Dose calculation errors for volumetric modulated arc therapy plans of various complexity.

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q3 ONCOLOGY
Emmanouil Terzidis, Fredrik Nordström, Magnus Gustafsson, Anna Karlsson, Julia Götstedt, Anna Bäck
{"title":"Dose calculation errors for volumetric modulated arc therapy plans of various complexity.","authors":"Emmanouil Terzidis, Fredrik Nordström, Magnus Gustafsson, Anna Karlsson, Julia Götstedt, Anna Bäck","doi":"10.2340/1651-226X.2026.45698","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and purpose: </strong>Volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) plans often involve small and irregular beam apertures (i.e. high complexity), which can pose challenges for accurate dose calculations. The aim of this study was to investigate plausible dose calculation errors for VMAT plans of various complexity. Patient/material and methods: Twenty patient cases, each with three VMAT plans of different complexities (i.e. 60 plans in total), were included. All plans were calculated using six different dose calculation methods. It was assumed that greater differences between calculations reflect increased difficulty in accurately estimating dose. Basic performances of the six calculation methods were evaluated based on static fields. Three-dimensional distributions of voxel-wise two standard deviations (2SDs) in percent of local voxel dose were visually evaluated. 2SD volume histograms were analyzed as well as the mean (2SDMean) and maximum 2SD within 2 cm3 (2SD2cc) for different regions of interest.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Higher 2SD values were generally found outside the planning target volume (PTV) compared to inside, particularly in low dose and buildup regions. Average (per treatment site) 2SDMean/2SD2cc values were 0.9-1.2%/1.8-5.1% in the PTV and 1.8-3.1/8.4-18.7% for the region 1 cm outside the PTV. For organs of interest, 2SDMean/2SD2cc values were larger than the equivalent values in the PTV, with highest values up to 5/15% observed for the prostate cases.</p><p><strong>Interpretation: </strong>Variations between dose calculation methods were larger in organs of interest than in the PTVs. Differences in 2SD distributions between the patient cases were generally larger than differences between the complexity levels.</p>","PeriodicalId":7110,"journal":{"name":"Acta Oncologica","volume":"65 ","pages":"614-623"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13410304/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Oncologica","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2340/1651-226X.2026.45698","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and purpose: Volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) plans often involve small and irregular beam apertures (i.e. high complexity), which can pose challenges for accurate dose calculations. The aim of this study was to investigate plausible dose calculation errors for VMAT plans of various complexity. Patient/material and methods: Twenty patient cases, each with three VMAT plans of different complexities (i.e. 60 plans in total), were included. All plans were calculated using six different dose calculation methods. It was assumed that greater differences between calculations reflect increased difficulty in accurately estimating dose. Basic performances of the six calculation methods were evaluated based on static fields. Three-dimensional distributions of voxel-wise two standard deviations (2SDs) in percent of local voxel dose were visually evaluated. 2SD volume histograms were analyzed as well as the mean (2SDMean) and maximum 2SD within 2 cm3 (2SD2cc) for different regions of interest.

Results: Higher 2SD values were generally found outside the planning target volume (PTV) compared to inside, particularly in low dose and buildup regions. Average (per treatment site) 2SDMean/2SD2cc values were 0.9-1.2%/1.8-5.1% in the PTV and 1.8-3.1/8.4-18.7% for the region 1 cm outside the PTV. For organs of interest, 2SDMean/2SD2cc values were larger than the equivalent values in the PTV, with highest values up to 5/15% observed for the prostate cases.

Interpretation: Variations between dose calculation methods were larger in organs of interest than in the PTVs. Differences in 2SD distributions between the patient cases were generally larger than differences between the complexity levels.

各种复杂的体积调制电弧治疗方案的剂量计算误差。
背景和目的:体积调制电弧治疗(VMAT)计划通常涉及小而不规则的光束孔径(即高复杂性),这可能对准确的剂量计算构成挑战。本研究的目的是探讨不同复杂性的VMAT计划的合理剂量计算误差。患者/材料和方法:包括20例患者,每个患者有三个不同复杂性的VMAT计划(即总共60个计划)。所有计划采用六种不同的剂量计算方法进行计算。假定计算之间的较大差异反映出准确估计剂量的难度增加。基于静场对六种计算方法的基本性能进行了评价。视觉评价局部体素剂量百分比的体素双标准差(2sd)的三维分布。分析不同感兴趣区域的2SD体积直方图以及2 cm3内的平均值(2SDMean)和最大2SD值(2SD2cc)。结果:规划靶体积(PTV)外的2SD值普遍高于PTV内,特别是在低剂量和堆积区。PTV的平均值/2SD2cc为0.9-1.2%/1.8-5.1%,PTV外1cm区域为1.8-3.1/8.4-18.7%。对于感兴趣的器官,2SDMean/2SD2cc值大于PTV的等效值,在前列腺病例中观察到的最高值高达5/15%。解释:不同剂量计算方法之间的差异在目标器官中比在PTVs中更大。病例间2SD分布的差异一般大于复杂程度间的差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Acta Oncologica
Acta Oncologica 医学-肿瘤学
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
3.20%
发文量
301
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Acta Oncologica is a journal for the clinical oncologist and accepts articles within all fields of clinical cancer research. Articles on tumour pathology, experimental oncology, radiobiology, cancer epidemiology and medical radio physics are also welcome, especially if they have a clinical aim or interest. Scientific articles on cancer nursing and psychological or social aspects of cancer are also welcomed. Extensive material may be published as Supplements, for which special conditions apply.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书