Association between the timing of prehospital epinephrine administration and patient outcomes after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest in Korea: a nationwide observational study.

IF 2.8 3区 医学 Q1 EMERGENCY MEDICINE
Seung Hyo Lee, Won Pyo Hong, Jeong Ho Park, Minjung Kim, Young Su Kim
{"title":"Association between the timing of prehospital epinephrine administration and patient outcomes after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest in Korea: a nationwide observational study.","authors":"Seung Hyo Lee, Won Pyo Hong, Jeong Ho Park, Minjung Kim, Young Su Kim","doi":"10.1136/emermed-2025-215848","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The optimal timing of epinephrine during out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) remains uncertain, particularly for neurological recovery. We examined the association between time-to-epinephrine and clinical outcomes in adult OHCA in Korea.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a nationwide retrospective cohort of emergency medical service (EMS)-treated, non-traumatic adult OHCA (2019-2021). Patients were classified as early (≤20 min) or delayed (>20 min) based on arrest-to-first epinephrine. The primary outcome was favourable neurological status at discharge (Cerebral Performance Category (CPC) 1-2); secondary outcomes were return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) and survival to discharge. We applied 1:1 propensity-score matching and multivariable logistic regression, including continuous (per 1-minute and 5-minute delays) and 5-minute bin analyses of time-to-epinephrine, with effect modification assessed by initial rhythm.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 10 726 patients, 3589 (33.5%) received epinephrine within 20 min. In the matched cohort (n = 5,734), delayed administration was associated with lower survival (4.46% vs 7.74%; aOR 0.56, 95% CI 0.44-0.71) and lower likelihood of favourable neurological outcome (2.13% vs 3.77%; aOR 0.56, 95% CI 0.40-0.79), compared with early administration. In continuous models, each 1-minute delay was associated with lower odds of good CPC (aOR 0.964, 95% CI 0.942 to 0.987); a 5-minute delay corresponded to aOR 0.833 (95% CI 0.741 to 0.937) and bin-wise estimates showed a marked drop beyond 30 min (aOR 0.048, 95% CI 0.006 to 0.393).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Early epinephrine administration within 20 min of cardiac arrest onset was associated with higher rates of ROSC, survival to discharge and favourable neurological recovery in this EMS setting. These findings support the importance of timely advanced life support delivery, including early epinephrine, although cautious interpretation is warranted.</p>","PeriodicalId":11532,"journal":{"name":"Emergency Medicine Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Emergency Medicine Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/emermed-2025-215848","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: The optimal timing of epinephrine during out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) remains uncertain, particularly for neurological recovery. We examined the association between time-to-epinephrine and clinical outcomes in adult OHCA in Korea.

Methods: We conducted a nationwide retrospective cohort of emergency medical service (EMS)-treated, non-traumatic adult OHCA (2019-2021). Patients were classified as early (≤20 min) or delayed (>20 min) based on arrest-to-first epinephrine. The primary outcome was favourable neurological status at discharge (Cerebral Performance Category (CPC) 1-2); secondary outcomes were return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) and survival to discharge. We applied 1:1 propensity-score matching and multivariable logistic regression, including continuous (per 1-minute and 5-minute delays) and 5-minute bin analyses of time-to-epinephrine, with effect modification assessed by initial rhythm.

Results: Among 10 726 patients, 3589 (33.5%) received epinephrine within 20 min. In the matched cohort (n = 5,734), delayed administration was associated with lower survival (4.46% vs 7.74%; aOR 0.56, 95% CI 0.44-0.71) and lower likelihood of favourable neurological outcome (2.13% vs 3.77%; aOR 0.56, 95% CI 0.40-0.79), compared with early administration. In continuous models, each 1-minute delay was associated with lower odds of good CPC (aOR 0.964, 95% CI 0.942 to 0.987); a 5-minute delay corresponded to aOR 0.833 (95% CI 0.741 to 0.937) and bin-wise estimates showed a marked drop beyond 30 min (aOR 0.048, 95% CI 0.006 to 0.393).

Conclusion: Early epinephrine administration within 20 min of cardiac arrest onset was associated with higher rates of ROSC, survival to discharge and favourable neurological recovery in this EMS setting. These findings support the importance of timely advanced life support delivery, including early epinephrine, although cautious interpretation is warranted.

院前肾上腺素给药时间与韩国院外心脏骤停后患者预后之间的关系:一项全国性的观察性研究
目的:院外心脏骤停(OHCA)期间肾上腺素的最佳时机仍然不确定,特别是对于神经系统恢复。我们研究了韩国成人OHCA患者产生肾上腺素的时间与临床结果之间的关系。方法:我们在全国范围内对急诊医疗服务(EMS)治疗的非创伤性成人OHCA进行了回顾性队列研究(2019-2021)。根据心跳骤停至首次肾上腺素水平将患者分为早期(≤20分钟)或延迟(>20分钟)。主要结局是出院时良好的神经系统状态(脑功能分类(CPC) 1-2);次要终点为自然循环恢复(ROSC)和存活至出院。我们采用1:1倾向评分匹配和多变量逻辑回归,包括连续(每1分钟和每5分钟延迟)和5分钟bin时间对肾上腺素的影响进行分析,并通过初始节奏评估效果的改变。结果:10726例患者中,3589例(33.5%)在20分钟内接受肾上腺素治疗。在匹配的队列中(n = 5,734),与早期给药相比,延迟给药与较低的生存率(4.46% vs 7.74%; aOR 0.56, 95% CI 0.44-0.71)和较低的神经系统预后可能性(2.13% vs 3.77%; aOR 0.56, 95% CI 0.40-0.79)相关。在连续模型中,每延迟1分钟,CPC良好的几率就会降低(aOR 0.964, 95% CI 0.942 ~ 0.987);延迟5分钟对应的aOR为0.833 (95% CI 0.741至0.937),双向估计显示超过30分钟后显著下降(aOR 0.048, 95% CI 0.006至0.393)。结论:在心脏骤停发作后20分钟内早期给药肾上腺素与较高的ROSC率、出院存活率和良好的神经系统恢复有关。这些发现支持及时晚期生命支持的重要性,包括早期肾上腺素,尽管谨慎的解释是必要的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Emergency Medicine Journal
Emergency Medicine Journal 医学-急救医学
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
6.50%
发文量
262
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Emergency Medicine Journal is a leading international journal reporting developments and advances in emergency medicine and acute care. It has relevance to all specialties involved in the management of emergencies in the hospital and prehospital environment. Each issue contains editorials, reviews, original research, evidence based reviews, letters and more.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书