别是对于神经系统恢复。我们研究了韩国成人OHCA患者产生肾上腺素的时间与临床结果之间的关系。方法:我们在全国范围内对急诊医疗服务(EMS)治疗的非创伤性成人OHCA进行了回顾性队列研究(2019-2021)。根据心跳骤停至首次肾上腺素水平将患者分为早期(≤20分钟)或延迟(>20分钟)。主要结局是出院时良好的神经系统状态(脑功能分类(CPC) 1-2);次要终点为自然循环恢复(ROSC)和存活至出院。我们采用1:1倾向评分匹配和多变量逻辑回归,包括连续(每1分钟和每5分钟延迟)和5分钟bin时间对肾上腺素的影响进行分析,并通过初始节奏评估效果的改变。结果:10726例患者中,3589例(33.5%)在20分钟内接受肾上腺素治疗。在匹配的队列中(n = 5,734),与早期给药相比,延迟给药与较低的生存率(4.46% vs 7.74%; aOR 0.56, 95% CI 0.44-0.71)和较低的神经系统预后可能性(2.13% vs 3.77%; aOR 0.56, 95% CI 0.40-0.79)相关。在连续模型中,每延迟1分钟,CPC良好的几率就会降低(aOR 0.964, 95% CI 0.942 ~ 0.987);延迟5分钟对应的aOR为0.833 (95% CI 0.741至0.937),双向估计显示超过30分钟后显著下降(aOR 0.048, 95% CI 0.006至0.393)。结论:在心脏骤停发作后20分钟内早期给药肾上腺素与较高的ROSC率、出院存活率和良好的神经系统恢复有关。这些发现支持及时晚期生命支持的重要性,包括早期肾上腺素,尽管谨慎的解释是必要的。
期刊介绍:
The Emergency Medicine Journal is a leading international journal reporting developments and advances in emergency medicine and acute care. It has relevance to all specialties involved in the management of emergencies in the hospital and prehospital environment. Each issue contains editorials, reviews, original research, evidence based reviews, letters and more.