Efficacy and safety of sugammadex for reversal of neuromuscular blockade in pediatric patients: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials with trial sequential analysis.

IF 3.6
Hyosung Kim, Byung Gun Lim, Young Sung Kim, Seok Woo Jeong, Jisung Bae
{"title":"Efficacy and safety of sugammadex for reversal of neuromuscular blockade in pediatric patients: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials with trial sequential analysis.","authors":"Hyosung Kim, Byung Gun Lim, Young Sung Kim, Seok Woo Jeong, Jisung Bae","doi":"10.17085/apm.25488","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Sugammadex has recently been approved globally for use in pediatric patients aged ≥ 2 years. This meta-analysis with trial sequential analysis (TSA) evaluated the efficacy and safety of sugammadex for reversal of neuromuscular blockade (NMB) in pediatric patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>PubMed, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library, Web of Science, Scopus, KoreaMed, and ClinicalTrials.gov were searched from inception to December 31, 2023. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating sugammadex in pediatric patients were included. Efficacy outcomes were time to recovery to a train-of-four (TOF) ratio ≥ 0.9 and extubation time. Safety outcomes included overall post-anesthetic adverse events, bradycardia, tachycardia, postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV), recurarization, and desaturation. Data were analyzed using RevMan, and TSA was performed using Copenhagen Trial Unit software.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 21 RCTs (n=1,394 pediatric patients) were included in the study. Time to TOF ratio ≥ 0.9 was significantly shorter with sugammadex than with control (neostigmine or placebo) for both 2 mg/kg (mean difference [95% confidence interval], -6.03 [-7.85 to -4.21] min) and 4 mg/kg (-30.06 [-37.58 to -22.55] min). The extubation time was shorter with sugammadex (-14.26 [-17.22 to -11.30] min). The TSA for both efficacy outcomes indicated that the required information size had been reached, suggesting that additional trials are unlikely to change the efficacy conclusions. PONV, tachycardia, and desaturation occurred less frequently with sugammadex, whereas the overall post-anesthetic adverse events, recurarization, and bradycardia were comparable.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Sugammadex was associated with faster and more effective reversal of rocuronium-induced NMB in pediatric patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":101360,"journal":{"name":"Anesthesia and pain medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13444192/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anesthesia and pain medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17085/apm.25488","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Sugammadex has recently been approved globally for use in pediatric patients aged ≥ 2 years. This meta-analysis with trial sequential analysis (TSA) evaluated the efficacy and safety of sugammadex for reversal of neuromuscular blockade (NMB) in pediatric patients.

Methods: PubMed, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library, Web of Science, Scopus, KoreaMed, and ClinicalTrials.gov were searched from inception to December 31, 2023. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating sugammadex in pediatric patients were included. Efficacy outcomes were time to recovery to a train-of-four (TOF) ratio ≥ 0.9 and extubation time. Safety outcomes included overall post-anesthetic adverse events, bradycardia, tachycardia, postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV), recurarization, and desaturation. Data were analyzed using RevMan, and TSA was performed using Copenhagen Trial Unit software.

Results: A total of 21 RCTs (n=1,394 pediatric patients) were included in the study. Time to TOF ratio ≥ 0.9 was significantly shorter with sugammadex than with control (neostigmine or placebo) for both 2 mg/kg (mean difference [95% confidence interval], -6.03 [-7.85 to -4.21] min) and 4 mg/kg (-30.06 [-37.58 to -22.55] min). The extubation time was shorter with sugammadex (-14.26 [-17.22 to -11.30] min). The TSA for both efficacy outcomes indicated that the required information size had been reached, suggesting that additional trials are unlikely to change the efficacy conclusions. PONV, tachycardia, and desaturation occurred less frequently with sugammadex, whereas the overall post-anesthetic adverse events, recurarization, and bradycardia were comparable.

Conclusions: Sugammadex was associated with faster and more effective reversal of rocuronium-induced NMB in pediatric patients.

sugammadex逆转小儿神经肌肉阻断的疗效和安全性:一项最新的随机对照试验系统评价和荟萃分析。
背景:Sugammadex最近在全球范围内被批准用于2岁以上的儿科患者。本荟萃分析采用试验序贯分析(TSA)评估了sugammadex逆转小儿患者神经肌肉阻断(NMB)的有效性和安全性。方法:检索PubMed、EMBASE、Cochrane Library、Web of Science、Scopus、KoreaMed和ClinicalTrials.gov从成立到2023年12月31日。随机对照试验(RCTs)评估糖玛德在儿科患者中的应用。疗效指标为恢复至四组(TOF)比率≥0.9的时间和拔管时间。安全性指标包括总体麻醉后不良事件、心动过缓、心动过速、术后恶心和呕吐(PONV)、复发和去饱和。数据分析采用RevMan软件,TSA采用Copenhagen Trial Unit软件。结果:共纳入21项随机对照试验(n=1,394例儿科患者)。2 mg/kg组(平均差值[95%可信区间],-6.03[-7.85至-4.21]min)和4 mg/kg组(-30.06[-37.58至-22.55]min), sugammadex组的TOF比≥0.9显著短于对照组(新斯的明或安慰剂组)。拔管时间较短(-14.26 [-17.22 ~ -11.30]min)。两种疗效结果的TSA表明已达到所需的信息量,这表明额外的试验不太可能改变疗效结论。糖madex组PONV、心动过速和去饱和发生率较低,而总体麻醉后不良事件、复发和心动过缓是相似的。结论:Sugammadex与儿科患者更快、更有效地逆转罗库溴铵诱导的NMB相关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书